| |||||||||||||
The environment fostered frequent encounters of staff in hallways, resource centers such as libraries, and especially in the lunchroom. When you talk to a former Bell Labs employee or read last year’s superb Bell Labs history book authored by Jon Gertner aptly called The Idea Factory, management considered real estate to be a major part of the grand design in creating a culture for personal interaction. Bell Labs’ unmatched creativity also stemmed from the hiring of a broad array of scientists, engineers, and technicians that spanned the whole range of skills needed to develop communication technologies—a practice that became a tradition for most of the 20th century. Moreover, the AT&T-managed monopoly with the US government allowed for stable, long-term funding of Bell Labs until the court-ordered breakup of the Bell system in 1984. The Bell Labs real estate was designed to encourage and enable the interdisciplinary staff to mix both formally for the task at hand, and informally, to take advantage of a serendipitous meeting of the minds. I have had the pleasure of knowing and working with many Bell Labs colleagues over my 40-year career, and have come to admire and envy what they experienced. I have also seen where similar cross connections of creative people have encouraged innovative behavior. I worked for two modest-sized DOE national labs and each required a highly interdisciplinary staff. The communal lunchrooms at these two labs gave birth to more good ideas than the sum total of motivational courses to which we subjected our staffs. I had the pleasure of working for the founding director of Jefferson Lab, Hermann Grunder, who stacked every lunch table with a pencil and notepad to make sure a good thought didn’t lose its fidelity on a napkin. One of my jobs at Jefferson Lab was fostering collaborations between the laboratory and neighboring research universities. I quickly became aware of the geographical disadvantages of modern universities, where academic departments are often enshrined in separate buildings. As I made my campus visits, I encountered two independent groups at one university doing laser-induced chemistry studies; they were separated by a street and two departmental bureaucracies. Had they talked to each other, both groups could have strengthened their efforts. They could have boosted their power collectively—but didn’t. At a second campus, I found a trio of scientists all working on nanocrystalline diamond—one an experimentalist, one a device builder, and one a modeler—but none of the three had ever talked to each other about collaborating and combining their obvious strengths. My personal experience in the sciences and engineering compels a strong bias for staff co-location—not only for the obvious tasks of designing, building, and testing machines from small instruments to gargantuan particle accelerators, but also for the day-to-day chance collaboration that creates a serendipitous solution to a shared problem. I don’t see this being replaced by a virtual presence on a handheld device or laptop screen. Now, I might change my mind when my laser buddies usher in a full 3D holographic presence—but how will we share the same cup of caffeinated conversation starter?
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
AIP Publishing’s China office recently gave the Journal of Mathematical Physics (JMP) a strong presence at the 16th Workshop on Quantum Information Processing, hosted at Tsinghua University, China, from January 21–25. JMP was represented by Xingtao Ai, AIP Publishing’s China office manager, who was able to talk with leaders in the field as well as several JMP Editorial Advisory Board members. USB drives containing a JMP special issue on quantum information were distributed to attendees. |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
SPS: a gateway to Member Societies One of the main objectives of the Society of Physics Students’ is to be the student “gateway” to the AIP Member Societies and other professional organizations. This is facilitated in many ways. For example, students receive a free membership in one of the Member Societies when they join SPS. Additionally, SPS partners with many of these societies to hold research sessions, receptions, and career panels at their annual meetings.
SPS broadens student participation at these meetings through the SPS Reporter Awards, which offer travel support for SPS chapters or individual students reporting on a national scientific society meeting for SPS. The resulting articles often appear as feature articles on the SPS website and in SPS publications. Member Societies are notified when reports go online or are featured in SPS publications, and the articles may also be used in the host societies’ publications. The program provides unique opportunities for students to interact with prominent scientists. For example, SPS reporters at APS, AAS, and some other meetings receive full access to the pressroom and press conferences. Students are given the authority to interview scientists whom they might not have otherwise approached. SPS reporter Lois Smith of the University of Colorado at Boulder commented on her experience at the “Women in Science” mixer at the AGU Fall 2012 Meeting in San Francisco, CA: “My experiences at this event—and the rest of the conference—affirmed my belief I can do anything, regardless of my gender, and reminded me that there’s an international support network of female scientists out there.” Her full article, “Wow, What a Week!” is available on the SPS website. Web visitors will also find many recent reports, including those covering meetings of AAPT and AAS, as well as the Conferences for Undergraduate Women in Physics. |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
March 18–22
*All AIP Events listed below are in College Park, MD Saturday, March 23
Wednesday, April 3
Thursday, April 4
Friday, April 5
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
+