The new magnesium
superconductors were the subject of a mammoth session at the APS meeting.
Even bigger (in terms of papers delivered---79 altogether) than the1987
"Woodstock of Physics" meeting where ceramic superconductors
came to prominence, this "Woodstock West" session showcased
results from a dozen countries performed within weeks or days of the
January announcement of superconductivity in MgB2.
The heart of superconductivity
is the formation and flow of pairs of charges, and each time a new material
is found to sustain resistanceless currents the nature of the pairing
has to be explored all over again. Typical diagnostic tests include
(1) measuring the energy (the "energy gap") that holds electron
pairs together in the superconducting state; (2) measuring the density
of phonon states in the material (phonons are the particle equivalent
of the subtle lattice vibrations that, according to the BCS theory,
hold the electron pairs together; in these tests a beam of neutrons
are sent into the sample, where they excite vibrations equivalent to
striking a bell and listening for the characteristic tones; and (3)
seeing what happens when atoms in the material are replaced by different
isotopes (boron and magnesium in this case) or even atoms of different
elements.
Besides these plentiful
yeoman measurements, what discoveries came to light at the Seattle session?
Robert Cava of Princeton announced superconductivity in a MgCNi3
sample at a temperature of 8 K. Cava claimed that this represents the
first metallic perovskite superconductor. Jun Akimitsu of Aoyama Gakuin
University in Tokyo, whose discovery set off the MgB research frenzy
in the first place, reported superconductivity at 35 K in a Mg-B-Be
compound. Beryllium, unfortunately, is a toxic material, and increasing
the Be fraction in the recipe actually depressed the superconductivity
transition temperature.
APS
site on the Seattle MgB2 session