Caution: slippage might occur in tightly confined fluids. Fluid mechanics
is one of the most mature and successful branches of physics---a study
vital for understanding phenomena ranging from ocean currents to the
lift generated by butterfly wings. It would likely startle many physicists
to learn that one of the venerated discipline's fundamental assumptions
is sometimes wrong.
But that's exactly what a group of researchers from the Australian
National University found in an experimental test of fluid behavior
in small spaces. It has long been thought that the fluid molecules adjacent
to a surface are stationary, regardless of the motion of the rest of
the fluid. This no-slip boundary condition, as the assumption is known,
leads to precise and detailed descriptions of nearly all fluid mechanical
systems.
Recently, however, a number of studies have suggested that the assumption
breaks down for flow in confined spaces, such as the insides of capillaries
or the channels of microfluidic chips used in cutting-edge bioanalysis.
The Australian researchers (V. S. J. Craig, vince.craig@anu.edu.au,
61-2-6125-3359) set out to explicitly test the age-old conjecture by
measuring the motion of a ten micron silica sphere as they drove it
through liquid toward a flat wall. Subsequent analysis showed that a
fluid model incorporating boundary slip explained the data better than
the classical no-slip model. No-slip boundaries are still close enough
to the truth in most circumstances.
The new study, however, reveals that descriptions of the blood moving
through our capillaries, lubricants in nanomachines, and flow in other
tiny systems must include boundary slip conditions to achieve precision
at such small scales. (V. S. J. Craig et al., Physical Review Letters,
30 July; text at Physics
News Select).