House and Senate conferees reached agreement on the FY 2002 Labor-HHS-Education
appropriations conference report (H.Rept. 107-342) late on December
18. As recent news reports indicated, the conferees appropriated only
minimal funding - $12.5 million - for the newly-established Math and
Science Partnerships to improve science and math education. These partnerships
replace the Eisenhower Professional Development program as the only
Department of Education program with funding specifically designated
for science and math. Last year, $250 million in Eisenhower funding
was set aside strictly for teacher improvement in science and math,
so targeted federal funding within the Education Department for science
and math has dropped from $250 million to $12.5 million. However, in
their conference report, the conferees encouraged states to continue
making science and math instruction a high priority by also using other
federal funds available for teacher improvement.
Just a few days earlier, on December 13, Congress passed its reauthorization
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), a massive bill
reforming, consolidating, and streamlining many Education Department
programs. As part of this reform, the Eisenhower program was consolidated
with the Class Size Reduction program into a broader program for improving
teacher quality in general. Also in this bill, the Math and Science
Partnerships program was created and authorized at $450 million (see
FYI #146 for
details).
While the ESEA bill - an authorization bill - established the
Partnerships, the Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill does not provide
the full $450 million recommended in ESEA, providing instead only $12.5
million for this program. However, appropriators also provided another
$2.85 billion for the broad Teacher Quality category, and the conference
report language urges states not to neglect this additional source of
funding for bettering science and math education:
"The conferees note that, although this [partnerships
program] is a separate program designed specifically for the development
of high quality math and science professional development opportunities,
in no way do the conferees intend to discourage the Secretary and
States from using other federal funding for math and science instructional
improvement programs. The conferees strongly urge the Secretary and
States to utilize funding provided by the Teacher Quality Grant program,
as well as other programs funded by the federal government, to strengthen
math and science education programs across the Nation."
The conference report states that an estimated $375 million was spent
to improve science and math education last year, and urges the states
and the Secretary of Education to maintain at least comparable funding
in FY 2002:
"The Eisenhower program required that a minimum of
$250,000,000 be dedicated to math and science professional development
activities; however, the conferees understand that as much as $375,000,000
was actually expended on math and science in fiscal year 2001. The
conferees believe that providing high-quality math and science instruction
is of critical importance to our Nation's future competitiveness,
and agree that math and science professional development opportunities
should be expanded. The conferees therefore strongly urge the Secretary
and the States to continue to fund math and science activities within
the Teacher Quality Grant program at a comparable level in fiscal
year 2002."
So, while Department of Education funding specifically designated for
the improvement of science and math education has dropped from $250
million in FY 2001 to $12.5 million in FY 2002, it is apparent that
states last year used more than just $250 million of their federal education
funds on science and math. It can be hoped that the states will utilize
the $2.85 billion in teacher quality money available to them this year
to continue placing a high priority on these areas. In addition, the
partnerships are a new vehicle for focusing on science and math education
reform, with a broad array of allowable activities, and may be treated
more generously in future years. It is also worth recalling that appropriators,
in the FY 2002 VA/HUD appropriations bill, provided another $160 million
for similar partnerships to be awarded by NSF.
The complete Labor-HHS-Education conference report language on the
Math and Science Partnerships will be provided in FYI
#154.
Audrey T. Leath
Media and Government Relations Division
American Institute of Physics
fyi@aip.org
(301) 209-3094