Congress Ready to Draft FY 2003 DOD Authorization
Bills
Next week the House Armed Services Committee is scheduled to mark up
the FY 2003 defense authorization bill. The Senate Armed Service Committee
should complete its work before mid- May. While the process is months
from being completed, the action taken by both committees will help
determine the parameters for defense S&T spending next year.
Three percent of the defense budget for S&T is the level that has
been recommended by several authorities. This figure was put forward
in the Quadrennial Defense Review Report issued last September (see
FYI #130 in
2001) and advocated in an earlier Defense Science Board Task Force report.
In March, Under Secretary of Defense Pete Aldridge testified that five-
year plan projects an increase in the S&T investment "to approach
3% of the total DoD budget."
Defense S&T's visibility is increasing. A hearing by the Senate
Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities earlier this month
examined the contributions of science and technology in combating terrorism
and weapons of mass destruction. Ronald Sega, Director, Defense Research
and Engineering, opened his testimony by saying "Many of the capabilities
and systems that are in the field today are the result of a conscious
decision, years ago, to invest in Science and Technology (S&T) programs.
The future security and safety of our nation depends in part on a strong
research and development foundation." Sega cited the utilization
of Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance technology, developed by the Naval Research
Laboratory, for the detection of bulk explosives. Sega later described
an "investment continuum that spans basic research through advanced
development with close attention to technology transition. We must seek
a balance across this continuum. Basic research lays the foundation
for tomorrow's innovative development."
The latest effort to strengthen defense S&T spending is a letter
that was just sent to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl
Levin (D-MI) and Ranking Minority Member John Warner (R-VA). The letter,
signed by Joseph Lieberman (D- CT), Rick Santorum (R-PA), Susan Collins
(R-ME), Edward Kennedy (D-MA), Wayne Allard (R-CO), Robert Smith (R-NH),
Jean Carnahan (D-MO), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Mark Dayton (D-MN), Pat Roberts
(R-KS), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), Ben Nelson (D-NE),
and James Inhofe (R-OK), highlights the importance of defense S&T,
and then states:
"It is imperative, therefore, that we act to fund S&T
at 3 percent of the total defense budget. Such an action would be
consistent with the recommendations of the Defense Department's 2001
Quadrennial Defense Review, as well as the 1998 Defense Science Board
Task Force. It would also comport with Section 316 of the FY 2003
Senate Budget Resolution, which passed the Budget Committee on March
21, 2002. Section 316 not only affirms the 3 percent funding goal
for defense S&T, it asserts that: '[r]obust investment in science
and technology is integral to full realization of the promise of the
hi-tech Revolution in Military Affairs.' Rather than meeting or building
toward this goal, however, current Pentagon projections indicate that
the S&T budget will decrease to 2.28 percent by 2007. This trend,
if allowed to continue, will substantially undermine our military
and technological capabilities in the long-term."
The Bush Administration requested $9,676 million for defense S&T
for FY 2003, or 2.7% of the total budget. This is a decline of 2.0%
from the current year budget (see FYI
#14).
Last year, the Administration sought a cut of 2.4% from the previous
year in defense S&T in their revised budget request. While authorizers
would also have made cuts, the appropriators later took the S&T
budget in the other direction. The final S&T appropriation was up
11% over the previous year, to a level that was 3.1% of the total defense
bill (see FYI #152
in 2001).
Richard M. Jones
Media and Government Relations Division
American Institute of Physics fyi@aip.org
(301) 209-3095