MAJOR RESEARCH EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION:
The Bush Administration is requesting an increase in the FY 2004 Major
Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) budget of 60.2%,
or $76.1 million, as compared to the FY 2003 request. The $202.3 million
request is 75.4% higher than the account's FY 2002 budget. As previously
explained, the FY 2003 appropriations bill for the National Science
Foundation has not been enacted.
Considerable congressional attention was devoted to this program last
year, and the new authorization law for the foundation set forth a number
of new requirements. The budget request provides detailed information
regarding this account, running 54 pages long. Below are selections
from the budget request document, as well as funding numbers for "first
priority" and "second priority" projects. Please see
http//:www.nsf.gov/bfa/bud/fy2004/toc.htm
for additional information; this section begins on page 359.
The document states:
"The MREFC Account supports the implementation of major
research facilities and equipment that provide unique capabilities
at the frontiers of science and engineering. Implementation projects
supported by this account are intended to extend the boundaries of
technology and open new avenues for discovery for the science and
engineering community. Initial concept and development, and follow
on operations and maintenance costs of the facilities are provided
through the Research and Related Activities (R&RA)."
"Among Federal agencies, NSF plays a major role in providing
the academic (non-medical) research community with access to forefront
instrumentation and facilities. In recent years, NSF has received
an increased number of requests for major research facilities and
equipment from the S&E community. Many of these requests have
been rated outstanding by research peers, program staff, management
and policy officials, and the National Science Board. NSF's request
for the MREFC Account fully funds the ongoing projects and the remaining
three projects approved for funding by the National Science Board
[NSB], but not yet funded, and positions the agency to meet the future
needs and opportunities of the research community.
"Once a project has been submitted for MREFC funding,
it must undergo a multi-phase review and approval process. The process
begins with a review by the MREFC Panel, which makes recommendations
to the NSF Director with attention to criteria such as scientific
merit, importance, readiness and cost-benefit. The Director then selects
candidates for National Science Board (NSB) consideration. The NSB
then approves, or not, projects for inclusion in future budget requests
and establishes priorities. The Director selects from the group of
NSB-approved projects those appropriate for inclusion in a budget
request to OMB, and after discussion with OMB, to the Congress.
" In order for a project to be considered for MREFC
funding, NSF requires that it represent an exceptional opportunity
that enables research and education. In addition, the project should
be transformative in nature, in that it should have the potential
to shift the paradigm in scientific understanding and/or infrastructure
technology. NSF believes that all the projects included in this Budget
Request meet these criteria.
"As a general framework for priority-setting, NSF assigned
priority to projects based on the following criteria:
"First Priority: Ongoing Projects Projects where outyear
funding for the full project has already been included in a Budget
Request to Congress, and projects that have received initial funding
for startup
"Second Priority: NSB-Approved New Starts New projects
that have received NSB approval for inclusion in a budget request
but which have not yet been included in a budget request or received
funding.
"NSF believes that the highest priority within the MREFC
Account must be the current projects. To that end, highest priority
in FY 2004 is to continue to request funding for:" (All figures
in Millions)
ALMA Construction: FY04 request - $50.8; FY03 request - $30.0; FY02
actual - $12.5
Earthscope: FY04 request - $45.0; FY03 request - $35.0
HIAPER Aircraft - FY04 request - $25.5; FY02 actual - $35.0
IceCube Neutrino Observatory: FY04 request - $60.0; FY02 actual - $10.1
Network for Earthquake Eng.: FY04 request - $8.0; FY03 request:$13.6;
FY02 - $24.4
NEON: FY04 request: $12.0; FY03 request - $12.0
South Pole Station: FY04 request - $1.0; FY03 request - $6.0; FY02 actual
- $15.6
The document also states: "In addition, three new starts are
requested in FY 2005 and FY 2006. In priority order, these are: Scientific
Ocean Drilling in FY 2005; Rare Symmetry Violating Processes in FY 2006:
and Ocean Observatories in FY 2006."
The NSF is not requesting FY 2004 funding for the Large Hadron Collider
since the foundation's contribution should be fulfilled with FY 2003
funding.
U.S. POLAR RESEARCH PROGRAMS:
The Bush Administration is requesting an increase in the FY 2004 U.S.
Polar Research Programs budget of 11.1%, or $26.1 million, as compared
to the FY 2003 request. The $261.9 million request is13.6% higher than
the activity's FY 2002 budget. As previously explained, the FY 2003
appropriations bill for the National Science Foundation has not been
enacted.
There are five components to this program. Details on each can be found
beginning on page 321 in the budget submission to Congress at http//:www.nsf.gov/bfa/bud/fy2004/toc.htm
:
Arctic Research Program: The FY 2004 request of $40.8 million is 7.7%,
or $2.9 million, over the FY 2003 request. This is an increase of 13.6%,
or $4.9 million, over the FY 2002 budget.
Arctic Research Support and Logistics: The FY 2004 request of $29.0
million is 11.5%, or $3.0 million, over the FY 2003 request. This is
an increase of 5.1%, or $1.4 million, over the FY 2002 budget.
Arctic Research Commission: The FY 2004 request of $1.2 million is
10.2%, or $0.1 million, over the FY 2003 request. This is an increase
of 16.7%, or $0.2 million, over the FY 2002 budget.
Antarctic Research Grants Program: The FY 2004 request of $44.2 million
is 9.3%, or $3.8 million, over the FY 2003 request. This is an increase
of 10.9%, or $4.3 million, over the FY 2002 budget.
Antarctic Operations and Science Support: The FY 2004 request of $146.7
million is 12.5%, or $16.3 million, over the FY 2003 request. This is
an increase of 16.3%, or $20.6 million, over the FY 2002 budget.
Richard M. Jones
Media and Government Relations Division
American Institute of Physics
fyi@aip.org
(301) 209-3095