It did not take long for the Coalition on National Science Funding
to issue a letter critical of the draft FY 2005 VA, HUD and Independent
Agencies Appropriations Bill that would cut next year's National Science
Foundation budget by 2%. CNSF, a well-recognized coalition of over 90
professional societies, universities, and corporations, has long been
active in advocating for the National Science Foundation. The American
Institute of Physics and several of its Member Societies - the American
Astronomical Society, American Geophysical Society, American Physical
Society, and Optical Society of America - are CNSF members. The coalition's
website is http://www.cnsfweb.org/
The following is the full text of the July 22 CNSF statement that was
sent to the Members of the House of Representatives:
"The Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF) is
extremely concerned with the FY 2005 U.S. House of Representatives
VA-HUD and Independent Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee budget
mark for the National Science Foundation (NSF). This mark of $5.47
billion is two percent less than the current FY 2004 NSF budget and
is five percent less than the President's FY 2005 budget request for
the NSF. Reduction in the NSF budget will curtail many current research
efforts and inhibit new program starts - putting at risk this country's
leadership in many scientific fields.
"This budget action is diametrically opposite of Public
Law (PL) 107-368, authorizing a doubling of the NSF budget over five
years. This action is also contrary to the sentiment of a recent bipartisan
Dear Colleague' letter sent to VA-HUD Subcommittee Chairman
Walsh and Ranking Minority Member Mollohan this spring, signed by
157 Members of the House of Representatives, asking that the NSF be
considered for a significant budget increase [see http://www.aip.org/fyi/2004/046.html].
"We urge the full House Appropriations Committee and
the full House of Representatives to provide a significant increase
to the NSF budget during consideration of the VA-HUD bill. We ask
that this increase reflect the spirit of PL 107-368 and the recent
Dear Colleague' letter.
"Chairman Walsh and Ranking Minority Member Mollohan
are supporters of the NSF. Their support over the last several years
has helped the NSF budget grow to its current level. The CNSF realizes
that the FY 2005 mark is mostly the product of an inadequate allocation
to the VA-HUD Subcommittee. However, even in tough budget environments,
adequate investment in the nation's research enterprise should be
a priority.
"The NSF is one or our nation's greatest tools for the
promotion and advancement of scientific, mathematical, and engineering
research and education. Although NSF accounts for only 4% of federal
R&D spending, it supports nearly 50% of the non-medical basic
research at our colleges and universities. It funds research in new
frontiers of scientific inquiry and contributes to creating a highly
skilled, competitive workforce in science and engineering. It is imperative
that the NSF be adequately funded so that the nation's research enterprise
is robust."