House Science Committee

On June 28, during consideration of the fiscal year 1994 VA/HUD
appropriations bill, the House of Representatives rejected by a
vote of 196-220 an amendment to terminate funding for the space
station (see FYI #91).  Below are selected quotes from the floor
debate on the amendment:       

13 Jul 1993

By an unexpectedly wide margin on June 28, the House of
Representatives rejected an amendment to terminate funding for
Space Station Freedom.  The vote came on an amendment offered by
Rep. Tim Roemer (D-Indiana) and Rep. Dick Zimmer (R-New Jersey) to
delete station funding from H.R. 2491, the VA, HUD Appropriations
bill for FY 1994.  The amendment was rejected by a vote of 220 to
196.  This margin was somewhat of a surprise, since last week the
House voted to authorize space station funding by only a one vote
margin.    

1 Jul 1993

It is expected that the Senate will vote in September on H.R. 2445,
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill for fiscal
year 1994.  During the Senate's consideration of this legislation,
an amendment is expected to be offered to delete funding for the
SSC.  In response to several inquiries regarding last year's voting
record, the following 1992 Senate roll call vote is provided.  A
YES vote was in support of the SSC; a NO vote was for termination
of the collider.  Freshman senators (FS) who were formerly

29 Jun 1993

On June 24, the House of Representatives voted to terminate the
Superconducting Super Collider (see FYI #82).  This vote was taken
on an amendment to H.R. 2445, offered by Rep. Jim Slattery
(D-Kansas), to reduce SSC funding by $400 million, with the
remaining money to be used for shut-down costs.  The amendment was
adopted by a vote of 280-150.

29 Jun 1993

By a vote of 280 to 150, the House of Representatives voted
yesterday to terminate the Superconducting Super Collider.  This
vote came during consideration of H.R. 2445, the Energy and Water
Development Appropriations Bill for fiscal year 1994.  Earlier this
week, the House rejected, by a one vote margin, an amendment which
would have killed the space station.

22 Jun 1993

It is difficult to tell if over six hours of exhausting testimony
yesterday before the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
did much to change any minds about the superconducting super
collider.  Billed as a hearing to examine the merits, economic
potential, and funding requirements for the collider, the
impressive turnout by Members at the beginning of the hearing
dwindled to only three or four by its conclusion. 

27 May 1993

At a jam-packed press conference this morning, House science
committee chairman George Brown (D-California) announced that "the
Freedom-derived Station is the only design I intend to support."
Although not a surprise because of his past support for the space
station, Brown's statement is significant.  One, he is clearly not
backing away from the station.  Two, Brown is signaling to the
administration his strong preferences about the design outcome he
wants.  Brown said that while he would not actively oppose a

20 May 1993

On March 12, House science committee chairman George E. Brown
(D-CA) gave a provocative speech on science policy advice.  The
occasion was a meeting to discuss a new report of the Carnegie
Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, "Facing Toward
Governments: Nongovernmental Organizations and Scientific and
Technical Advice" (call the commission at 212-998-2150 for a copy
of the report.)  Selections from Brown's speech follow:

19 Mar 1993

Within the next few weeks, Congress will start consideration of
legislation important to the science community.  The following
recommendations for effective communications are from the AIP
brochure, "Communicating with Congress."  Please send a stamped,
self-addressed, business-sized envelope for a copy of the full
brochure to: AIP Office of Government & Institutional Relations;
1630 Connecticut Avenue, NW; Suite 750; Washington, D.C.  20009.

WRITING TO A MEMBER OF CONGRESS:

11 Mar 1993

I have been on somewhat of a crusade against unauthorized,
location-specific appropriations to academic institutions which
bypass congressional debate and legitimate processes of peer review
or merit review.
    --George Brown

24 Feb 1993

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - House Science Committee