Oral History Transcript — Dr. Dmitrij Volkov
This transcript may not be quoted, reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part by any means except with the written permission of the American Institute of Physics.
This transcript is based on a taperecorded interview deposited at the Center for History of Physics of the American Institute of Physics. The AIP's interviews have generally been transcribed from tape, edited by the interviewer for clarity, and then further edited by the interviewee. If this interview is important to you, you should consult earlier versions of the transcript or listen to the original tape. For many interviews, the AIP retains substantial files with further information about the interviewee and the interview itself. Please contact us for information about accessing these materials.
Please bear in mind that: 1) This material is a transcript of the spoken word rather than a literary product; 2) An interview must be read with the awareness that different people's memories about an event will often differ, and that memories can change with time for many reasons including subsequent experiences, interactions with others, and one's feelings about an event. Disclaimer: This transcript was scanned from a typescript, introducing occasional spelling errors. The original typescript is available.
Access form  Project support  How to cite  Print this page
See the catalog record for this interview and search for other interviews in our collection

Dmitrij Volkov; March 4, 1995
ABSTRACT: A thorough, reflective survey of the life and work D.V. Volkov  an outstanding scientist in the field of theoretical physics, who is one of the discoverers of parastatistics (1959), supersymmetry (1972) and supergravity (1973). In this last interview (Volkov died 5 January 1996) he recollects early life and education in Leningrad 19251943. Participation in the Second World War from 1943 to 1945 where he was a soldier and fought in Karelia and the Far East, in Manchuria. Passing examinations without attending lectures for secondary school and entering the Physical Department of the Leningrad State University. Higher education at the Department of Nuclear Physics of the Kharkiv State University. After the graduation from the University a postgraduate student of academician O.I. Akhieser. Successfully defense of his candidate thesis devoted to problems of the quantum electrodynamics of scalar particles. More than 40 years of work at the Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology from junior researcher to academician. The reasons which led in Volkov to the discovery of supersymmetry and supergravity. Supersymmetry  a symmetry of new type which unifies the spacetime and spin degrees of freedom. This unification demanded the creation of a new branch of mathematics  supermathematics, which was developed by the Soviet mathematicians F. Berezin and V. Kac. Volkov talks about the development of the group methods of E. Cartan and their application to the description of nonlinear interactions between bosonic goldstone particles in high energy physics (pions, kaons) and solid state physics (magnons). The generalization of these methods for fermionic goldstone fields led him to the ideas of the Poincare supergroup and superspace as a space which contains additional grassmannian coordinates.
Transcript
Ranyuk:
My conversation today is with the renowned scientist and academician Dmitry Vasiljevitch Volkov, head of the theoretical laboratory of the Kharkov PhysicalTechnical Institute (KhFTI). Dmitry Vasiljevitch, could you tell me, please, what was your path into theoretical science, how did you become a theoretician, and was this accidental or was there any specific cause.Volkov:
I was born in Leningrad. When I was 16 years old and when I was studying in the 8th class, the Great Patriotic War began. I was evacuated from Leningrad. These were very difficult years for young people. In this period I came to work on a collective farm and in a military factory. After that I was drafted into the army and took part as a soldier in the war on the Karelian front, above the polar circle. When the war began with Japan, I participated in military action on the Far Eastern front. I want to say that the war had a considerable influence on my attitude to life. In my generation the war created a feeling of responsibility for the country. After the war we carried over the same ideology into civilian life. When the question of a choice of profession arose, many of us thought about how we might be useful to our country. During all the war years I dreamed about going into science, because already in school I was attracted especially to the exact sciences: mathematics and physics. After the demobilization I entered Leningrad State University, in the faculty of physics. At that time prominent scientists such as V.A. Fok and T.P. Kravets were teaching there.
The lectures of T.P. Kravets were distinguished by his ability to link the study material with personal moments. He taught us that physics is created by living people and he spoke much about his teacher Lebedev. From the first days Kravets infected us with a deep love for science, and for physics in particular. Aside from that, I listened to the lectures of V.I. Smirnov, whose widely known multivolume works were specially intended for theoretical physicists, and, in fact, formed the basis of our whole education. We learned a lot from other mathematicians of his school: O.A. Ladyzhenskaya, M.I. Petrashen. In the final year I received a profound training in the specialization of theoretical physics thanks to the excellent teacher L.E. Gurevitch. There were also other teachers, which I remember to this time with thankfulness. Unfortunately, a great tragedy happened in Leningrad when I was studying there, and this had an impact on my further destiny. It is now commonly known that at the end of the forties took place the socalled Leningrad trial, as a result of which prominent party leaders and representatives of the scientific and cultural community of the city were repressed, and among their number were leading scientists of Leningrad University.
Therefore, the group in which I was studying was dissolved and the scientific line on which I was working ceased to exist there. Here one should give credit to the Kharkov scientists. From the very beginning, the Kharkov scientists had close contacts with their colleagues in Leningrad. In particular, it is known, that our Institute, KhFTI, was organized thanks to the arrival in Kharkov of the group of scientists headed by the wellknown physicists Kirill Dmitrievitch Sinelnikov, Anton Karlovitch Walter and others. One of the major concerns at the foundation of the Institute was how to attract young people so that in the future the Institute would be staffed by highly qualified scientists. Therefore a special representative came to Leningrad and our students were offered the possibility to move to Kharkov and to continue their studies there. I agreed. Together with me came the already wellknown scientists E.V. Inopin, K.N. Stepanov, V.F. Alexin and some other students.
Ranyuk:
Dmitry Vasiljevitch, in which year of your studies did this happen?Volkov:
This was after the fourth year. I finished the fourth year in Leningrad, and in the fifth year I was already studying at Kharkov University. Education here was also carried out on a high level. Lectures were given by outstanding lecturers and popularisers of science, such as, e.g. Alexander Iljitch Akhiezer. The lectures of L.N. Rosenzweig made a special impression upon me. He was a man of sparkling wit, and, besides that, he was aware of the latest developments, which were taking place in physics. And at this time, physics was receiving an extremely interesting boost connected with the discovery of new elementary particles, and, in fact, the physics of elementary particles was going through its birth period. This was a very interesting period. Lipa Natanovitch was fascinated by this new physics and imagine that while we were still students, he came to a lecture, and, instead of reading to us material according to the programme, took a fresh article from the “Physical Review” and summarized it to us. Aside from that, he would even give these articles to us young students to learn from and to discuss in seminars.Ranyuk:
Dmitry Vasiljevitch, when did you move to Kharkov, and how did your further scientific interests develop?Volkov:
I moved to Kharkov in 1951. Now, about my scientific interests and their development. During my student years, the mathematical aspects of science attracted me even more than the physical ones. At that time I had already developed a deep feeling for the general theory of relativity. Quantum field theory was just beginning. Just at this same time the development of physics received some sharp impacts. On the one hand, quantum electrodynamics was effectively reborn thanks to the theory of renormalization, and, on the other hand, the physics of new particles arose. At this time the pimeson was observed and the neutral pi0meson was discovered and discussions on the definition of spin and parity were going on. This was a real revolution in science. Later on, after graduation from university, I began my graduate training. My advisor was A.I. Akhiezer. He organized a small group of graduate students, including R. Polovin, P. Fomin, V. Alexin and me. All of us actively studied quantum electrodynamics. This was especially important for me, because I continued to work in this area and quantum electrodynamics became for me a sort of initial example of the theories that I work on now.
I would like to discuss in some more detail the directions of science that interested me most and on which I worked later. I don’t know why  somehow intuitively  but already in my years of study my favorite subject was connected with the theory of symmetry groups. At that time, the theory of symmetry groups was already being adopted in physics, but not widely enough. Later on, the application of this theory came into a full flowering, especially when many new elementary particles were discovered and the question of systematizing them on the basis of symmetry groups became very important. When I started to work, there were no powerful group theoretical methods. The first pieces of work that I consider to be somehow connected to what I am doing now were concerned with the properties of particles with high spin. I would like to emphasize that questions that were also related to supersymmetry interested me already at the earliest stage of my activity. How do particles with different spin differ one from another? Why are there bosons; why are there fermions? I remember, in part, that just when I learned about the group SU(3), it amazed me that the multiplets of this group contained simultaneously particles with integral and with halfintegral isospin. I was already trying to do something in this direction, replacing isotopic spin with ordinary spin, that is, actually, the idea that now lies at the basis of supersymmetry.
An important role in the conception of the idea of supersymmetry was played by work on phenomenological Lagrangians, in which the interactions of Goldstone particles in the presence of spontaneous symmetry breaking are practically uniquely described by geometrical grouptheoretical methods. I actively participated in the development of this line; it fascinated me very much. At the same time, the ideology of gauge fields started to penetrate actively into physics and I returned to the old questions. It amazed me that all these particles, the Goldstone particles and the gauge fields, were bosons, but the fermions somehow were not involved at all. Here, a kind of inequality appeared: why were some particles  bosons  selected, but others  fermions  not included in this group? This was a key moment, because the very thought that fermions can also be Goldstone particles or gauge fields contained in itself somehow the answer: if it were clear how to build a general scheme of Goldstone particles with integral spin, then upon making the transition to fermions one should replace the corresponding operators with operators firstly carrying spin onehalf and secondly being anticommuting, in accordance with their fermionic nature; and in fact I did this. After that, when this was done, I, together with my coauthors V. Akulov and V. Soroka, considered first the global properties of supersymmetric theories and their local properties. I would like to say that I worked not only on the theory of symmetry groups, but I also had pieces of work on nuclear physics and even on the theory of accelerators, but, nevertheless, the theory of symmetry groups has always been my favorite subject. And certainly, my main work was connected with the application of this theory to the physics of elementary particles. By main, I mean my work on the establishment of parastatistics, work on the discovery of the conspiracy of Regge poles, and on the application of symmetry groups to the classification of hadronic resonances, that is, to baryonic and mesonic resonances.
But my most important result, which is the most widelyknown one now in the world, is certainly the discovery of a new symmetry group  supersymmetry  and the extension of this to aspects of the general theory of relativity, the socalled supergravity. I can speak about this in some more detail. First, a couple of words about how I came to the discovery of supersymmetry and supergravity. The starting point was the idea of W. Heisenberg. Let me tell you what this idea was. At the end of the 60’s, Heisenberg proposed the idea that all elementary particles can be described by a uniform theory on the basis of the nonlinear equation formulated by him. He started this work together with W. Pauli, but sometime later Pauli dissociated himself from this theory and even sharply criticized Heisenberg for his assumptions. But, nevertheless what did Heisenberg contribute to the discovery of supersymmetry? Heisenberg tried to explain the spectrum of all elementary particles on the basis of his theory. And thanks to his great intuition, he guessed the places of the particles and predicted how the photon should appear in this theory. Moreover, he found a place for the neutrino within his theory and assumed that the neutrino emerges as a result of spontaneous symmetry breaking. This was a very unusual assumption, because all known Goldstone particles emerging as a result of spontaneous symmetry breaking had spin zero in all theories known at that time.
This idea of Heisenberg was revolutionary, because he was the first to formulate that the thought that there might exist Goldstone particles in nature with spin onehalf. To tell the truth, he found this particle by an incorrect method, but nonetheless it was an idea that had a strong impact on me and from that time I often although not constantly would think about whether this idea could be realized. And when I started to consider how such a particle might appear in the theory, I understood that this requires an extension of the usual physical groups, which is the basis for all relativistic processes. That means an extension of the Lorentz group and an extension of the Poincare group so that new operators would be present, which would correspond to a quantum number of the neutrino. Thus, the main result that we obtained was that we managed to create such an extension of the Poincare group, which is now called the Poincare supergroup. Later on, we encountered certain difficulties and, if one speaks about the direct application to the neutrino, this idea nonetheless did not work. Why? Because the group that we were considering contained the Poincare group and it is known that the Poincare group leads eventually to the general theory of relativity, if one considers the local transformations of this group.
That means that the same local transformations of the supergroup would lead to the emergence of certain superpartners of the ordinary gravity field, and these superpartners would totally absorb the Goldstone particles. And thus, when I understood such ideas, I, together with my collaborators, proposed an extension even of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which would include just what we call supersymmetry. So, in fact, certain superpartners would emerge. Moreover, in the extension of this theory arose not only superpartners  particles with spin 3/2  but also particles with spin 1, with spin 1/2 and with spin zero. That is, there arose the idea that all elementary particles might be included into the system of supergravity. Now, many scientists all over the world are working on it. Different variants of supergravity are being considered and also different variants of superstring theory, which are based on a certain extension of supergravity that takes into account the fact that elementary particles can be not simply point objects but also extended objects. This direction is now the main direction in theoretical physics and proposes that there is a unified theory of all elementary particles, based on one common principle  namely on local supersymmetry. Heisenberg’s idea was, if one can say so, a physical idea, but in order to give this idea shape in a new precise mathematical theory, a certain mathematical formalism was required. And here I am very thankful to J. Schwinger, whom I personally knew, and who in a number of cases could have discovered supersymmetry.
Moreover, I have recently seen an article by Schwinger, in which he writes why he didn’t discover supersymmetry in spite of the fact that he was completely ready for it. Why did I think that Schwinger could have discovered supersymmetry? Firstly, he introduced the concept of certain anticommuting variables, which played the roles of physical variables in field theory. He was the first to do this. Secondly, when I was saying that in supergravity the superpartner of the gravity field appears, well, these superpartners are particles of spin 3/2, and the theory of such spin 3/2 particles was first developed by Schwinger. It is even called the RaritaSchwinger theory. Recently, I received this article by Schwinger in which he writes about the reasons why he did not discover supersymmetry. Schwinger also says that he was very close to the discovery of supersymmetry and explains why. At the same time, in response to a general question as to why he didn’t do it, which he received from the audience in an auditorium, he answered that this is a philosophical question and that this philosophy of discoveries is discussed in a number of monographs and that he could give only a general answer to the question. The next moment that played an immense role in the mathematical formulation of supersymmetry, this was the work of the greatest French mathematician Elie Cartan. He created a special formalism of differential geometry, which seems to be specially appropriate for the system that I was considering. This particular circumstance, that I knew this work very well, helped me to create the mathematical formalism of supersymmetry. So, I think that there were actually three sources that helped me to develop the theory of supersymmetry and the theory of supergravity: the idea of Heisenberg, the idea of Schwinger and the mathematical idea of the great mathematician Elie Cartan.