American Institute of Physics
SEARCH AIP
home contact us sitemap
Physics News Update
Number 242, September 28, 1995 by Phillip F. Schewe and Ben Stein

NEW TESTS OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL THEORY IN PHYSICS show the need for improved information on the proton. Stringently verified for five decades now, quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the modern theory of the atom. QED was initially developed to explain the "Lamb shift" in the hydrogen atom, in which an electron orbiting a proton experiences a slight energy shift due to the interaction between the electron and the teeming virtual particles residing in the surrounding vacuum. Modern experimental measurements have become so precise that theoretical calculations of the Lamb shift can no longer consider the proton as a pointlike charge but must instead view it as a sphere in which positive charge is spread out. In the energy states commonly studied in the Lamb shift, the electron actually has a probability of spending some time inside the proton, whose size, unfortunately, is not known to better than about 8%. Using high-resolution laser spectroscopy, Yale researchers (contact Malcolm Boshier, 203-432-3828) have measured the hydrogen Lamb shift to a new record accuracy of six parts per million. Their value (8,172,827 kHz, expressed in units of frequency) agrees with QED providing they incorporate a relatively large proton radius, such as the one measured in Mainz (Germany), 0.862 x 10**-15 m. However, a significant discrepancy between QED and the new Lamb shift result cannot be ruled out until the proton size is pinpointed to within 1 or 2 percent. According to Boshier, "It is...far from clear that everything is okay with QED," particularly when one considers that experimental measurements of another Lamb shift, that for the He+ ion, violently disagree with the theory. "The motivation for Lamb shift measurements is the search for new physics," he adds. (D.J. Berkeland, E.A. Hinds, and M.G. Boshier, Physical Review Letters, 25 September 1995, see also Physical Review Letters, 18 December 1995.)

SOME MATERIALS MIGHT EXHIBIT TWO KINDS OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY. At low temperatures electrons in certain materials pair up. The pairs, condensing into a single macroscopic quantum state, constitute a supercurrent which does not lose energy, through interactions with the lattice of atoms forming the material. In low-temperature superconductors the electron pairs are said to be in an "s wave" state, one in which the electrons have no angular momentum relative to each other. Some theorists believe that the pairing mechanism is different in high-temperature cuprate superconductivity and that the pairs exist in a different state called a "d wave." Indeed, recent experiments trying to settle the issue lean toward the d-wave explanation, but the results have not been definitive. Now, K. Alex Muller of IBM proposes that in some materials both kinds of superconductivity may be at work. That is, two types of superconductivity may occur at the same transition temperature in the same material. (K. Alex Muller, Nature, 14 September 1995.)

WHERE DOES THE SOLAR CORONA GET ITS ENERGY? Scientists have long been puzzled by the fact that the corona is much hotter than the sun's visible surface. Astronomers viewing new observations of individual coronal loops recorded with the orbiting Yokhoh x-ray telescope deduce that the rate of loop heating scales inversely with the square of the loop length. Establishing this scaling law sets the stage for the next step in arriving at an understanding of coronal heating. This will be the direct measurement of the strengths of arching magnetic fields which rise out of the sun and twist the coronal loops into their barber's pole shapes. (James Klimchuk and Lisa Porter, Nature, 14 Sept.)