DARK ENERGY AND THE MICROWAVE BACKGROUND. The theory of general relativity introduced the notion that spacetime could be warped or curved by the presence of matter. Locally, stars or any object with mass will curve space, but the expansion of the universe itself may introduce a curvature of its own. This is how cosmologists summarize things: a static universe with no matter (if such a thing were possible) would have no curvature. If, however, the empty universe were expanding it would have negative overall curvature. Increase the mass density from zero and the curvature would be less negative. Add still more mass and you might reach a net zero curvature.
The ratio of matter to the critical matter needed for zero curvature is called omega; the popular version of the big bang model, featuring a very rapid expansion in an early "inflation" phase, predicts that omega should equal 1 exactly. A new paper in Physical Review Letters by Scott Dodelson of Fermilab and Lloyd Knox of the University of Chicago (773-834-3287) provides the theoretical underpinning for the higher-precision mappings of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) reported over the past nine months. The paper was prepared just as the first of the observational results appeared last summer: a Princeton-Pennsylvania collaboration taking data from Cerro Toco in Chile. Their findings (preprint astro-ph/9906421) can be plotted as the size of the observed fluctuations in the CMB as a function of the angular size of the fluctuation region (actually astrophysicists usually transform the data so that it can be plotted against the size of angular moment, or "l").
These data and those of the "Boomerang" (preprint 9911444 and 9911445; also see Update 460) and "Viper" (preprint 9910503) groups sit right on top of a theoretical curve drawn by Dodelson and Knox corresponding to the case where omega equals 1 and the net curvature of the universe is zero. With the contribution of matter (luminous and dark) to the density of the universe expected to be about one-third the critical value (of omega=1), this presents a stronger-than-ever argument in favor of the existence of yet another form of energy, often called "dark energy," to provide the missing two-thirds of the energy needed to make omega=1. This dark energy would also provide the "negative pressure" or repulsiveness needed to make the expansion of the universe greater than in the past, a development suggested independently by studies of distant supernovas. (Dodelson and Knox, Physical Review Letters, 17 April; Select Article.)