Number 560, October 9, 2001
by Phil Schewe, James Riordon, and Ben Stein
The 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics
The 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics goes to Eric Cornell of NIST/JILA,
Wolfgang Ketterle of MIT, and Carl Wieman of Colorado/JILA (JILA is
an institute run jointly by NIST and the University of Colorado). Cornell
and Wieman are recognized for their being the first to achieve a Bose-Einstein
condensate (BEC) in neutral atoms (Science,
14 July 1995; see Physics News Update 233).
Ketterle soon thereafter produced a larger BEC (Davis et al., Physical Review Letters, 27 November 1995) and has made extensive
study of BEC properties.
The BEC phenomenon, foreseen by Satyendra Bose and Albert Einstein
in the 1920s, can come about when atoms are chilled to very low temperatures.
Quantum theory holds that the wavelike nature of atoms allows them to
spread out and even overlap. Indeed at a high enough density and a low
enough temperature (billionths of degrees above absolute zero) the atoms
can, like the photons in a laser, enter into a common quantum state
with a common energy. In other words, the atoms are all coordinated
(coherent) with each other and constitute a single "super atom."
BEC was possible experimentally when in a magneto-optic trap (MOT),
a combination of laser cooling (a web of laser beams hitting the atoms
from many directions) and evaporative cooling (a web of magnetic fields
encourage the warmer atoms to depart, leaving the cooler atoms to coalesce
in the trap) brought about unprecedentedly low temperatures. BEC is
still largely restricted to fundamental research in physics labs, but
numerous potential applications beckon, such as the use of BEC beams
("atom lasers") for doing high-resolution lithography for
microchips, interferometry (navigation, gravity wave detectors, etc.),
high-precision clocks, and "atomtronics" (atoms sent around
a microchip or down hollow fibers).
Physics News Update
has covered BEC research extensively. Examples include BEC as a superfluid
(Update 449),
rudimentary atom laser (305),
amplifying atom waves (465),
all-optical BECs (545),
switching BEC interactions from negative to positive (producing miniature
"supernovas," Update 530),
BEC on a microchip (559),
BEC as an immiscible liquid (402),
hydrogen BEC (382),
lithium BEC (237),
helium BEC (532),
tunable chemistry (362),
sound waves in BEC (319),
slowed light in a BEC (472),
quantum evaporation (356),
and continuous atom laser beam (422).
(Background: Wieman and Cornell, Scientific
American, March 1998; see also Royal Swedish Academy press
release.)
Quantum Fingerprinting
Imagine two offices, located halfway around the world, and their headquarters
wants to make sure that they each have the identical copy of a database.
Imagine further that the databases are huge--1020 bits each.
They could transmit the database to the headquarters, and the headquarters
could compare them. But transmitting 1020 bits--equal to
about 11 billion gigabytes-would take an enormous amount of time.
There is a method in which they only need to send 1010 bits--a
little over a gigabyte--and the headquarters still gets enough information
to determine that they have the exact same database. This method is
called "classical fingerprinting." The idea is that each office
independently, without communicating to each other, generates a distinctive
number, called a fingerprint, by performing a calculation involving
the entire database and locally generated random numbers, called keys.
The result of the calculation-a fingerprint of 1010 bits--is
then sent to the headquarters.
Now, a Dutch-Canadian team (Harry Buhrman, CWI/University of Amsterdam,
011-31-20-5924076, buhrman@cwi.nl) has suggested a "quantum fingerprinting"
scheme which would involve an exponentially smaller transmission of
information to do the same job. For the 1020 bit database,
each office would only have to transmit a fingerprint of about 70 "quantum
bits" (qubits), which could be, for example, specially prepared
photons. Such photons could contain the result of a computation between
the database and many different random keys simultaneously, rather than
a single random key.
The researchers say that one could demonstrate this new fingerprinting
technique with quantum computers not much more complex than the ones
that exist today. Buhrman estimates that quantum fingerprinting becomes
more efficient than classical fingerprinting in a quantum computer with
5 to 10 qubits. (H.
Buhrman; R. Cleve; J. Watrous; R. de Wolf, Physical Review Letters,
15 Oct. 2001.)