Not all chaos on the weather map is equal, researchers have found,
providing insights that are hoped to improve weather forecasting. Researchers
usually assume that all spots on a weather map are equally chaotic,
meaning that small uncertainties in initial conditions grow to the point
at which the conditions become unpredictable. Now, a multidisciplinary
University of Maryland team of meteorologists, physicists, and computer
scientists (DJ Patil, 301-405-4842, dpatil@ipst.umd.edu)
has developed a technique that identifies what can be considered as
chaos "hotspots," regions in which small changes in conditions
are believed to magnify most quickly into large perturbations in the
weather.
Chaos hotspots shift their location on a regular basis, but tend to
cover only about 20% of the global map at any given time. Making more
meteorological observations in hotspots can help reduce forecasting
errors, the researchers believe. Since 1992, the National Weather Service
has provided "ensemble forecasts," in which a computer model
generates a main forecast and several slightly adjusted forecasts providing
a range of possible outcomes for the weather. The Maryland researchers
look at global wind predictions from five of these forecasts at a particular
level in the atmosphere (where the pressure is 500 millibars).
Placing these five forecasts on the map, the researchers then look
at wind vectors, which specify how each forecast deviates from the main
forecast in wind strength and direction. Analyzing 1100 km-by-1100 km
squares in a global map, they identify regions where the vectors tend
to line up with one another (see figure at Physics
News Graphics).
The aligned wind vectors have "low dimensionality," transforming
the regions in which they reside into chaos hotspots where good initial
observations become most crucial for reducing forecasting errors. All
other points on the map are less important for forecasting, the authors
say. (Patil
et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 25 June 2001; text at Physics
News Select.)