Number 605, September 18, 2002
by Phil Schewe, James Riordon, and Ben Stein
Cold Anti-Hydrogen Atoms
Cold anti-hydrogen atoms have been made and detected for the first
time in an experiment at CERN. The ATHENA collaboration makes the anti-H
atoms when a swarm of antiprotons is loosed upon a cloud of positrons
held within the same 16-cm-long cylindrical trap. Anti-H atoms announce
their presence when they drift out of the trap region and annihilate
with ordinary atoms in a sort of double suicide. The antiproton perishes
when it meets a regular proton, resulting in the creation of a few pi
mesons detected in silicon microstrips, a process which points to the
annihilation vertex with a precision of 4 mm. Meanwhile the positron
partner from each anti-H meets its separate fate when it collides with
the nearest electron, producing a telltale pair of 511-keV gamma rays
which show up in adjoining CsI crystals. The next step for ATHENA
will be to shine laser light upon its captive sample and determine
from the re-emitted spectrum whether anti-hydrogen behaves like regular
hydrogen.
This is not the first time anti-H atoms have been made. Positron-antiproton
pairs, engendered on the fly amid high energy collisions at CERN and
Fermilab, were observed several years ago (Updates 253,
297).
But these anti-atoms could not be stored or studied since they immediately
annihilated with regular atoms. Hence the need to slow down antiprotons
(made at extremely high energies) and to store them in a dedicated facility
such as CERN's Antiproton Decelerator (AD), where several experiments
are underway to study anti-atoms. In February 2002, one of those experiments,
conducted by the ATRAP
collaboration had attained many of the conditions needed for storing
anti-H atoms but were not yet in a position to detect them directly
(see Update
577). ATHENA estimates that they make about 50,000 anti-hydrogen
atoms, having used a contingent of about 1.5 million antiprotons. (Amoretti
et al., Nature, posted
online, 18 Sept)
A Solid State Cathode Ray Tube
A solid state cathode ray tube has been made by scientists at Tokyo
University of Agriculture and Technology. Old CRTs, the kind generally
used in TV and computer monitors, consist of bulky boxes containing
guns shooting electrons from a hot cathode (cathode rays) at a phosphor
screen. In the solid state equivalent electrons move ballistically (in
straight lines) through a cascade of porous silicon nanocrystallites.
Moreover, in this setup electrons move perpendicular to the device surface
and are generated so that they strike linear arrays of phosphor pixels,
resulting in truly planar emission of light. Nobuyoshi Koshida argues
that his device, unlike other candidate flat-panel luminescent displays,
possesses all of these important features: it consumes little power,
is silicon-based, produces a sharp picture, is scalable to large areas,
responds quickly, and is cheap because of its simple design. (Nakajima
et al., Applied Physics Letters, 23 Sept; contact
Nobuyoshi Koshida, 81-042-388-7128, koshida@cc.tuat.ac.jp; also see
experimenter's website.)
Fast, Cheap Random Numbers
The keys needed to encrypt credit card transactions and other crucial
information floating in cyberspace often rely on an infusion of random
numbers. Generating true random numbers is actually harder than it seems
since the generation process generally follows some deterministic algorithm,
permitting the possible reappearance of unwanted predictability. James
Gleeson, a physicist at Kent State University (330-672-9592, gleeson@physics.kent.edu)
has come up with a cheap, fast solution. He shoots laser light into
a sample of liquid crystals. But because the sample is subject to a
turbulent flow, causing haphazard fluctuations in the orientation of
the liquid crystals, the digitized transmitted light coming from the
sample represents a stream of random numbers. Gleeson believes that
because his device depends on standard liquid-crystal-display technology,
his compact device can be used for many processes requiring random-number
generation. (Gleeson,
Applied Physics Letters, 9 September 2002.)