American Institute of Physics
SEARCH AIP
home contact us sitemap
Physics News Update
Number 662, November 18, 2003 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and James Riordon


A Liquid Wall in a Fusion Energy Device

A liquid wall in a fusion energy device has improved the performance of fusion fuel, and may lead to more resilient fusion devices. At last month's American Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics meeting in Albuquerque, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory researchers (Dick Majeski, PPPL, 609-243-3112 and Bob Kaita, PPPL, 609-243-3275) described how they tested this idea on the Current Drive Experiment-Upgrade (CDX-U). CDX-U is a spherical torus, a more rotund version of the well-known tokamak. Like the donut-shaped tokamak, the device uses magnetic fields to confine hot plasma. At the bottom of their tubby tokamak, the researchers placed a pool of liquid lithium. Meanwhile, they applied electrical current to the plasma both to create strong magnetic fields that confine it and also to heat the plasma to desired hot temperatures. In contact with the fusion plasma, the liquid lithium increased the efficiency of transferring the current to the plasma, leading to less wasted energy. It also does an excellent job of absorbing impurities, such as carbon and oxygen, which could otherwise cool the plasma. What's more, it absorbs hydrogen plasma that reaches it, requiring the researchers continually to pump in hydrogen gas. This is actually a good thing, as it prevents an undesirable buildup of cool hydrogen at the plasma boundary which could return to the plasma and lower its temperature. Finally, since the liquid surface can be continually replenished, the liquid wall is not subject to the same degradation and damage that would occur by neutrons that bombard a solid metal wall. The liquid wall can conceivably be applied to future magnetic fusion reactors, whether a spherical torus, a tokamak, or another design. (Meeting paper RI1.004; see picture; also see R. Majeski et al., Journal of Nuclear Materials, March 2003.)


Electron Spins Can Control Nuclear Spins

Electron spins can control nuclear spins in a semiconductor when trapped in a very confined space, a recent experimental development which calls upon laser science, solid-state physics, and nuclear magnetic resonance. David Awschalom and his colleagues at the Center for Spintronics and Quantum Computation at UC Santa Barbara begin by lithographically creating a quantum well, an extremely thin, practically two-dimensional region inside a semiconductor capable of trapping electrons. First, a laser pulse injects polarized electrons (their spins have a definite orientation determined by the laser's polarization) into the well. Once in the well, the tiny disk of electrons (with a radius of about 20 microns but a thickness of only 20 nm) can be controllably moved along one axis, much as an abacus bead can be slid along a wire, by simply changing a voltage. In this case, the disk can be positioned with nm-accuracy. The nuclei of atoms residing within the thin volume occupied by the spin-polarized electrons will in turn be polarized; that is, the spin of these nuclei will tend to align themselves with the spin of the electrons. The result is an extremely thin---equivalent to the thickness of several tens of atoms--- region of polarized nuclei which can be precisely positioned by changing a single voltage. These thin sheets of nuclear polarization could constitute the basic elements of an information storage device in which nuclear spin determines the logical state of the system. One may ask, why not take out the "middle man" and just use the electron spin to encode information? The answer: nuclear spins have a weaker interaction with the surrounding environment than electron spins. While harder to flip, once oriented, nuclear spins preserve their state longer than do electrons. One may also wonder, why not just use some large magnet to orient the nuclear spins? Why use electrons as intermediaries? The answer: all-electronic control of spin is desirable because electric fields are so much easier to control and create on a small scale than magnetic fields. They are scalable and easy to implement, while it is notoriously hard to produce large and localized magnetic fields. In addition, all of our current integrated circuit technology is based on charge and electric field; it would certainly be helpful to manipulate spin using "knobs" which are well developed and familiar to engineers. Awschalom (805-893-2121) believes this current result is the first step toward the establishment of an all-electrical manipulation of countable numbers of nuclear spins.(Poggio et al., Physical Review Letters, 14 November 2003)