Number 736, July 6, 2005
by Phil Schewe and Ben Stein
A Coulomb Experiment for the Weak Nuclear Force
Physicists at the SLAC accelerator have measured, with much greater
precision than ever before, the variation in the weak nuclear force,
one of the four known physical forces, over an enormous size scale (a
distance of more than ten proton diameters) for so feeble a force. Although
the results were not surprising (the weak force diminished with distance
as expected) this new quantitative study of the weak force helps to
cement physicists’ view of the sub-nuclear world.
The SLAC work is,
in effect, a 21st century analog of the landmark 18th experiments in
which the intrinsic strength of the electromagnetic and gravitational
forces were measured (by Charles Coulomb and Henry Cavendish, respectively)
through careful observation of test objects causing a torsion balance
to swing around. The weak force, in the modern way of thinking, is a
cousin of the electromagnetic (EM) force; both of them are considered
as different aspects of a single “electroweak” force.
The EM force is
much better known to physicists and to non-experts: it’s responsible
for all electric, magnetic, and optical phenomena, and keeps atoms intact
and holds atoms together in all the molecular and crystalline forms
which make up our world. Over sizes larger than the atom, the strength
of the EM force is prescribed by Coulomb’s law, which states that the
force between two charged objects (say, two electrons) is proportional
to the charges of the electrons and inversely to the square of the distance
between them.
For sub-atomic distances the Coulomb way of describing
electron scattering gets complicated because of vacuum polarization,
a process which takes into account the fact that at short distances
an electron can longer be portrayed as a lone pointlike particle; instead
we must view it as accompanied by a cloud of virtual particles sprouting
out of the vacuum. These extra short-lived particles serve to redefine,
or “renormalize,” the effective electron charge and along with it the
very nature of the EM force mediating the interaction with the other
electron.
The weak force is an important force---responsible for some
kinds of radioactivity and for select fusion reactions vital to energy
production inside the sun---but is very different from the electromagnetic
force and generally operates only over the tight confines of the nucleus.
In this realm, the weak force is right there along with the EM force,
a doppelganger that can often be ignored because it is so very weak.
But physicists, in search of a fuller explanation of the universe, don’t
want to ignore the weak force.
At SLAC they painstakingly extract weak
effects from the much larger EM effects involved when two electrons
interact. In the case of their present experiment (E158), a powerful
electron beam scatters from electrons bound to hydrogen atoms in a stationary
target. By using electrons that have been spin polarized---that is,
the electron’s internal magnetism (or spin) has been oriented in a certain
direction---the weak force can be studied by looking for subtle asymmetries
in the way electrons with differing polarizations scatter from each
other.
One expects an intrinsic falloff in the weak force with the distance
between the electrons. It should also fall off owing to the cumbersome mass possessed by the Z boson. Finally,
the weak force weakens because the electron's "weak charge" becomes
increasingly shielded (just as the electron’s electrical charge had
been) owing to a polarization of the vacuum---but this time with virtual
quarks, electrons, and W and Z bosons needing to be taken into account.
Previously, the weak charge has been well measured only at a fixed distance
scale, a small fraction of the proton's diameter. The SLAC result over
longer distances confirms the expected falloff. According to E158 researcher
Yury Kolomensky (yury@physics.berkeley.edu), the result is precise enough
to rule out certain theories that invoke new types of interactions,
at least at the energy scale of this experiment. (Anthony et al.,
Physical Review Letters, upcoming article; lab website, http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/e158)
Why Is The Sky Blue, and Not Violet?
The hues that we see in the sky are not only determined by the laws
of physics, but are also colored by the human visual system, shows a
new paper in the American Journal of Physics. On a clear day when the
sun is well above the horizon, the analysis demonstrates, we perceive
the complex spectrum of colors in the sky as a mixture of white light
and pure blue.
When sunlight enters the earth's atmosphere, it scatters
(ricochets) mainly from oxygen and nitrogen molecules that make up most
of our air. What scatters the most is the light with the shortest wavelengths,
towards the blue end of the spectrum, so more of that light will reach
our eyes than other colors. But according to the 19th-century physics
equations introduced by Lord Rayleigh, as well as actual measurements,
our eyes get hit with peak amounts of energy in violet as well as blue.
So what is happening? Combining physics with quantitative data on the
responsiveness of the human visual system, Glenn Smith of Georgia Tech
(glenn.smith@ece.gatech.edu) points to the way in which our eye's three
different types of cones detect color. As Smith shows, the sky's complex
multichromatic rainbow of colors tickles our eye's cones in the same
way as does a specific mixture of pure blue and white light. This is
similar to how the human visual system will perceive the right mixture
of pure red and pure green as being equivalent to pure yellow.
The cones
that allow us to see color cannot identify the actual wavelengths that
hit them, but if they are stimulated by the right combination of wavelengths,
then it will appear the same to our eyes as a single pure color, or
a mixture of a pure color and white light. (Smith,
American Journal of Physics, July 2005