American Institute of Physics
SEARCH AIP
home contact us sitemap
Physics News Update
Number 853, January 11, 2008 by Phillip F. Schewe and Jason S. Bardi

Unprecedented Spectroscopy Using the Best Ever Ruler for Light

Physicists at NIST-Boulder have carried out a powerful new spectroscopic study of a sample of gas using optical frequency combs. The NIST work, which might well change the way spectroscopy is done, is remarkable in that it provides the full spectrum of the gas over a broad spectral region and with frequency accuracy that can reach 1 Hz (for spectral frequencies of the order of 2 x 10^14 Hz). The NIST spectroscopic feat is equivalent to simultaneously sending 155,000 individual single frequency lasers through the sample and measuring the resulting amplitude and phase shift on each individual laser. Moreover, the spectrum is measured rapidly, using a device with no moving mechanical parts.

The invention of the optical frequency comb method was a great step forward in laser science. John Hall (NIST) and Ted Haensch (Max Planck) the Nobel prize in 2005 for their pioneering work in this area. (For a tutorial on frequency combs, see http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/newsfromnist_frequency_combs.htm) In the comb process, a pulsed laser emits light not merely at a single frequency, but at a series of frequencies. A frequency spectrum of this composite laser output looks like a comb, with light occurring at regularly spaced frequencies, covering the infrared part of the light spectrum. In many ways the frequency comb is an ideal tool for spectroscopy. Its light covers enormous amounts of the optical spectrum and the frequency of each individual comb line can be known to 1-Hz precision. When you pass a frequency comb through a gas cell a given comb line will, like any laser beam, be absorbed when it is resonant with any of the many quantum energy levels of the gas.

The challenge with frequency combs is to figure out which of the more than one-hundred thousand comb lines experience absorption and which do not. To solve this problem NIST researchers take the comb used for spectroscopy and mix it with a second carefully crafted frequency-comb. This ensemble of light pulses results in a “beat-frequency” pulse which can be measured with conventional electronics. From this beat-frequency pulse the absorption and phase shift experienced by each individual comb line can be separately observed. This work represents by far the largest number of frequency comb teeth that have been individually observed.

The present NIST experiment interrogates the effect of the absorption from the gas on 155,000 comb lines, spanning a wavelength range of 125 nm. The NIST precision of 1 Hz for spectral lines is to be compared with tens of MHz precision characterizing other spectroscopic techniques. NIST researchers believe that this new work might change the way people perform spectroscopy. (Coddington{ian@nist.gov, 303-497-4889}, Swann, Newbury, Physical Review Letters, 11 January 2008; PRL editors designate this as a Suggested Article)

Acoustic Cloaking

Computer simulations and the use of wave scattering theory have demonstrated that, contrary to earlier predictions, it should be possible to produce a 3-dimensional material shell which is invisible to sound waves, analogous to “optical cloaking,” the process in which light waves are guided around an object and then refocused on the far side and in the same direction (with no reflected light to betray position) so as to make the object seem invisible. Full optical cloaking has not been achieved yet, but researchers expect to be able to do it.

Can the same thing be done with sound waves? In principle there is no reason why it couldn’t be done. The leader of a group of scientists examining this issue, Steven Cummer at Duke University, says that many of the principles that pertain to the channeling of light waves around an object also apply to sound waves. To be sure, there are differences. Sound waves oscillate in the direction of their motion while the electric and magnetic fields composing light waves oscillate perpendicularly to the wave motion. In the optical case, cloaking will require a material (actually a meta-material) tailored, highly anisotropic (varying widely according to the direction through the material) index of refraction.

In practice, the index of refraction for electromagnetic waves depends on the permittivity, a measure of the material's response to an applied electric field, and permeability, its response to an applied magnetic field (for an account of the demonstration of negative-index materials, see http://www.aip.org/pnu/2000/split/pnu476-1.htm). The acoustic equivalent of these two parameters are the mass density and the bulk modulus (the springiness) of the background fluid (usually air or water) in which the object sits. Cummer (919-660-5256, cummer@ee.duke.edu) says that in the short run acoustic cloaking might be more practical than optical cloaking.

A limitation of electromagnetic cloaking, he says, is that it requires portions of the wave to move faster than the speed of light (in full accordance with special relativity); this can be done for very limited frequency ranges but not for wider ranges, limiting the applicability of optical cloaking. This limitation does not apply to sound waves moving through matter. Furthermore, the acoustic properties of most materials means that sound waves might not be absorbed as readily in acoustic cloaking as light waves are absorbed in optical cloaking (in which case the cloaking would be something less than perfect).

Applications of acoustic cloaking come easily to mind: hiding submarines from sonar, for example. Another potential practical application might be in architecture, where acoustic considerations (reducing noise) might not have to be sacrificed in the interest of structural integrity. Among Cummer’s collaborators are David Smith of Duke (one of the early pioneers in the field of negative-index materials) and John Pendry of Imperial College (the early theorist of negative-index studies). (Cummer et al., Physical Review Letters, 18 January 2008; considered an editor’s Suggested article in PRL)

Back to Physics News Update