American Institute of Physics
SEARCH AIP
home contact us sitemap
Physics News Update
Number 874, October 7, 2008 by Phillip F. Schewe, James Dawson, and Jason S. Bardi

The 2008 Nobel Prize for Physics Goes To

Yoichiro Nambu of the University of Chicago (US), Makoto Kobayashi of the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (Japan), and Toshihide Maskawa of Kyoto University for their work on symmetry breaking. Nambu will receive half the prize for this work on the general mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking, while Kobayashi and Maskawa are being recognized for their theoretical work that ties symmetry breaking to the existence of three families of quarks.

Symmetry plays an important role in physics. The three new physics laureates studied how symmetries are preserved or violated in various ways.
What is symmetry? The geometrical symmetry of the two sides of the human face is an example of something being the same or equivalent. Rotate a sixfold-symmetric snowflake through one-sixth of a circle and it will look that same.

In physics, symmetry is a more general concept and applies to the idea that a physical situation will be the same even if a certain transformation occurs. Three of the most fundamental symmetries bear the name of time reversal invariance (symbolized by the letter T), charge conjugation invariance ( C), and parity invariance (P). Picture the microscopic interaction of several particles, as if they were billiard balls. Time invariance is the proposition that watching a movie of the interaction would look very like what we’d see if the movie were run in reverse. That is, the interaction is invariant, or the same, even if time is reversed.

Charge conjugation refers to the hypothetical replacement of all particles by their antimatter counterparts. Physicists once believed that doing this kind of transformation would leave intact the basic physics of the interaction. Parity invariance is the proposition that if we project all the interacting particles through a hypothetical three-dimensional mirror (replacing all their spatial coordinates (x, y, z) with opposite values (-x, -y, -z)) the physics would again appear the same.

The universe was, physicists once thought, invariant with respect to all three of these operations. But nature is complicated. Apparently most symmetries are made to be broken, and that’s where the theoretical work of the new Nambu, Kobayahsi, and Maskawa comes into play. How did these asymmetries become apparent? In the 1950s scientists discovered that parity was not invariant, at least with respect to the weak force. That is, the weak force brought about a particular nuclear decay in which parity was not conserved. In 1964 James Cronin and Val Fitch discovered that the decay of K mesons also violated the combined symmetry of C and P, or CP.

These experiments came as something of a surprise, and theorists had to struggle to explain why nature was less symmetric than was thought. The three present Nobel laureates all contributed key papers in this regard. They addressed the idea that CP violation could account for the fact that in our observable universe matter seems to predominate over anti-matter. The 1972 theory of Kobayashi and Maskawa helped to explain this asymmetry. Furthermore, another implication of their work was the predicted existence of new types of quarks (one of the categories of basic building blocks for matter) beyond those already known. These quarks were later discovered in experiments.

A longer version of this description will be available later today on the Inside Science News Service website, http://www.aip.org/isns/

Past Physics News Update Items relating to this award

Stories we have covered in past issue of our newsletter Physics News Update

Magazine Articles relating to the award

  • Physics Today, Feb 2003, matter-antimatter asymmetry
  • Physics Today, Nov 1988, experiments in the 1950s
  • Physics Today, Jan 1968, field theory and Nambu theory
  • Physics Today, Oct 1996, review of Nambu papers
  • Physics Today, Feb 1999, direct time non-invariance
  • Physics Today, May 1999, direct CP violation
  • Physics Today, May 2001, experiments at KEK and SLAC
  • Scientific Amer, Nov 1976, Nambu
  • Scientific Amer, Feb 1988, CP violation
  • Scientific Amer, Oct 1998, matter/antimatter asymmetry
  • Scientific Amer, Aug 2001, antimatter
  • Scientific Amer, Jun 1986, supersymmetry
  • Scientific Amer, Apr 1985, standard model

Websites

Back to Physics News Update