Technology
Scramjets integrate air and space
by Dean Andreadis pdf version of this article
 |
|
| The world's first scramjet engine to demonstrate
operability at Mach 4.5-6.5 using conventional fuel. |
|
As the 21st century unfolds, a revolutionary
engine technology is aiming to
fly craft at high Mach speeds and seamlessly
integrate air-to-space operations. The supersonic
combustion ramjet, or scramjet, uses
no rotating parts, will power vehicles hundreds
of miles in minutes, and will make
rapid global travel and affordable access to
space a reality.
These goals drew closer to achievement
this spring when the first scramjet-powered
aircraft flew on its own. On the afternoon of
March 27, an unpiloted X-43A, a National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) craft mounted on a Pegasus booster
rocket, dropped from a B-52 flying at 40,000 ft
off the coast of California. The rocket sent
the experimental aircraft soaring
to its test altitude of 95,000 ft,
where the X-43A separated from
its booster, and its scramjet
engine fired for a planned 10-s
test, achieving an incredible
Mach 7, or 5,000 mph.
Data from that flight helped validate the
concept of a hypersonic craft with an airbreathing
engine. More flights during the
next several years will expand on the engine
and aerodynamics data obtained in March,
and could put some scramjet vehicles in
service in less than a decade.
Scramjets will enable three categories of
hypersonic craft: weapons, such as cruise
missiles; aircraft, such as those designed for
global strike and reconnaissance missions;
and space-access vehicles
that will take off and land
like airliners.
Scramjets have a long
and active development
history in the United States.
On the basis of theoretical studies started in
the 1940s, the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and
NASA began developing scramjet engines in
the late 1950s. Since then, many hydrogenand
hydrocarbon-fueled engine programs
have helped scramjet technology evolve to
its current state. The most influential of
these efforts was NASA’s National Aerospace
Plane (NASP) program, established in 1986
to develop a vehicle with speed greater than
Mach 15 and horizontal takeoff and landing
capabilities. The program ended in 1993,
but the original NASP engine design, significantly
modified by NASA, provided the
foundation for the power plant used during
the X-43A’s recent flight.
Advanced Illustration, Ltd.
The U.S. Air Force and Pratt & Whitney
ground-tested the first uncooled hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet engine
at simulated
Mach 4.5–6.5 in 2001. This collaboration
also demonstrated in 2003 a scramjet
made from nickel-based alloys and cooled
by its JP7 jet fuel. The 2003 engine has the
potential to power future missiles, aircraft,
and access-to-space vehicles. Last year, the
Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency, U.S. Navy, Boeing, Aerojet, and
Johns Hopkins University also ground-tested
a scramjet engine, which was constructed
primarily from nickel alloys, powered by
JP10 jet fuel, and intended exclusively for
hypersonic missiles.
What is a scramjet?
In a conventional ramjet, the incoming
supersonic airflow is slowed to subsonic
speeds by multiple shock waves, created by
back-pressuring the engine. Fuel is added to
the subsonic airflow, the mixture combusts,
and exhaust gases accelerate through a narrow
throat, or mechanical choke, to supersonic
speeds. By contrast, the airflow in a
pure scramjet remains supersonic throughout
the combustion process and does not
require a choking mechanism, which provides
optimal performance over a wider
operating range of Mach numbers. Modern
scramjet engines can function as both a ramjet
and scramjet and seamlessly make the
transition between the two (Figure 2).
Propulsion efficiency is Isp•s, where effective
specific impulse (Isp) is determined by the
ratio of thrust to drag.
The scramjet provides the most integrated
engine–vehicle design for aircraft and
missiles. The engine occupies the entire
lower surface of the vehicle body (Figure
1a). The propulsion system consists of five
major engine and two vehicle components:
the internal inlet, isolator, combustor, internal
nozzle, and fuel supply subsystem, and
the craft’s forebody, essential for air induction,
and aftbody, which is a
critical part of the nozzle
component.
 |
| Figure 2. Propulsion efficiency
decreases with speed as we progress through turbojets to ramjets
and scramjets to rockets; hydrogen is more efficient than jet
fuel. |
The high-speed air-induction
system consists of the
vehicle forebody and internal
inlet, which capture and
compress air for processing
by the engine’s other components.
Unlike jet engines,
vehicles flying at high supersonic
or hypersonic speeds
can achieve adequate compression
without a mechanical
compressor. The forebody
provides the initial
compression, and the internal
inlet provides the final
compression. The air undergoes
a reduction in Mach
number and an increase in
pressure and temperature as
it passes through shock
waves at the forebody and
internal inlet (Figure 1b).
The isolator in a scramjet is a critical component.
It allows a supersonic flow to adjust
to a static back-pressure higher than the
inlet static pressure. When the combustion
process begins to separate the boundary
layer, a precombustion shock forms in the
isolator. The isolator also enables the combustor
to achieve the required heat release
and handle the induced rise in combustor
pressure without creating a condition called
inlet unstart, in which shock waves prevent
airflow from entering the isolator.
The combustor accepts the airflow and
provides efficient fuel–air mixing at several
points along its length, which optimizes
engine thrust. The expansion system, consisting
of the internal nozzle and vehicle aftbody,
controls the expansion of the highpressure,
high-temperature gas mixture to
produce net thrust. The expansion process
converts the potential energy generated by
the combustor to kinetic energy. The important
physical phenomena in the scramjet
nozzle include flow chemistry, boundarylayer
effects, nonuniform flow conditions,
shear-layer interaction, and three-dimensional
effects. The design of the nozzle has a
major effect on the efficiency of the engine
and the vehicle, because it influences the
craft’s pitch and lift.
Operations
 |
| Figure 3. As the vehicle
speed increases from Mach 3 to Mach 8, the isolator pressure
ratio passes through a peak at Mach 6. As the shock train and
boundary layer retreat, the modes change from dual-mode ramjet
to dual-mode scramjet to pure scramjet mode. |
An air-breathing hypersonic vehicle
requires several types of engine operations
to reach scramjet speeds. The vehicle may
utilize one of several propulsion systems to
accelerate from takeoff to Mach 3. Two
examples are a bank of gas-turbine engines
in the vehicle, or the use of rockets, either
internal or external to the engine.
At Mach 3–4, a scramjet transitions from
low-speed propulsion to a situation in which
the shock system has sufficient strength to
create a region(s) of subsonic flow at the
entrance to the combustor. In a conventional
ramjet, the inlet and diffuser decelerate the
air to low subsonic speeds by increasing
the diffuser area, which ensures complete
combustion at subsonic speeds. A converging–
diverging nozzle behind the combustor
creates a physical throat and generates the
desired engine thrust. The required choking
in a scramjet, however, is provided within
the combustor by means of a thermal throat,
which needs no physical narrowing of the
nozzle. This choke is created by the right
combination of area distribution, fuel–air
mixing, and heat release.
During the time a scramjet-powered vehicle
accelerates from Mach 3 to 8, the airbreathing
propulsion system undergoes a
transition between Mach 5 and 7. Here, a
mixture of ramjet and scramjet combustion
occurs. The total rise in temperature and
pressure across the combustor begins to
decrease. Consequently, a weaker precombustion
system is required, and the precombustion
shock is pulled back from the inlet
throat toward the entrance to the combustor.
As speeds increase beyond Mach 5, the
use of supersonic combustion can provide
higher performance (Figure 3). Engine efficiency
dictates using the ramjet until Mach
5–6. At around Mach 6, decelerating airflow
to subsonic speeds for combustion results
in parts of the airflow almost halting, which
creates high pressures and heat-transfer
rates. Somewhere between Mach 5 and 6,
the combination of these factors indicates a
switch to scramjet operation.
When the vehicle accelerates beyond
Mach 7, the combustion process can no
longer separate the airflow, and the engine
operates in scramjet mode without a precombustion
shock. The inlet shocks propagate
through the entire engine. Beyond Mach
8, physics dictates supersonic combustion
because the engine cannot survive the pressure
and heat buildup caused by slowing the
airflow to subsonic speeds.
| MACH NUMBERS: Dividing
an object’s speed by the speed of sound yields its Mach
number, a ratio named for 19th-century Austrian physicist Ernst
Mach, who laid out the principles of supersonic speed. Mach
1 equals the speed of sound (transonic), and a Mach number
lower than 1 is subsonic. Supersonic covers speeds greater
than Mach 1 up to Mach 5, and hypersonic is any speed greater
than Mach 5. |
Scramjet operation at Mach 5–15 presents
several technical problems to achieving
efficiency. These challenges include
fuel–air mixing, management
of engine heat loads,
increased heating on leading
edges, and developing
structures and materials
that can withstand
hypersonic flight.
When the velocity of
the injected fuel equals
that of the airstream entering
the scramjet combustor,
which occurs at
about Mach 12, mixing
the air and fuel becomes
difficult. And at higher
Mach numbers, the high
temperatures in the combustor
cause dissociation
and ionization. These
factors—coupled with already-complex flow
phenomena such as supersonic mixing, isolator–
combustor interactions, and flame
propagation—pose obstacles to flow-path
design, fuel injection, and thermal management
of the combustor.
Several sources contribute to engine heating
during hypersonic flight, including heating
of the vehicle skin from subsystems such
as pumps, hydraulics, and electronics, as
well as combustion. Thermal-management
schemes focus on the engine in hypersonic
vehicles because of its potential for extremely
high heat loads. The engine represents a particularly
challenging problem because the
flow path is characterized by very high thermal,
mechanical, and acoustic loading, as
well as a corrosive mix of hot oxygen and
combustion products. If the engine is left
uncooled, temperatures in the combustor
would exceed 5,000 °F, which is higher than
the melting point of most metals. Fortunately,
a combination of structural design, material
selection, and active cooling can manage
the high temperatures.
Hypersonic vehicles also pose an extraordinary
challenge for structures and materials.
The airframe and engine require lightweight,
high-temperature materials and
structural configurations that can withstand
the extreme environment of hypersonic
flight. These include:
- very high temperatures
- heating of the whole vehicle
- steady-state and transient localized heating from shock waves
- high aerodynamic loads
- high fluctuating pressure loads
- the potential for severe flutter, vibration, fluctuating and
thermally-induced pressures
- erosion from airflow over the vehicle and through the engine
With the completion of the successful
X-43A flight and the ground-testing of several
full-sized demonstration engines, confidence
in the viability of the hydrogen- and
hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet engines has
increased significantly. NASA plans to
launch another X-43A this fall and fly it at
Mach 10, or 6,750 mph.

Advanced Illustration, Ltd. |
ROCKETS AND JETS:
Both rockets and jet engines burn a
mixture of fuel and an oxidizer to create propulsive thrust.
Their fundamental difference is that rockets carry the
oxidizer onboard, whereas jets obtain it from the air.
Engines that use air are referred to as air-breathing engines.
In a turbojet, the air passes through a compressor, a burner,
and a turbine, where some of the flow energy is extracted
to drive the compressor. In a turbofan engine, there is
an additional shaft, and a fan in front that bypasses the
engine and sends some high-speed air directly to the exhaust.
In a supersonic ramjet, which has no moving parts, pressure
is boosted by reducing air moving through the engine to
subsonic levels before combustion. Scramjets are ramjets
that fly at hypersonic speeds and whose airflow through
the combustor is supersonic. To meet the demands of supersonic
flight, both engines eject small amounts of exhaust at
high velocity. A craft’s cooling and the systems
needed to meet its mission typically determine the choice
between hydrogen and hydrocarbon as its fuel. Missiles
and short-range aircraft may use hydrocarbon fuels for
their storability and volumetric energy density. Long-range
cruise aircraft and rockets tend toward hydrogen because
of its superior energy release per pound and heat absorption
capability.
|
The U.S. Air Force, Pratt & Whitney, and
Boeing’s Phantom Works will conduct flight
tests of a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet in
2007 or 2008. The tests—using an engine
that is relatively easy to manufacture—will
demonstrate significant acceleration, operate
the engine for several minutes at Mach
4.5–6.5, and use sensors and computers to
control the engine and flight.
Demonstrating these technologies, along
with additional ground- and flight-test
experiments, will pave the way for affordable
and reusable air-breathing hypersonic
engines for missiles, long-range aircraft, and
space-access vehicles around 2010, 2015,
and 2025, respectively.
Further reading
- Access to Space Study: Summary Report;
Office of Space Systems Development, NASA
Headquarters, Washington, DC, 1994.
- Curran, E. T.; Murthy, S. N. B.; Eds., Scramjet Propulsion;
Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 189; AIAA: Washington,
DC, 2000.
- Faulkner, R. F. The Evolution of the
HySET Hydrocarbon Fueled Scramjet
Engine; AIAA Paper 2003-7005; AIAA:
Washington, DC, 2003.
- Heiser, W. H.; Pratt, D. T. Hypersonic Airbreathing
Propulsion; AIAA: Washington,
DC, 1994.
- Kandebo, S. W. New Powerplant Key to
Missile Demonstrator. Aviation Week Space
Technol., Sept. 2, 2002; p. 56.
- McClinton, C. R.; Andrews, E. H.; Hunt,
J. L. Engine Development for Space Access:
Past, Present, and Future. Int. Symp. Air
Breathing Engines, Jan. 2001; ISABE Paper
2001-1074.
Dean Andreadis is
a specialist in flowpath aerothermal analysis and systems integration
at Pratt & Whitney Space Propulsion,
Hypersonics, in West Palm Beach, Florida
|