What’s Ahead
Perry to Testify Before House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee
On Thursday morning, Energy Secretary Rick Perry is testifying on the Department of Energy’s “missions and management priorities” before the Energy Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. It will be Perry’s first Capitol Hill appearance since June, when he testified before the House and Senate Appropriations subcommittees responsible for the DOE budget as well as the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Perry has yet to testify before the House Science Committee. That committee’s ranking member, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX), said during a hearing on electric grid resiliency last week that it is “unacceptable” that no DOE representative has yet appeared before the committee this year. She urged Committee Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) to schedule a hearing with Perry “as soon as possible.”
NIST Campus Security Under Science Committee Scrutiny
On Wednesday morning, the House Science Committee is holding a hearing to discuss results of the Government Accountability Office’s “undercover review” of the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s physical security practices. The hearing will focus on “prior NIST campus security breaches and vulnerabilities as they relate to the structure and organization of the physical security program at NIST.” Witnesses include Kent Rochford, who was acting director of NIST until last week when the agency’s new director, Walter Copan, was confirmed by the Senate; Lisa Casias, deputy assistant secretary for administration at the Department of Commerce; and Seto Bagdoyen, director of audit services at GAO. After several incidents, NIST recently conducted a “security prioritization sprint,” which developed 12 actions to address the top 25 security vulnerabilities that the review identified.
Trump Set to Kick Fate of Iran Nuclear Deal to Congress
Prior to an Oct. 15 deadline, President Trump is expected to “decertify” the deal the Obama administration negotiated with Iran that placed various restrictions on the country’s nuclear program in exchange for lifting certain sanctions. The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act requires that the president certify every 90 days that Iran is in compliance and that the agreement is vital to U.S. national security interests. It is anticipated that Trump will argue that the deal is not in the nation’s security interest, a notable break from the view of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, who expressed support for the deal to Congress on Oct. 2. Former Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz also argued that Trump should preserve the deal in a Oct. 4 op-ed , in part on the grounds that the technical basis of the deal is sound. Moniz wrote:
As a physicist involved with the US nuclear weapons program for decades, I know what it takes to build a nuclear bomb. As the principal negotiator of the final Iran deal nuclear provisions, I know that its 159 pages of unprecedented detailed requirements are a significant barrier to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon.
AAAS Hosting S&T Policy Fellowship Storytelling Event
On Wednesday evening, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in partnership with The Story Collider, is hosting a science policy storytelling and networking event in honor of the 45th anniversary of the AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellowships program. Five current and former fellows will be sharing personal stories about science, including current American Meteorological Society congressional fellow Caroline Normile. There will also be a resource fair where individuals can interact with representatives from AAAS programs, scientific societies, and science policy organizations throughout the evening.
In Case You Missed It
LIGO’s Nobel Prize Spotlights Science Policy and Management
When the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) announced its first detection of the merger of two black holes in 2016, the feat was quickly and widely hailed as a victory for the long-term funding of risky projects in fundamental science. Last week’s Nobel Prize in Physics brought further plaudits to the project, which is expected to continue producing novel results in the years ahead. MIT physicist Rainer Weiss, one of the prize’s recipients, said the honor should be seen as a symbol of the many other people who had worked on LIGO. He also said , “The prize and others that are given to scientists is an affirmation by our society of [the importance of] gaining information about the world around us from reasoned understanding of evidence.”
The National Science Foundation has been funding LIGO since the 1970s and scaled up support in the 1990s. As the project began to absorb more resources, critics in the scientific community complained it siphoned them from other endeavors. Meanwhile, Congress considered pulling the plug. Caltech physicist Barry Barish received part of the prize for his stewardship of LIGO during this critical period. The prize’s third winner, Caltech physicist Kip Thorne, was one of the original drivers of the project, alongside Weiss and Ronald Drever, who died last year. Crediting Barish’s later contribution, Thorne said , “Barish, in my opinion, is the most brilliant leader of large science projects that physics has ever seen.”
Senate Confirms NIST, NOAA, and DOE Nominees
On Oct. 5, the Senate confirmed by voice vote the nominations of Walter Copan to be director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Timothy Gallaudet to be deputy administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Bruce Walker to be head of the Department of Energy’s Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. Each had a rapid journey to confirmation, advancing through the process within a month of their nominations. In contrast, the Senate has yet to act on various other pending DOE nominations, such as those of Paul Dabbar and Mark Menezes to roles that could split in two the responsibilities of the current position of under secretary for science and energy.
Pence Calls for NASA to Return to the Moon
At the inaugural meeting of the reconstituted National Space Council, Vice President Pence outlined the Trump administration’s space policy priorities in his opening speech , calling for NASA to shift its focus to returning humans to the Moon. This marks a significant shift from the Obama administration’s space policy, which focused on developing capabilities for sending humans to Mars. Pence tasked NASA with creating a plan within 45 days for a “program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system, returning humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” Scientific exploration was not a focus of the event, which primarily consisted of discussion of civil, commercial, and national security space policy with panels of industry executives and security experts. However, there were several passing references to science by members of the council. Pence twice invoked a line in President Trump’s inaugural address about “unlock[ing] the mysteries of space” and said that the administration’s new direction for space policy will help inspire students to study STEM subjects.
Hearing Probes State of Plutonium-238 Production for NASA
On Oct. 4, the Space Subcommittee of the House Science Committee convened a hearing to investigate the state of U.S. production of plutonium-238, a radioisotope that serves as a source of heat and power on some of NASA’s robotic science missions. Domestic production of Pu-238 resumed in 2015 after a 27-year hiatus. The critical questions at hand are whether the planned production ramp up will be sufficient to meet NASA’s needs, whether inventories of Pu-238 are a limiting factor in NASA’s mission planning, and whether the radioisotope power systems currently in use are adequate or alternative designs should be developed. One of the witnesses was Shelby Oakley, an official at the Government Accountability Office, who spoke about a new GAO report on Pu-238 production, which recommends improvements in the Department of Energy’s management of the ramp up.
Interior Department Climate Policy Whistleblower Resigns
Joel Clement, a climate science and policy expert at the Department of Interior, resigned last week after arguing that Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke has displayed poor leadership, failed to address climate change, and wasted tax dollars by involuntarily reassigning him to a role unrelated to his background. Clement attracted national media attention in July when he filed a public whistleblower complaint against DOI, claiming he had been reassigned to a new position in retaliation for “speaking out publicly about the dangers that climate change poses to Alaska Native communities.” As the former director of DOI’s Office of Policy Analysis, Clement raised the issue of climate change impacts on Alaskan communities with administration leadership and the international community during the months before his reassignment.
Events This Week
Monday, October 9 National Academy of Engineering: Annual meeting
9:30 am - 5:00 pm, National Academies (2101 Constitution Ave. NW, DC)
Webcast available
Tuesday, October 10 Georgia Tech: Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy
(continues Wednesday)
Georgia Tech Global Learning Center (Atlanta, GA)
NASA: Lunar Exploration Analysis Group annual meeting
(continues through Thursday)
Universities Space Research Association headquarters (Columbia, MD)
Webcast available
National Academies: Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, 34th meeting
(continues Wednesday)
Keck Center (500 5th St. NW, DC)
USGS: Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee meeting
(continues Wednesday)
Golden Hotel (Golden, CO)
Wednesday, October 11 House: “NIST’s Physical Security Vulnerabilities: A GAO Undercover Review”
10:00 am, Science Committee (2318 Rayburn Office Building)
International Panel on Fissile Materials: Launch of report on highly enriched uranium use as fuel in Russia
10:00 - 11:15 am, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (1400 K St. NW, DC)
FASEB: “Value of Federally Funded Biological Research” webinar
2:00 - 3:00 pm
AAAS/COMPASS: “Engaging ‘The Public’ with Science and Engineering: Communication, Conversation, and Dialogue” webinar
3:30 - 4:15 pm
AAAS/Story Collider: “45th Anniversary S&T Policy Fellowship Story Collider and Resource Fair”
6:00 - 9:00 pm, AAAS headquarters (1200 New York Ave. NW, DC)
Thursday, October 12 National Academies: “Aero 2050: A Webcast on the Future of Civil Aeronautics”
8:30 am - 5:00 pm, National Academies (2101 Constitution Ave. NW, DC)
National Academies: Committee on Radio Frequencies meeting
(continues Friday)
University of Colorado-Boulder (Boulder, CO)
House: “Department of Energy Missions and Management Priorities”
10:00 am, Energy and Commerce Committee (2123 Rayburn Office Building)
NSF: Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering Advisory Committee meeting
10:00 am - 4:00 pm, NSF headquarters (Alexandria, VA)
Stony Brook University: Carl Zimmer on “Science Reporting in the Age of Fake News”
4:00 pm, Stony Brook University (Stony Brook, NY)
Webcast Available
Friday, October 13 DOE: Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee meeting
9:00 am - 4:30 pm, Westin Crystal City (Arlington, VA)
Arizona State University/Think Write Publish: “Science & Religion–Exploring the Harmonies”
4:00 - 6:00 pm, Keck Center (500 5th St. NW, DC)
Monday, October 16 USGS: National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council meeting
(continues Tuesday)
Graduate Berkeley (Berkeley, CA)
Opportunities
AAAS S&T Policy Fellowship Deadline Approaching
The deadline to apply for the 2018-2019 American Association for the Advancement of Science S&T Policy Fellowship program is Nov. 1. Applicants must have a Ph.D. or equivalent-level degree or a M.S. in engineering with three years of professional engineering experience in order to qualify.
National Academies Hiring for Multiple Policy Positions
The National Academies is currently accepting applications for senior program officer positions on the Energy and Environmental Systems (BEES) and Chemical Sciences and Technology (BCST) Boards. BEES is specifically seeking individuals with expertise in physics or chemistry for a part-time position, while BCST is seeking individuals with expertise in chemistry or chemical engineering and are able to obtain a security clearance. Interested applicants with a Ph.D. in their respective fields and six years of experience are encouraged to apply.
Center for Investigative Reporting Seeking Science Reporter
The Center for Investigative Reporting is currently accepting applications for an investigative journalist position on the “(Un)Scientific Method” project, which covers the intersections of science and government in the Trump administration. Individuals with extensive federal agency contacts and audio skills are encouraged to apply by Oct. 20.
Know of an upcoming science policy opportunity? Email us at fyi@aip.org.Know of an upcoming science policy event? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
White House
- Why we need to start teaching tech in kindergarten (New York Post, perspective by Ivanka Trump)
Congress
- Rep. Bill Foster proposes formula change for program that funds research in underserved states (ScienceInsider)
- Science Committee investigates Virginia Tech professor’s defrauding of NSF, DOE, and Virginia Tech (House)
Budget
- House and Senate advance budget plans, but not much changes for science (AAAS)
- The federal budget part two: A tutorial and update on the FY18 physical science R&D budget (APS News, perspective by Cherry Murray)
Nobel Prizes
- Nobel Prize winners worry about the state of science funding (Boston Globe)
- A 2017 Nobel laureate says he left science because he ran out of money and was fed up with academia (Quartz)
- LIGO’s unsung heroes (Nature)
- Learning from gravitational waves (New York Times, perspective by David Kaiser)
- The absurdity of the Nobel Prizes in science (The Atlantic, perspective by Ed Yong)
- How fair is it for just three people to receive the Nobel Prize in physics? (The Conversation, perspective by Caroline Wagner)
- Nobel Prizes should reward science, not scientists (Slate, perspective by Devang Mehta)
Science, Society, and the Economy
- NIST adds nearly $2 billion in combined economic contributions to Maryland and Colorado (University of Colorado)
- Jim Gates theorizes on equality, skepticism in science (Brown Daily Herald)
- Can Hollywood movies about climate change make a difference? (New York Times)
- Promoting human rights through science (Science, perspective)
- What’s a science reporter to do when sound evidence isn’t sound? (New York Times, perspective by Carl Zimmer)
- First they came for the biologists (Wall Street Journal, perspective by Heather Heying)
- The world needs a terrestrial Sputnik moment (The Atlantic, perspective by Lawrence Krauss)
Education and Workforce
- Why 4-H is focusing on STEM (Axios)
- Disturbing allegations of sexual harassment in Antarctica leveled at noted scientist (ScienceInsider)
- Undergraduate research surges, despite uncertainties over best practices (Chronicle of Higher Education)
- Here’s the leaked anti-leak training email sent to DOE staff (Wired)
- Santa Fe school board opposes state science education standards (The Scientist)
- Filling the pipeline for computer science teachers (ScienceInsider)
- Ten simple rules in considering a career in academia versus government (PLOS, perspective by Philip Bourne)
- Science without walls is good for all (Nature, editorial)
- Open countries have strong science (Nature, perspective by Caroline Wagner and Koen Jonkers)
- Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move (Nature, perspective by Cassidy Sugimoto, et al.)
Research Management
- Publishers taking legal action against ResearchGate to limit unlicensed paper sharing on networking site (Chemical & Engineering News)
- New metric takes a crack at solving science’s credibility problem (Physics Today)
- Societies reconsider conference plans (Nature)
- A call to create a federal Department of Science (John Hopkins News-Letter, perspective by Jonathan Patterson)
- A look forward on patent reform (Medium, perspective by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT))
- Support science by publishing in scientific society journals (Scholarly Kitchen, perspective by Phil Davis)
Labs and Facilities
- Request for information on mid-scale research infrastructure (NSF)
- Jefferson Lab completes 12 GeV upgrade (DOE)
- ICARUS neutrino detector arrives at Fermilab (APS News)
- Seismic array shifts to Alaska (Science)
Energy
- Electric grid resiliency — the update America needs (Houston Chronicle, perspective by Reps. Lamar Smith (R-TX), Randy Weber (R-TX), and Brian Babin (R-TX))
- How fracking is upending the chemical industry (Nature)
- Updated solid-state lighting R&D plan published (DOE)
- Exascale computing to help accelerate drive for clean fusion energy (HPCwire)
Space
- National Space Council calls for human return to the moon (SpaceNews)
- Are we really going to the Moon? History isn’t kind to presidential plans (Ars Technica, perspective by Eric Berger)
- NASA’s future missions to Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and beyond may hit a nuclear roadblock within the next decade (Business Insider)
- 30+ Florida scientists urge Senate to oppose Donald Trump’s NASA pick (Florida Politics)
- Would Jim Bridenstine be a down to Earth NASA administrator? (Union of Concerned Scientists)
- ISS partners seek clarity on station’s long-term future (SpaceNews)
- Escalation and deterrence in the Second Space Age (CSIS, report)
Weather, Climate, and Environment
- Trump takes a first step toward scrapping Obama’s global warming policy (New York Times)
- Researchers debate whether global injection of aerosols can control global warming (APS News)
- Rise of distorted news puts climate scientists on their guard (Eos)
- EPA pick’s books hint at faith-based view of science (E&E News)
- US numerical weather is still behind and not catching up: What is wrong and how can it be fixed? (Cliff Mass Weather and Climate Blog)
Defense
- Energy innovation critical to national security, too (The Hill, perspective by Gen. James L. Jones and Trent Lott)
- Campaign to ban nuclear weapons wins Nobel Peace Prize (Physics Today)
- Lawmakers promise Pentagon a ‘lot of support’ for ballistic missile defense (SpaceNews)
- Get lasers into the field faster, lawmakers tell the Pentagon (DefenseOne)
- Nuclear monitoring and verification in the digital age (Federation of American Scientists, report)
- North Korea’s nuclear behavior and US diplomacy (Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, interview with Siegfried Hecker)
- North Korea is testing not just bombs, but the entire global nuclear monitoring system (DefenseOne, perspective by Trevor Findlay)
Biomedical
- Updated: Why would a university pay a scientist found guilty of misconduct to leave? (ScienceInsider)
- NIH advisory council considers ways to enhance efficiency of peer review (FASEB)
- IBM to Congress: Watson will transform health care, so keep your hands off our supercomputer (STAT)
- Clinical research: Inequality in medicine (Nature, perspective by Anna Nowogrodzki)
International Affairs
- G7 plans joint research funding (*Research)
- US-Iran science exchange (Science, perspective by Glenn Schweitzer)
- A ‘sonic attack’ on diplomats in Cuba? These scientists doubt it (New York Times)
- PM May announces ‘major review’ of English university funding (Times Higher Education)
- Europe’s Joint Research Centre, although improving, must think bigger (Nature, editorial)
- Catalan independence vote fallout sees research centers’ bank accounts frozen (Chemistry World)
- 60 years after Sputnik, Russian space program faces troubles (AP)
- United Arab Emirates to establish human spaceflight program (SpaceNews)
- Scientists plead with Brazilian government to restore funding (Nature)