You are here
Usage information and disclaimer
This transcript may not be quoted, reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part by any means except with the written permission of the American Institute of Physics.
This transcript is based on a tape-recorded interview deposited at the Center for History of Physics of the American Institute of Physics. The AIP's interviews have generally been transcribed from tape, edited by the interviewer for clarity, and then further edited by the interviewee. If this interview is important to you, you should consult earlier versions of the transcript or listen to the original tape. For many interviews, the AIP retains substantial files with further information about the interviewee and the interview itself. Please contact us for information about accessing these materials.
Please bear in mind that: 1) This material is a transcript of the spoken word rather than a literary product; 2) An interview must be read with the awareness that different people's memories about an event will often differ, and that memories can change with time for many reasons including subsequent experiences, interactions with others, and one's feelings about an event. Disclaimer: This transcript was scanned from a typescript, introducing occasional spelling errors. The original typescript is available.
In footnotes or endnotes please cite AIP interviews like this:
Interview of William Baum by John Lutnes on 1969 January 14,
Niels Bohr Library & Archives, American Institute of Physics,
College Park, MD USA,
For multiple citations, "AIP" is the preferred abbreviation for the location.
Discussion of the Planetary Patrol Program ground observation collaboration involving several observatories (Lowell, Lick, and others). Comments on long-time viewing of Mars, its polar cap boundaries; the Martian "clouds." Jupiter observations in the future.
Well, let me try to explain what the planetary patrol program is all about. It’s a cooperative program involving several observatories for obtaining ground-based photographs of the planet. You see, there are a lot of things that you can do from the ground, from the earth, from existing observatories that it has not been possible to do from a flyby passing by the planet and observing it only for a very short time. From the earth you can maintain observations over a sustained period of time, a long period of time. From the earth you can also, making use of several observatories, see the different sides of the planet. Any one observatory keeps seeing the same side of Mars, in the case of Mars, because Mars has a rotation period that’s almost equal to that of the earth. In order to see different sides of the planet, it’s necessary to have observatories on different sides of the earth, so that as one observatory loses it, the next observatory picks it up. And in the course of a 24-hour period, the observations are more or less continuous, and they cover approximately one rotation of Mars at the same time.
The ground-based observations made over a period of weeks, months and even years enable one to follow what’s happening on the planet. Mars is a dynamic object. It changes. It’s not like the moon. It’s not some static thing that simply looks the same all the time. There are clouds that form, possibly frost patches. There are polar caps that wax and wane annually. There are seasonal darkenings. There are changes in the surface features, changes in their shape and in their coloration. These things can be followed only by observing the planet over long periods of time.
We have here at Lowell Observatory a collection of plates and films extending over a period of some 60 years.
Here at Lowell Observatory we have a collection of plates and films covering the past 60 years or more. A large percentage of these were observations made right here at Lowell. Many have been gathered from other places, notably from Lick Observatory, which has the second largest such collection, and from a number of other places more recently, like New Mexico State University and Cable Mountain Observatory and the Peak Observatory in France and several other places.
This collection of material enables us to see what’s happened over a period of time, and the changes I was describing are the type of things that can be observed and about which data can be taken in some kind of systematic manner.
Now, suppose that you want to follow the polar caps from Mars. You can take images taken over a period of weeks and months and years and examine them in a projection device that enables the images to be put into super-position with a coordinate grid. And you can read the boundary of the polar cap at a number of different meridians on the planet, and you can do this over and over again -- hundreds of images, thousands of images -- And use computer methods to summarize the material. In the end what you come up with is a study of the behavior of the polar cap boundary: do the same thing each Martian year, what does it do along one meridian compared with another. And you find some very interesting things. You find in this particular case that the polar caps of Mars are very unlike the snow cover on the earth. The polar caps of Mars are very repeatable. They do the same thing every year. If you name a date, you can say exactly where the polar cap will be quite exactly within a degree or so on the planet, which you could not do with the earth. You can also see differences from one meridian to another, indicating that there are differences in terrain, possibly differences in elevation; perhaps they are differences in the thermal conductivity or the reflectivity of surface rock. At any rate, the polar cap melts in a sort of bumpy and irregular way and yet a repeatable way, an amazingly repeatable way. This is true especially of the south polar cap of Mars.
You can also make studies of the clouds on Mars, which I have referred to earlier. Suppose that you see some of these bright, transient patches that show up on the image, and suppose you follow what happens to them. Some of these are fairly long-lived. They produce for not just days but maybe weeks. And some of them seem to sit in the same place. Some of them seem to be stationary, and you might wonder whether you should call them clouds or whether you should call them frost patches or what they are. Others do seem to move. They could still be creeping frost patches. We don’t really know that they’re suspended clouds, but they move and we’ve used the word “clouds.”
Earlier studies of these clouds had given people the idea that wind velocities on Mars were very high. We don’t find that. When we study these objects more carefully and we take the total body of material availa1le to us from the past six or seven decades and examine the whole of it, we find that the clouds on Mars move very slowly indeed. The fastest velocity we have found is nine miles an hour, and the average velocity is only three or four miles an hour.
Now, the planetary patrol gives us the opportunity of investigating this type of problem very much more thoroughly than we’ve been able to until now. It enables us to get a continuity that the earlier material didn’t provide, simply because the observations from several observatories spread around the earth enable us to follow these things to a degree that the rather scattered observations taken here and there, occasionally hit and miss, at one or two observatories -- that those did not earlier provide. We hope then that the planetary control can provide a lot in that regard.
The patrol is also providing observations of Jupiter. Jupiter is probably an object that will become increasingly of interest as time goes along. Right now the attention is focused on the moon and on Mars. That is, there have been the Apollo shots to the moon and the Mariner shots to Mars, and there are some future plans for both. Not very much has been heard yet about Jupiter, but Jupiter and the outer planets probably are still more interesting objects than these rather nearer neighbors that technology has enabled us to look at so far. So the patrol is looking ahead a little bit more perhaps when we concentrate part of the effort on Jupiter.
Jupiter is a very different kind of object. It’s enshrouded very much more in clouds. We don’t see a solid surface. The cloud patterns show a lot more change, a lot more detailed variation than anything we see on Mars. The type of study, the types of studies that should be made on Jupiter are only now beginning to crystallize.