What’s Ahead
Funding for Many Science Agencies Set to Expire Friday
The stopgap spending measure currently funding many federal agencies expires on Friday. To avoid a partial government shutdown, Congress must agree either to extend the measure or, less likely, finalize appropriations for agencies that were not yet funded at the beginning of fiscal year 2019 on Oct. 1. These agencies include NASA, the National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Environmental Protection Agency, and U.S. Geological Survey. An extension of stopgap funding could be short-term, buying time for a final agreement, or it could leave the matter to the new Congress, which begins Jan. 3. Trump has repeated earlier threats to demand funding for a border wall as a precondition for signing spending legislation. However, he has since said he is open to a short stopgap in light of the death of former President George H. W. Bush. A shutdown will ensue if a spending agreement is not reached or if Congress cannot muster support to override any presidential veto. If a shutdown does occur, the Department of Energy, Department of Defense, and National Institutes of Health would not be directly affected because their funding for the fiscal year has already been enacted.
UPDATE: Congress has reached a deal to extend stopgap funding until Dec. 21.
White House to Release STEM Education Strategic Plan
On Tuesday, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is releasing a congressionally mandated five-year interagency strategic plan for federal STEM education programs. The report will update the first five-year strategic plan, which was released in 2013. Deputy U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios said last week that, whereas the previous plan focused on increasing the number of students pursuing traditional post-secondary STEM degrees, the new report will emphasize “the need to ensure that all Americans have a strong STEM foundation, even those who are not pursuing a STEM degree as we know it now.” Agency officials scheduled to attend a White House release event include the National Science Foundation director, NASA administrator, acting head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, chief scientist of the Department of Agriculture, and the director of defense research and engineering for research and technology.
Senate Panel to Examine ‘Non-Traditional’ Espionage by China
The Senate Judiciary Committee is holding a full committee hearing on Wednesday titled “China’s Non-Traditional Espionage Against the United States: The Threat and Potential Policy Responses.” It comes in the wake of a report by Reuters last week that the Trump administration may implement new visa screening measures for Chinese students due to espionage concerns. The administration has asserted the Chinese government uses Chinese nationals in the U.S. as “non-traditional information collectors” as part of its efforts to acquire technology and technical knowledge through both legal and illegal means. China’s ambassador to the U.S. told Reuters that accusations about Chinese students being spies are groundless, and Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus Chair Judy Chu (D-CA) said she is “extremely concerned about the stereotyping and scapegoating of Chinese students and professors.”
UPDATE: This event has been postponed.
DOE Fusion Program Starting New Strategic Planning Effort
The Department of Energy’s Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) Advisory Committee is dedicating much of its meeting this Thursday and Friday to discussing a new long-range strategic planning activity. DOE will charge the committee with developing a strategic plan for the entire FES portfolio under multiple budget scenarios. In announcing the effort last month, FES acknowledged that two recent similar planning exercises failed to garner broad research community support. The new effort will be modeled on the high energy physics community’s “P5” process and the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee’s 2015 long-range plan . FES believes now is an opportune time to develop a comprehensive long-range plan in part because significant funding increases appropriated by Congress over the past two years have bolstered the program. Other items on this week’s meeting agenda include discussion of the plasma science decadal survey launched by the National Academies in October and a roundtable on quantum information science held by FES in May.
Quantum Computing Feasibility Report Set for Release
The National Academies is issuing a report this week on the technical feasibility of creating a “practical” quantum computer and the security implications of such a device. Study committee chair Mark Horowitz, an electrical engineering professor at Stanford University, and committee members John Martinis and Bob Blakely will answer questions about the report during a public webinar on Tuesday. According to the statement of task , the report estimates development timescales for quantum computing and quantum-resistant encryption and assesses the associated “costs and benefits from a national security perspective.” The Office of the Director of National Intelligence sponsored the study.
Senate Spending Panel to Spotlight Advanced Reactors
On Wednesday, the Senate Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee will hold a hearing that will examine the Department of Energy’s role in supporting the development of advanced nuclear reactors. Senators will hear from Edward McGinnis, the top official in the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy; Thomas Zacharia, director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory; and Christina Back, vice president for nuclear technologies and materials at General Atomics. The hearing continues a series the subcommittee has held to discuss the future of the U.S. nuclear energy industry, which has struggled in recent decades.
UPDATE: This event has been postponed.
In Case You Missed It
NASA Reveals Commercial Lunar Lander Partners
At a media event on Nov. 29, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine and Science Mission Directorate head Thomas Zurbuchen announced nine U.S.-based companies eligible for contracts to convey scientific instrumentation and technology demonstration payloads to the surface of the Moon. They range from established space players such as Lockheed Martin and Draper to new entrepreneurial ventures. NASA has said it will issue contracts totaling a maximum of $2.6 billion over 10 years for the program and could launch the program’s first mission as early as next year. Not all the companies will necessarily receive contracts. Bridenstine said he hopes competition among them will spur innovation in finding economical ways to deliver payloads and that NASA will be only one of their customers. He also emphasized the missions are intended to reestablish the Moon as a place for research, but that, consistent with the program’s entrepreneurial aims, he does not expect every mission to succeed.
Astro2020 Decadal Survey Leadership Announced
The National Academies announced on Nov. 28 that astronomers Fiona Harrison and Robert Kennicutt will co-chair the next decadal survey for astronomy and astrophysics. The survey, due for release in late 2020, will convey the research priorities of the astrophysical sciences community to NASA, the National Science Foundation, and Department of Energy to guide their planning. Harrison is a professor of physics and astronomy at Caltech and chair of its Division of Physics and Mathematics. She also chairs the National Academies Space Studies Board and is principal investigator of NASA’s Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) mission. Kennicutt currently holds appointments at the University of Arizona Steward Observatory and Texas A&M University. Until his retirement last year, he had been Plumian Professor of Astronomy and Experimental Philosophy at Cambridge University, where he also directed its Institute of Astronomy. Harrison and Kennicutt will assume responsibility over ongoing preparations for the survey, which include recruiting survey committee members, deciding on the survey’s panel structure, and gathering an initial round of community input via white papers.
Administration Claims Climate Report Relied on ‘Worst-Case Scenario’
Various Trump administration officials have adopted similar talking points on the Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), claiming the report based its conclusions on a “worst-case scenario” for future greenhouse gas levels. Extending previous White House statements, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler suggested in a Nov. 28 interview with the Washington Post that the Obama administration may have interfered with the report’s production by directing the study’s authors to use such a scenario. The EPA quickly issued a “fact check” reinforcing Wheeler’s statement, citing a 2015 memo stipulating the use of “a low-end and a high-end scenario.” The Obama White House official tasked with overseeing the initiation of NCA4, John Holdren, has denied political interference, calling Wheeler’s insinuation “absolutely false.”
Lucas Picked to Lead Science Committee Republicans
House Republicans have selected Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK) to be ranking member of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee in the upcoming Congress, replacing retiring Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) as the committee’s top Republican. In a statement , Lucas said he looks forward to “holding the new majority accountable and promoting a conservative agenda.” Last month, Lucas called the Science Committee a “fun committee with so much potential in a body that’s become more difficult to work in.” He also said weather observation and forecasting would be an ongoing priority for him. Lucas sponsored the bipartisan Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 . This past May, he sponsored a bipartisan bill supporting the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy, defying the Trump administration’s proposal to shut it down. However, he has also backed divisive efforts, including taking a leading role in advancing legislation to change how the EPA integrates science into its rulemaking and selects members of its Science Advisory Board.
National Quantum Initiative Bill Gaining Steam in Senate
Prospects for passage of legislation this year to create a National Quantum Initiative increased with the introduction of a Senate bill last week covering the Department of Energy component of the initiative. The bill would direct the DOE Office of Science to create between two and five quantum information science research centers and recommends a budget of up to $25 million annually for each over five years. The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee also posted a report last week to accompany the National Quantum Initiative bill it approved this summer. That bill contains provisions specific to the National Science Foundation and National Institute of Standards and Technology. It is anticipated the Senate will fuse the two committees’ bills and attempt to reconcile them with the House version.
NSF Previews Potential Physics Infrastructure Priorities
Anne Kinney, the head of the National Science Foundation’s Math and Physical Sciences Directorate, briefly previewed the directorate’s potential priorities for new major research infrastructure at a meeting of the National Science Board last week. In an overview presentation on the directorate’s portfolio, Kinney identified six projects that are “pending community prioritization”: the U.S. Extremely Large Telescope Program, Cosmic Microwave Background Stage 4 experiment, Next Generation Very Large Array, a 60 Tesla superconducting magnet, an upgrade to the IceCube neutrino observatory, and a further upgrade to the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory called SuperLIGO. For the nearer term, she noted the high luminosity upgrades for detectors at the Large Hadron Collider have almost completed their design review. This summer, the board authorized NSF to request funding for the LHC upgrades in a future budget request.
Review Recommends NIST Consider New Research Reactor
The National Academies released an assessment last week of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Neutron Research (NCNR). The review committee notes NIST’s current research reactor is a half-century old and that “as a matter of simple prudence, a plan needs to be developed that will ensure that NCNR users have the neutrons they need into the indefinite future.” Between continuing to operate the existing reactor, upgrading it, and replacing it, the committee deems the first two options as “inferior” to the third. Accordingly, it recommends NCNR commission a “detailed assessment” of the current facility and begin designing a new one. The assessment states that last year an internal NCNR study estimated such a facility would cost about $1 billion and take 15 years to complete. In October, NIST Director Walter Copan told the agency’s principal advisory committee that the Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and National Academies are interested in working with NIST to conduct a “national study” of a potential new federally supported reactor-based neutron scattering facility.
Earthquake Hazards Bill Moves to President’s Desk
The House passed the “National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Reauthorization Act” by voice vote on Nov. 27, sending the bipartisan bill to the president’s desk the same week a magnitude 7.0 earthquake struck Alaska. The Senate passed the bill in September by unanimous consent after adopting the text of a companion bill sponsored by outgoing Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) recommending $25 million more in funding over five years than the original Senate version. Sponsored by Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), the bill provides the first reauthorization for NEHRP in 15 years and prescribes improvements in earthquake preparedness and the development of a five-year management plan for the Advanced National Seismic System.
Air Force Advisory Board Completes S&T Strategy Review
The Air Force Scientific Advisory Board has completed a classified study that identifies key technologies for investment to “provide technologically superior warfighting capabilities.” A publicly available abstract of the report, titled “Maintaining Technology Superiority for the U.S. Air Force,” has been released. To advance these technologies, which are not publicly identified, the board calls on the Air Force to “substantially refocus” its science and technology budget. Meanwhile, the Air Force has been developing a separate long-term S&T strategy , which has been delayed .
Energy Innovation CEO Group Advocates for ARPA–E Model
The American Energy Innovation Council, an advocacy group led by 11 prominent U.S. business leaders, released a report on Nov. 28 offering a new “roadmap” for federal funding for clean energy R&D. The report analyzes U.S. and worldwide energy R&D trends and recommends the federal government invest $16 billion per year in “advanced energy innovation.” It also recommends the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy receive a minimum budget of $400 million in fiscal year 2020, and that in general it should be funded at $1 billion per year. The agency’s current budget is $366 million. The report also recommends DOE “work smarter — along the ARPA–E model where appropriate,” and establish regionally centered innovation programs and a program for “high-impact pilot projects.”
George H. W. Bush Administration Saw Major Turns in Science Policy
Former President George H. W. Bush died on Nov. 30 at the age of 94. Under his presidency, U.S. science policy shifted in new directions, in many cases with lasting influence. Directed by science advisor Allan Bromley, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy reversed a decline in staffing and resources. The White House Science Council, which reported to the OSTP director, was transformed into the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, reporting directly to the president. At the Cold War’s conclusion, the Bush administration funded military R&D at record-high levels, though it scaled back and reconfigured the Strategic Defense Initiative, President Reagan’s controversial ballistic missile defense program. Bush also oversaw significant investment in Earth science, signing legislation that established the U.S. Global Change Research Program, and initiating NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth program. Bush also appointed NASA Administrator Dan Goldin, who profoundly shaped the agency’s science mission planning through his “faster, better, cheaper” philosophy. Bush supported the ill-fated Superconducting Super Collider and he signed the High Performance Computing Act, establishing a national computing initiative that became a model for similar interagency R&D efforts to follow.
Events This Week
Monday, December 3 SSTI: “Navigating the New Innovation Landscape”
(continues through Wednesday)
Salt Lake City, Utah
IISS: “Next Generation Space Policy: Balancing Commerce, Scientific and Security Interests”
2:00 - 3:00 pm, International Institute for Strategic Studies (2121 K St. NW, DC)
ITIF: “Advancing the Next Wave of Aviation Innovation”
3:00 - 4:30 pm, ITIF headquarters (1101 K St. NW, DC)
Webcast available
Carnegie Endowment: “Japanese and American Innovation in a Global Age”
3:00 - 7:00 pm, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW, DC)
Tuesday, December 4 CSIS: Project on Nuclear Issues Winter Conference
8:00 am - 5:00 pm, CSIS headquarters (1616 Rhode Island Ave. NW, DC)
Wilson Center: “The Arctic and U.S. National Security”
8:30 am - 5:00 pm, Woodrow Wilson Center (1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, DC)
Invitation only, webcast available
MSRI/AMS: “From the Color of Birds to Nanomaterials and New Technology,” congressional briefing
12:00 - 1:30 pm, G11 Dirksen Senate Office Building
NASA: STEM Engagement Advisory Committee meeting
12:30 - 5:00 pm, NASA headquarters (300 E St. SW, DC)
Webcast available
ITIF: “Why It’s Time for the United States to Develop a National AI Strategy”
1:00 - 2:30 pm, 562 Dirksen Senate Office Building
National Academies: “Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects,” report release webinar
1:00 - 2:00 pm
Wednesday, December 5 NASA: National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board meeting
(continues Thursday)
9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Wed; 9:00 am - 1:00 pm, Thu
Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach (Redondo Beach, CA)
POSTPONED -- Senate: “China’s Non-Traditional Espionage Against the United States: The Threat and Potential Policy Responses”
10:00 am, Judiciary Committee (226 Dirksen Office Building)
POSTPONED -- House: “DOD’s Artificial Intelligence Structure, Investments, and Applications”
10:00 am, Armed Services Committee (2118 Rayburn Office Building)
POSTPONED -- Hudson Institute: “A.I. and Quantum Technology: Implications for U.S. National Security”
11:30 am - 1:30 pm, Hudson Institute headquarters (1201 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, DC)
New America: “Accuracy for All: Community Land Mapping and the Navigation Satellite Revolution”
12:30 - 2:00 pm, New America headquarters (740 15th St. NW, DC)
POSTPONED -- Senate: “Review the Future of Nuclear Power: Advanced Reactors”
2:30 pm, Appropriations Committee (138 Dirksen Office Building)
National Academies: “Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges”, report release
4:00 - 5:00 pm, National Academy of Sciences (2101 Constitution Ave. NW, DC)
Webcast available
Thursday, December 6 DOE: Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee meeting
(continues Friday)
8:30 am - 4:45 pm, Thu; 8:30 am - 12:00 pm, Fri
Canopy by Hilton (North Bethesda, MD)
Webcast available
NSF: Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Advisory Committee meeting
(continues Friday)
8:45 am - 5:00 pm, Thu; 9:00 am - 1:15 pm, Fri
NSF headquarters (Alexandria, VA)
POSTPONED -- House: “Exploring Alternatives to Fetal Tissue Research”
10:00 am, Oversight and Government Reform Committee (2154 Rayburn Office Building)
Business Roundtable: CEO Innovation Summit
1:00 - 6:00 pm, The Anthem (901 Wharf St. SW, DC)
DOI: National Geospatial Advisory Committee teleconference
1:00 - 4:30 pm
EPA: Interagency Committee on Radiation Standards meeting
1:00 - 4:30 pm, EPA headquarters (1201 Constitution Ave. NW, DC)
UMD: “Quantum Hegemony? — China’s Ambitions and Advances in Quantum S&T”
1:30 pm, University of Maryland (College Park, MD)
Washington Post: “Transformers: Defense”
4:00 - 5:30 pm, Webcast available
Carnegie Institution: “The Big Ones: The National Disasters That Have Shaped Our Science and Our Culture”
6:30 - 7:45 pm, Carnegie Institution for Science (1530 P St. NW, DC)
Webcast available
Friday, December 7 NASA: Technology, Innovation, and Engineering Advisory Committee meeting
8:00 am - 4:30 pm, NASA headquarters (300 E St. SW, DC)
Webcast available
Monday, December 10 AGU: Fall meeting
(continues through Friday)
Washington Convention Center (801 Mount Vernon Place NW, DC)
DOD: Science, Technology, and Innovation Exchange
(continues Tuesday)
10:00 am - 4:00 pm, Mon; 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Tue
U.S. Institute of Peace (2301 Constitution Ave. NW, DC)
NASA: Advisory Council Meeting
(continues Tuesday)
1:30 - 6:00 pm, Mon; 9:00 am - 12:00 pm, Tue
NASA headquarters (300 E St. SW, DC)
Webcast available
Atlantic Council: “American Research Leadership to Ensure a Safe Climate”
4:30 - 6:30 pm, 2075 Rayburn House Office Building
National Academies: “No More Time To Waste: Moving Science To Action At Scales That Matter”
7:00 - 8:45 pm, Keck Center (500 5th St. NW, DC)
Opportunities
Deadline Nears for Congressional S&T Policy Fellowships
AIP and several of its Member Societies are accepting applications for their 2019-2020 congressional science and technology policy fellowship programs. For the AIP fellowship, interested individuals must have a Ph.D. in the physical sciences and be a member of at least one Member Society. Details about the fellowships, which have variable application deadlines, are available here .
Duke Seeking Director for Science and Society Center
The Duke Initiative for Science and Society is seeking a director for its Center for Science, Technology, Policy and Society. The center’s emphasis is “advocating for and contributing to activities that focus on the intersection of science and policy, as well as science and societal interest.” Applications are due Dec. 31.
Reviewers Sought for IPCC Reports
The State Department is requesting expert reviewers for two Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports related to land and oceans as well as their associated summary for policymakers. The purpose of the review is to “ensure the reports present a comprehensive, objective, and balanced view of the areas they cover.” Input will be accepted through Dec. 19.
Know of an upcoming science policy opportunity? Email us at fyi@aip.org.Know of an upcoming science policy event? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
White House
- White House to hold roundtable with tech executives on innovation (Reuters)
- Fact Check: Trump’s thin grasp of trade, science policy (AP)
- Trump’s gut vs. the government on science, economy, intelligence (CNN)
- Trump tries to quell climate attention. It rises instead (E&E News)
- Trump dismantling US climate efforts as warnings grow dire (AP)
- Trump’s ‘Energy Dominance’ doctrine is undermined by climate change (New York Times)
Congress
- ‘Just a lot of alarmism’: Trump’s skepticism of climate science is echoed across GOP (Washington Post)
- GOP messaging shift stresses need for innovation (E&E News)
- Meet the scholar crafting the ‘Green New Deal’ (E&E News)
- Response to concerns about awarding Presidential Citation to Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) (American Geophysical Union)
- Yucca spat re-emerges as Congress scrambles to avert shutdown (E&E News)
- Google chief executive Sundar Pichai set to testify to Congress in December (Washington Post)
Political Engagement
- Science should be nonpartisan, inform government policy (The Daily Californian, perspective by Christopher Jackson)
Science, Society, and the Economy
- A veteran science reporter’s stint in the Obama White House forced some soul searching about journalistic access (Undark, perspective by Rick Weiss)
- Scientific communication in a post-truth society (PNAS, paper by Shanto Iyengar and Douglas Massey)
- The myth of apolitical science (Science, book review)
- Cancer or climate change: which cure would you invest in? (Financial Times, perspective by Robin Harding)
- Define the human right to science (Science, perspective by Jessica Wyndham and Margaret Vitullo)
- Four facts everyone ought to know about science: The two-culture concerns of Philip W. Anderson (Physics in Perspective, paper by Andrew Zhang and Andrew Zangwill)
- Google employees go public to protest China search engine Dragonfly (Washington Post)
Education and Workforce
- China expands research funding, luring US scientists and students (NPR)
- University of Illinois insures against drop in Chinese students (Inside Higher Ed)
- Merit-based rule proposed to create more effective and efficient H-1B visa program (DHS)
- Does science have a bullying problem? (Nature)
- Ban bullying in science (Nature, editorial)
- Scientists share MIT ‘disobedience’ award for #MeToo advocacy (ScienceInsider)
- #MeToo activist BethAnn McLaughlin is focused on scientists (Boston Globe)
- Neil deGrasse Tyson denies misconduct accusations (New York Times)
- Sexual misconduct in academia (Physics Today, perspective by Emma Chapman)
- The key to fixing the gender gap in math and science: Boost women’s confidence (The Conversation, perspective by Lara Perez-Felkner)
Research Management
- Funders flesh out details of Europe’s bold open-access plan (Nature)
- Openness in science is good, but we need to assess it in the context of how it benefits our competitors (Wall Street Journal, perspective by Jim Ling)
- Companion guidelines on replication and reproducibility in education research (NSF/DOEd)
- Industry is more alarmed about reproducibility than academia (Nature, perspective by Anton Bespalov, et al.)
- University creates new research integrity position after high profile misconduct cases (Duke Chronicle)
- Theoretical physics has not gone to the dogs (Quantum Frontiers, perspective by Nicole Halpern)
Labs and Facilities
- Neutron production at ORNL’s Spallation Neutron Source reaches design power level (Oak Ridge National Lab)
- LLNL’s radiochemistry labs receive extensive upgrades (Lawrence Livermore National Lab)
- Los Alamos National Lab employees with radiation-linked cancers have been forced to wait years for potential benefits (Pacific Standard)
- Belgium presses on with accelerator-driven research reactor (Physics Today)
Energy
- US nuclear industry fights for survival (Physics Today)
- Scientists in the US and Japan get serious about low-energy nuclear reactions (IEEE Spectrum)
- Trump administration to let companies run deafening seismic tests that can kill marine life, a step toward oil drilling in Atlantic (Washington Post)
Quantum Science and Technology
- For all times, for all peoples: How replacing the kilogram empowers industry (NIST, perspective by Jim Olthoff)
- Quantum Computing: Research Triangle’s next high-tech cluster? (Triangle Business Journal)
- ‘Quantum healing’ is the new snake oil (TNW)
Space
- Trump’s Moon Man (Politico, interview with Jim Bridenstine)
- Moon exploration is back in fashion as nations vie in space race (Nature)
- NASA’s OSIRIS-REx spacecraft to arrive at Bennu after long journey (NBC News)
- Mars beckons (New York Times, editorial)
- After the success of InSight, it’s time for NASA to commit to Mars Sample Return (Planetary Society, perspective by Casey Dreier)
- A history of all the times we’ve sent missions to Mars and failed (Discover)
- MarCO success vindicates use of cubesats on deep space missions (SpaceNews)
- The search for alien life begins in Earth’s oldest desert (The Atlantic)
- The dawn of interplanetary geology (The Atlantic)
- Moon landings, space mining, and Space Force capture imaginations at SpaceCom (Houston Chronicle)
- Soyuz launches new crew to space station (SpaceNews)
- Former Air Force general picked to lead FAA commercial space office (SpaceNews)
- NASA catches glimpse of hard-charging Curiosity rover just before InSight’s communications go dark (The Onion)
Weather, Climate, and Environment
- Trump’s EPA chief said there was ‘no political review’ of climate report (Washington Post)
- Zinke questions methodology of federal climate report (The Hill)
- Trump’s nominee for USDA science post calls new US climate report ‘genuine’ (ScienceInsider)
- Failing to address climate change threatens the economy (Senate Joint Economic Committee Democrats, report)
- The climate won’t crash the economy (Wall Street Journal, perspective by Steven Koonin)
- The other climate report the Trump administration published on Black Friday (Washington Post)
- Climate concerns increase; most Republicans now acknowledge change (Monmouth University Polling Institute)
- Countries vowed to cut carbon emissions. They aren’t even close to their goals, UN report finds (Washington Post)
- World faces ‘impossible’ task at post-Paris climate talks (AP)
- Court forces University of Arizona to release climate scientists’ traditionally confidential emails (Weather Underground)
- Climate scientist Michael Mann releases emails ahead of University of Arizona response to E&E Legal (Desmog Blog)
- A rush to judgment: The Trump administration is taking science out of air quality standards (The Conversation, perspective by H. Christopher Frey)
Defense
- Primer on defense RDT&E (CRS)
- Wilson asks team ‘to scrub it again’ after reviewing preliminary S&T review results (Inside Defense)
- DOD spending doesn’t align with push for innovation and near-peer competition, analysts say (Federal News Network)
- The Pentagon must pay more than lip service to innovative companies (Defense One, perspective by Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA))
- After a hiatus, China accelerates cyberspying efforts to obtain US technology (New York Times)
- China’s ominous plan to ‘penetrate and sway’ the US (Washington Post, editorial)
- Trump administration’s proposed export controls could hinder tech research (Axios)
- As the Arctic ice melts, US prepares for possible threats from Russia and China (Washington Post)
- Pentagon builds mega-database for spectrum and electronic warfare (Breaking Defense)
- It’s down to the wire for Space Force legislative proposal (SpaceNews)
- White House seeks alternatives to independent Space Force (Defense One)
- NNSA has taken steps to prepare to restart a program to replace the W78 warhead capability (GAO, report)
- Why America needs low-yield nuclear warheads now (Washington Post, perspective by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Michael Morell)
- Why insisting North Korean nuclear declaration up front is a big mistake (38 North, perspective by Siegfried Hecker)
- Plan to leave buried nuclear bomb waste underground draws fire (Bloomberg)
- Disposal of surplus plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (National Academies, report)
Biomedical
- An ‘epic scientific misadventure’: NIH Director Francis Collins ponders fallout from CRISPR baby study (ScienceInsider)
- China halts work by scientist who says he edited babies’ genes (New York Times)
- Could anyone have stopped the gene-edited babies experiment? (AP)
- In China, gene-edited babies are the latest in a string of ethical dilemmas (New York Times)
- ‘Expedite the translation.’ A billionaire keeps the big gifts for medical research flowing (Inside Philanthropy)
International Affairs
- Which nations have surged forward on research productivity? (Times Higher Education)
- Research ministers agree outline deal on Horizon Europe (Science|Business)
- EU begins discussions on Horizon Europe with eight countries (Science|Business)
- Science cloud launches with many questions unanswered (*Research)
- Industry, universities and national funding agencies unite to oppose EU plan to make more research data public (Science|Business)
- UK science minister Sam Gyimah resigns over Prime Minister May’s Brexit deal (The Guardian)
- UKRI will decide scope of Plan S next year (*Research)
- In search of new partners, Japan’s top research institute opens base in Brussels (Science|Business)
- China sets out for the far side of the moon (Science)
- How science supports São Paulo (Nature)
- On science in a small country (Physics Today)