FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

House Appropriations Committee Approves FY 2016 DOE Office of Science Funding Bill

APR 23, 2015

Yesterday the full House Appropriations Committee approved its FY 2016 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill. The House is scheduled to consider this bill next week.

In opening yesterday’s markup session, Committee Chairman Harold Rogers (R-KY) noted this was the earliest in the year, since at least since 1974, that House appropriators have met to approve funding bills. (The committee also acted on the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs bill.) The committee has been off to a fast start, holding more than 100 hearings this year on various federal programs. Rogers spoke of his and Ranking Member Nita Lowey’s (D-NY) commitment to the committee’s historic tradition of congeniality. With changes in the Senate, Rogers spoke optimistically of sending individual bills to the White House.

“This is a strong bill” Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Mike Simpson (R-ID) said when introducing the $35.4 billion bill. Minority Member Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) thanked Simpson for his cooperation in drafting the bill, but noted the difficulty the subcommittee had with its funding allocation.

The Appropriations Committee has posted the draft report accompanying its funding bill. The committee’s recommendations regarding the Office of Science are found on pages 102-108. Also see funding tables on pages 141-143.

Total Office of Science:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $5,067.7 million
The FY 2016 request is $5,339.8 million, an increase of $272.1 million or 5.4 percent
The House bill provides $5,100.0 million, an increase of $32.3 million or 0.6 percent

Within the Office of Science are the following selected programs:

Advanced Scientific Computing Research:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $541.0 million
The FY 2016 request is $621.0 million, an increase of $80.0 million or 14.8 percent
The House bill provides $537.5 million, a decrease of $3.5 million or 0.7 percent

Basic Energy Sciences:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $1,733.2 million
The FY 2016 request is $1,849.3 million, an increase of $116.1 million or 6.7 percent
The House bill provides $1,770.3 million, an increase of $37.1 million or 2.1 percent

Biological and Environmental Research:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $592.0 million
The FY 2016 request is $612.4 million, an increase of $20.4 million or 3.5 percent
The House bill provides $538.0 million, a decrease of $54.0 million or 9.1 percent

Fusion Energy Sciences:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $467.5 million
The FY 2016 request is $420.0 million, a decrease of $47.5 million or 10.2 percent
The House bill provides $467.6 million, an increase of $0.1 million or level funding

High Energy Physics:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $766.0 million
The FY 2016 request is $788.0 million, an increase of $22.0 million or 2.9 percent
The House bill provides $776.0 million, an increase of $10.0 million or 1.3 percent

Nuclear Physics:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $595.5 million
The FY 2016 request is $624.6 million, an increase of $29.1 million or 4.9 percent
The House bill provides $616.2 million, an increase of $20.7 million or 3.5 percent

Also see page 79 for report language regarding the “proliferation of centers.”

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
However, the agency’s proposed rule would remove requirements to keep radiation “as low as reasonably achievable.”
FYI
/
Article
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought defended a sprawling proposed rule that has drawn tens of thousands of public comments over the past month.
FYI
/
Article
Committee Democrats argued the hearing was a distraction and an excuse to slash spending.
FYI
/
Article
The agency released plans to develop a quantum computer to advance scientific R&D following two presidential orders on quantum.
/
Article
/
Article
Researchers don’t need to do science engagement alone. Working with professionals makes the job easier and more effective and can lead to better science.
/
Article
Even a limited nuclear war could disrupt the climate, ecosystems, and global food supplies. Nuclear strategies and decisions should be required to factor in those potential consequences.
/
Article
A dataset of daily ozone concentrations with high spatial resolution enables researchers to identify the reversal.

Related Organizations