Former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci testifying before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in July 2026.
Sipa USA via AP
Scientists decry Fauci prosecution threat
A Senate committee contempt resolution and referral for prosecution against former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Anthony Fauci has drawn concern from scientists. Current and former National Institutes of Health employees had issued a letter of support for Fauci, echoing scientific groups. The 8-5 resolution vote was decided along partisan lines on Thursday. Afterward, Ashish Jha, the Biden administration COVID czar and past dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, criticized the move as “essentially trying to criminalize government scientists,” in comments to Axios.
Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment in refusing to answer questions at the July Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing chaired by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY). Paul had previously clashed with Fauci and called for his imprisonment. In bypassing a full Senate vote on the contempt resolution, Paul’s request for the Justice Department to prosecute Fauci has raised legal questions. A University of Kentucky law professor told Politico the request fell into “a bit of a gray area,” while a congressional investigations expert called the request ”null and void,” in comments to Reuters.
For now, a decision to take up the charge rests with the Justice Department. The request raises questions of presidential pardon immunity, the constitutional right against self-incrimination, and congressional investigation prerogatives. If Democrats retake the House in November, American Governance Institute executive director Daniel Schuman notes that congressional committees may begin investigating Trump administration officials, with the Fauci case setting a precedent for handling contempt resolutions. A contempt of Congress prosecution carries a fine of up to $100,000 and a jail sentence of up to one year.
National Academies orders probe of climate science peer-review process
The National Academy of Sciences announced an independent review of its development of the climate science chapter of a major scientific reference for federal judges. NAS is removing the chapter from its website while the review is underway. Up to this point, the organization has stood by the chapter, rebuffing a February request from 27 Republican attorneys general to remove it. Since then, President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers have heightened the scrutiny of the chapter and other climate-related NAS projects, notably a recent report on attribution science. Trump proposed defunding NAS in July, saying its “fraudulent, biased, and misleading” editions of the reference manual have created “huge losses” across the country in court cases on climate change. Nearly half of NAS revenue, some $189 million, came from government contracts in 2025.
Authors of the reference manual have previously described its peer review process as “extensive and rigorous.” NAS said it has an obligation to honestly examine questions of bias and conflicts of interest and take action accordingly. The academy also noted that the assessment is “about the process used to produce the chapter and not about the validity of climate science.”
DOE secretary referred to DOJ over blue state grant cancellations
Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright is under fire over June testimony that $7.5 billion in clean energy project terminations were not driven by political retaliation. Two Democrats on the House Science Committee, Ranking Member Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Rep. Gabe Amo (D-RI), charge Wright lied to Congress in a referral to the Justice Department over the claim.
The lawmakers cited a July federal lawsuit acknowledgment by the Justice Department that the 321 terminations were “based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient’s state,” some 16 that had voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. “It is a weighty thing to assert that a Cabinet Secretary lied to Congress,” said the lawmakers in their referral. “But the facts of the situation are clear and undeniable.”
The Energy Department pushed back on the charge. “The Secretary’s statements in his testimony are correct. None of the termination decisions were based on political considerations,” an agency spokesperson said.
Also on our radar
Failing to reestablish semiconductor R&D entities may leave the US reliant on other countries for chip technologies, a new GAO report says.
GAO found errors and largely unverifiable estimates in DOGE’s federal cost-cutting calculations.
APS is crowdsourcing ideas to “position the NSF to meet the evolving needs of the nation, its citizens, and science.” It plans to develop policy proposals and legislative language for consideration by January.
DOE is seeking contributors for a suite of open-weight foundation models for accelerating scientific discovery as part of the Genesis Mission.
The Department of Education published a letter highlighting research security as a central issue for higher education, asking institutions to publicly describe how they defend against foreign influence, among other topics. The letter departs from the prescriptive “compact” the administration offered to universities last year.
The Department of Education recently updated its website sharing details of universities’ self-reported foreign gifts and contracts worth $250,000 or more.
Former Deputy Surgeon General Erica Schwartz was confirmed as CDC director last week. The agency has not had a permanent director since Susan Monarez was ousted in August 2025. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya has served as acting CDC director since mid-February, exceeding the usual 210-day time limit.
The exodus of non-US citizens has “certainly” been influenced by science funding and visa policy changes under Trump, a new AIP report says.
Upcoming Events
Duration of status rule changes webinar
On Aug. 12, AIP will host a federation-wide webinar on a recent immigration rule change that will cap student visas to a maximum of four years and eliminate the decades-old duration of status system. The goal of the webinar is to help attendees better understand the final rule and its impact on international students and visitors. The program will feature speakers from AIP, FYI Science Policy News, and the Institute for Progress (IFP), with time for an extended audience Q&A. Click here to register.
All events are Eastern Time unless otherwise noted. Listings do not imply endorsement. Events beyond this week are listed on our website.
Deadlines indicated in parentheses. Newly added opportunities are marked with a diamond.
AIP Science Policy Fellowships
AIP is opening applications for year-long science policy fellowships to support Congress and the State Department. Fellows will provide scientific guidance to directly shape legislative and policymaking processes. Congressional fellows will serve as staff in congressional offices or committees, while State Department fellows will focus on foreign policy issues. Fellowships are open to members of AIP Member Societies. Applications open Aug. 1.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
The response to the OMB’s proposed rule on federal financial assistance appears to be overwhelmingly negative, with strong opposition from science groups.
July 15, 2026 05:22 PM
Subscribe to FYI This Week
FYI This Week
Start your week with a briefing on the latest science policy news.