FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

House FY 2016 NIST Appropriations Bill

MAY 27, 2015
henry-mike-150-2.jpg
Former Director of FYI

The House Appropriations Committee has proposed reducing spending levels at the National Institute of Standards and Technology by 1.0 percent in FY 2016.

On May 20, the House Appropriations Committee approved the FY 2016 Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill by voice vote. The bill is accompanied by a committee report , which provides guiding recommendations on programs, priorities, and appropriations levels for NIST and the other departments and agencies funded by this bill. The report represents the views of the House Appropriations Committee, although the committee’s recommendations may or may not be reflected in the Joint Explanatory Statement that will accompany the final appropriations bill. The final outcome will depend on the Senate’s recommendations as well as reconciliation between the Senate and House versions of the bill.

This FYI reviews selected NIST programs discussed on pages 12-14 of the committee report.

Total NIST:

The FY 2015 appropriation was $863.9 million
The FY 2016 request is $1,119.7 million, an increase of $255.8 million or 29.6 percent
The House bill provides $855.0 million, a decrease of $8.9 million or 1.0 percent below current funding

The committee report cites concerns “about security-related issues at NIST, in particular potential inappropriate access of foreign nationals to NIST facilities and information systems.”

Scientific and Technical Research and Services:

The FY 2015 appropriation was $675.5 million
The FY 2016 request is $754.7 million, an increase of $79.2 million or 11.7 percent
The House bill provides $675.0 million, essentially the same level as current funding

The committee recommendation includes the requested increases for the Materials Genome Initiative ; Disaster Resilient Buildings and Infrastructure ; Strengthening NIST Cryptographic and Privacy Capabilities; and Quantum-Based Sensors and Measurements. With regards to the NIST’s initiative on windstorm impact reduction and research , the report states:

As part of its efforts to improve the resiliency of buildings, NIST’s Engineering Division is encouraged to partner with academic research institutions that have expertise in the effects of natural disasters to replicate high-force windstorm impacts on buildings and test large, integrated models of such impacts.”

The committee recommendation does not provide funding for the lab-to-market program.

Industrial Technology Services:

The FY 2015 appropriation was $138.1 million
The FY 2016 request is $306.0, an increase of $167.9 million or 121.6 percent
The House bill provides $130.0 million, a decrease of $8.1 million or 5.9 percent below current funding

In reference to NIST’s advanced manufacturing initiative , the report states:

The Committee encourages the Department [of Commerce]…to examine the possibility of establishing regional collaborative networks with advanced manufacturing communities that make full use of the Department’s [Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership ] program centers involved in advanced manufacturing to ensure the participation of…the national laboratories in technology transfer….

Construction of Research Facilities:

The FY 2015 appropriation was $50.3 million
The FY 2016 request is $59.0 million, an increase of $8.7 million or 17.3 percent

The House bill provides $50.0 million, a decrease of $0.3 million or 0.6 percent below current funding

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
The response to the OMB’s proposed rule on federal financial assistance appears to be overwhelmingly negative, with strong opposition from science groups.
FYI
/
Article
However, the agency’s proposed rule would remove requirements to keep radiation “as low as reasonably achievable.”
FYI
/
Article
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought defended a sprawling proposed rule that has drawn tens of thousands of public comments over the past month.
FYI
/
Article
Committee Democrats argued the hearing was a distraction and an excuse to slash spending.
/
Article
/
Article
Researchers don’t need to do science engagement alone. Working with professionals makes the job easier and more effective and can lead to better science.
/
Article
Even a limited nuclear war could disrupt the climate, ecosystems, and global food supplies. Nuclear strategies and decisions should be required to factor in those potential consequences.
/
Article
A dataset of daily ozone concentrations with high spatial resolution enables researchers to identify the reversal.

Related Organizations