FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

Results of FY 1997 Appropriations Process

OCT 08, 1996

In a race to the wire, the final FY 1997 appropriations were passed by Congress less than 24 hours before the new fiscal year began on October 1. A total of 7 out of the 13 appropriations bills had already been passed individually, including the Energy and Water Development bill, which supports most of the science programs of the Department of Energy, and the VA/HUD/Independent Agencies bill, which funds NSF and NASA. The remaining departments, agencies, and programs were bundled together in an omnibus funding package that was added on to the DOD appropriations bill (H.R. 3610.) In a rush to adjourn and begin campaigning, Members of Congress relented on many of the increases desired by President Clinton. For selected programs, it might be instructive to look at how much of the Administration’s budget request for FY 1997 was actually provided by Congress. Below are a number of physics-related programs, as well as a few non-physics programs for perspective, and the percent of the President’s request that they received in appropriations.

Agency/Program

% of President’s FY 1997 Request

NIH

103.00%

NASA Human Space Flight

100

NASA Space Science

100

NSF Education & Human Resources

100

Veterans’ Affairs

100

DOE Basic Energy Sciences

99.4

NASA Total

99.3

DOE Nuclear Physics

99.2

NIST STRS (Laboratories)

99

DOE High Energy Physics

98.7

NSF Research & Related Activities

98.4

NSF Total

98.3

Transportation Department

97.4

Interior Department

97.1

Environmental Protection Agency

95.3

DOE Fusion Energy Sciences

91

NIST Manufacturing Extension Partnerships

90.5

Housing and Urban Development

88.6

NSF Major Research Equipment

84.2

National Service Program

73.8

NIST Advanced Technology Program

65.2

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
Current and former employees at NSF, NASA, NIH, and the EPA have signed onto letters enumerating their concerns.
FYI
/
Article
Top appropriators in both parties have signaled disagreement with Trump’s proposals for deep cuts and indirect cost caps.
FYI
/
Article
The new model would rename facilities and administrative costs and change how they are calculated.
FYI
/
Article
Trump’s nominee to lead NOAA said he backs the president’s proposed cuts while expressing support for the agency’s mission.

Related Organizations