FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

Labor-HHS Appropriations: National Testing, Eisenhower Issues Resolved

NOV 12, 1997

One of the main roadblocks keeping Members of Congress from heading home for the rest of the year has been a disagreement over national educational testing provisions in the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education spending bill for FY 1998 (H.R. 2264.) Inability to resolve a conflict with the Administration on this bill and several others (including Commerce-Justice-State and the District of Columbia), has forced Congress to pass its fifth short-term “continuing resolution” since the beginning of the new fiscal year on October 1, in order to keep the programs funded by these bills operating.

The logjam on the education bill was finally broken on November 7, when the Administration and conferees agreed to a compromise on President Clinton’s plan for national testing of fourth-graders in reading and eighth-graders in math. The final bill was passed later that day by the House on a 352-65 vote. The Senate passed it, by 91-4, in a rare Saturday session the following day. Although reports indicate that Congress hopes to adjourn for the year by the end of this week, conflicts continue on at least one of the remaining appropriations bills.

The controversy over testing revolved around the Administration’s plans to develop voluntary tests so schools around the country could compare the performance of their students against national expectations. Many Republicans opposed this effort as a move toward federal control of schools, and some Democrats worried that such tests might stigmatize poor and minority students. An amendment to the House bill would have disallowed any funding to be used for such an effort, but this provision drew a veto threat from Clinton.

After several false starts, language was drafted that was acceptable to both sides. The compromise would allow development of such tests to continue, but remove it from federal control and give it to the independent National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB.) The NAGB already oversees the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a series of tests given on a variety of subjects to a sampling of students across the country (see FYI #128 .) The National Academy of Sciences would be asked to study the test development process and consider ways in which the same purpose might be served by revising currently-available tests, such as the NAEP. Delaying the Administration’s plans and ensuring that Congress will reassess the issue next year, the agreement prohibits any funding from being used to implement field trials of the tests during FY 1998.

Another issue resolved in the Labor-HHS bill was the status of Eisenhower grants for teachers’ professional development. An earlier Senate version of the bill directed that the Eisenhower program, along with a number of other targeted federal education programs, be combined into block grants for the states to use as they saw fit. This provision was removed in the final conference report, enabling the Eisenhower funds to remain targeted for teacher development. Funding for the grants was increased by $25 million over FY 1997, to $335 million, with the first $250 million specifically intended for science and math teachers.

/
Article
The precision measurement and quantum communities are upset about the secretiveness of the move and its potential damage to US science.
/
Article
/
Article
In noisy biological environments, the fluorescent protein can pinpoint subcellular structures and detect magnetic field changes.
/
Article
Two cylinders rotating in a fluid can mimic the behavior of gears and of a belt-and-pulley system.
More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
Proposed changes would reduce independent oversight of RIFs and other disciplinary actions against federal employees.
FYI
/
Article
The head of the initiative emphasized the importance of data scaling and adding computational power in remarks at Brookhaven National Lab.
FYI
/
Article
Where the Trump administration has and has not stuck to the conservative policy blueprint.
FYI
/
Article
Science groups call for stable funding and streamlined regulations.