FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld Discusses Defense S&T Funding

JAN 29, 2001

Earlier this month, at the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the nomination of Donald Rumsfeld to be Secretary of Defense, Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) discussed defense science and technology funding. Senator Bingaman’s question, and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s reply, follow:

SENATOR BINGAMAN: One of the issues that we always hear a lot of talk about but...at least in my view has not been given adequate priority in defense budgeting is science and technology. It seems like at least for the last several years every time we see a defense budget proposed by the administration the percentage of the Defense budget that is committed to science and technology is reduced. It always loses out as compared to procurement, as compared to readiness, compared to all these other things. I know that President Bush, President-elect Bush gave a speech at the Citadel a year and a half ago where he talked about the importance of science and technology investment. And he said he was committing an additional $20 billion, or he would if elected president commit an additional $20 billion, to defense research and development
between now and 2006. I think that was the commitment he made in that speech, or the statement he made.

Let me add one other aspect of this. The reductions in growth in defense research and development in recent years has been justified in some of our hearings on the basis that the industrial companies will pick up the difference here, that U.S. industry is sufficiently strong that we don’t need to do what we once did in science and technology. That to my mind is very much at odds with what I understand is happening to our defense industrial base. They do not have the luxury of putting substantial new resources into this area.

So I would be interested in any comments you’ve got about how we can increase research and development, defense-related research and development and support for science and technology.

MR. RUMSFELD: Senator, I agree completely with everything you’ve said. ...when President-elect Bush announced that I was his choice for this post, I said that I had visited with him, I had read his pronouncements and plans for defense, and that I supported them enthusiastically. And certainly with respect to science and technology, he’s on the mark and you’re on the mark, and I agree.

I came out of the pharmaceutical business, where we invest in research and development that is not guaranteed to produce anything in the next five minutes. And you have to be patient and you have to live with a lot of failures. I’ve been involved
in the electronics business, quite the same. If you’re not investing for the future, you’re going to die. You simply run out of gas at a certain point. And this wonderful country of ours has such fine leadership in science and technology potentially. But the reality is an awful lot of the foreign students who used to come over here and stay and study are now going back to their countries, and they’re leaving with an enormous amount of knowledge. And the country, this committee, this department simply must be willing to make those investments.

SENATOR BINGAMAN: Well, thank you for that answer.

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
The commission adopted the rule without addressing concerns about proposed satellites’ impacts on scientific observations.
FYI
/
Article
The exodus of non-US citizens has “certainly” been influenced by science funding and visa policy changes under Trump, a new AIP report says.
FYI
/
Article
Some of the most important decision-makers in science policy are facing voters in primaries and general elections this year.
FYI
/
Article
A new OSTP report recommends channeling funding to researchers with big ideas, not elite universities.
/
Article
Students from numerous countries gathered in Sweden and Colombia to solve challenging theoretical and experimental physics problems.
/
Article
Academics in the child-friendly nation face career disadvantages, such as lower employment rates, after becoming parents.
/
Article
A new version of a technique that images samples with the help of light that never reaches them brings researchers closer to the goal of reducing radiation exposure in medical imaging.