FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

FY 2003 Request for U.S. Geological Survey

FEB 14, 2002

Program and facilities funding for the U.S. Geological Survey would decline 5.1% under the FY 2003 budget request that the Bush Administration has sent to Congress. Few program budgets would increase under this proposal, with the majority slated for cuts or level funding. In addition, a USGS program would be transferred to the National Science Foundation.

A change in how retirement and health benefits would be charged requires an adjustment in the USGS “bottom line.” After accounting for this change in both the current year and in the FY 2003 request, the USGS budget would decline 5.1%, or $46.7 million, from $914.0 million to $867.3 million. (Including these benefits results in a decline of 4.8%.)

In describing the request, USGS Director Charles Groat stated, “We will continue our emphasis on providing sound science on public lands in support of other Interior bureaus, enabling them to more effectively and efficiently fulfill their resource management and protection responsibilities. Our broad range of expertise in mapping, geology, hydrology and biology is proving to be an important part of the science foundation needed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service to address complex resource management issues on lands they manage.”

The survey’s budget has six components. Funding would decline for each of them under the administration’s request, as follows:

Mapping, Remote Sensing, and Geographic Investigations: Down 3.0%, or $4.0 million, from $133.3 million to $129.3 million.

Geologic Hazards, Resources, and Processes: Down 3.5%, or $8.2 million, from $232.8 million to $224.7 million.

Water Resources Investigations: Down 13.6%, or $28.0 million, from $205.8 million to $177.8 million. The Toxic Substances Hydrology Program, which now receives $13.9 million, would be transferred to the National Science Foundation to “initiate a competitive-grants process to address water-quality issues.” The NSF budget includes $10.0 million for this program, a cut of 28.1%. The National Water-Quality Assessment Program would be cut by $5.8 million, which USGS states “reflects a plan to secure funding from partners and customers to maintain NAWQA’s current schedule and scope.”

Biological Research: Down 3.6%, or $5.9 million, from $166.4 million to $160.5 million.

Science Support: Down 0.2%, or $0.151 million, from $86.3 million to $86.1 million.

Facilities: Down 0.5%, or $0.470 million, from $89.4 million to $89.0 million.

A USGS brief identifies five new science activities for FY 2003: Energy Resource Assessments, Restoration of the Everglades, Digital Base Mapping, Environment and Human Health, and Geographic Information Systems.

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
If finalized, the rule could end federal grant funding for major scientific collaborations.
FYI
/
Article
Some of the most important decision-makers in science policy are facing voters in primaries and general elections this year.
FYI
/
Article
Staff communications from December reveal deliberations over which programs to “defend” and which ones might be shuttered or transferred.
FYI
/
Article
Democrats used the opportunity to challenge the department’s decision-making on a host of science topics, including Genesis, clean-energy projects, and last year’s Climate Working Group report.
/
Article
By tweaking a standard microscale gyroscope, researchers were able to significantly amplify the signals used to measure rotation.
/
Article
When rubber-soled shoes skid on a hardwood floor, slip pulses travel between the two surfaces at high speeds to produce the familiar sound.
/
Article
/
Article
Nuclear winter, climate change, bioterrorism, AI. Those and other threats are growing in potential impact. What can we do?
/
Article
The specialized devices are democratizing access to cosmic-ray experiments.

Related Organizations