FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

FY 2008 DOD Bill Complete: Total S&T Funding Down, Basic Research Up

NOV 09, 2007

Just before midnight, the Senate passed the FY 2008 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill. Following an earlier overwhelming House vote in favor of the bill, H.R. 3222, the $459.3 billion will now be sent to President Bush, who is expected to sign the bill.

The bill provides $12,768.3 million for the three defense science and technology programs, which is 2.78 percent of the total funding in the bill. This figure compares to 2.98 percent in last year’s bill, and 2.96 percent the year before. An August memo by John Young, Director, Defense Research and Engineering, stated “Historically, the Defense Department has pursued a goal of investing 3% of the Department’s budget in S&T. The Administration endorsed the 3% goal in 2001" (see http://www.aip.org/fyi/2007/098.html .)

The final bill also sets limits on indirect cost rates, applying a 35 percent limitation only to basic research:

“SEC. 8115. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds made available in this Act may be used to pay negotiated indirect cost rates on a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement (or similar arrangement) entered into by the Department of Defense and an entity in excess of 35 percent of the total cost of the contract, grant, or agreement (or similar arrangement): Provided, That this limitation shall apply only to contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements entered into after the date of the enactment of this Act using funds made available in this Act for fiscal year 2008 for basic research.”

The House version of the bill recommended a limit of 20 percent (see http://www.aip.org/fyi/2007/081.html ); the Senate bill contained no similar provision.

The following figures were provided by the Coalition for National Security Research, to which AIP and several of its Member Societies belong. Percentage changes are compared to the last fiscal year.

AGGREGATE 6.1 BASIC RESEARCH: Funding increases 4.5%, or $70.1 million from $1,563.7 million to $1,633.7 million. The Administration requested $1,428.1 million.
AGGREGATE 6.2 APPLIED RESEARCH: Funding declines 4.4%, or $233.4 million from $5,329.2 million to $5,095.8 million. The Administration requested $4,356.7 million.
AGGREGATE 6.3 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT: Funding declines 6.1%, or $393.5 million from $6,432.3 million to $6,038.8 million. The Administration requested $4,986.9 million.
TOTAL AGGREGATE 6.1, 6.2, AND 6.3: Funding declines 4.2% or $556.9 million from $13,325.2 million to $12,768.3 million. The Administration requested $10,771.6 million.

ARMY 6.1: Funding increases 4.3% or $15.6 million from $365.9 million to $381.5 million. The Administration requested $305.8 million.
ARMY 6.2: Funding declines 1.7% or $20.5 million from $1,203.8 million to $1,183.3 million. The Administration requested $686.2 million.
ARMY 6.3: Funding increases 6.6% or $82.7 million from $1,263.3 million to $1,346.0 million. The Administration requested $735.9 million.
TOTAL ARMY 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3: Funding increases 2.7% or $77.8 million from $2,833.0 million to $2,910.7 million. The Administration requested $1,728.0 million.

NAVY 6.1: Funding increases 2.9% or $14.4 million from $491.7 million to $506.1 million. The Administration requested $467.3 million.
NAVY 6.2: Funding increases 3.2% or $24.9 million from $785.9 million to $810.8 million. The Administration requested $677.5 million.
NAVY 6.3: Funding declines 4.2% or $32.4 million from $768.1 million to $735.7 million. The Administration requested $521.8 million.
TOTAL NAVY 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3: Funding increases 0.3% or $7.0 million from $2,045.7 million to $2,052.7 million. The Administration requested $1,666.6 million.

AIR FORCE 6.1: Funding declines 0.2% or $0.9 million from $408.6 million to $407.7 million. The Administration requested $375.2 million.
AIR FORCE 6.2: Funding increases 1.5% or $16.9 million from $1,155.5 million to $1,172.4 million. The Administration requested $1,011.1 million.
AIR FORCE 6.3: Funding declines 33.7% or $349.7 million from $1,037.5 million to $687.8 million. The Administration requested $577.3 million.
TOTAL AIR FORCE 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3: Funding declines 12.8% or $333.7 million from $2,061.6 million to $2,267.9 million. The Administration requested $1,963.5 million.

DEFENSE WIDE (DARPA) 6.1: Funding increases 13.7% or $40.8 million from $297.5 million to $338.3 million. The Administration requested $297.9 million.
DEFENSE WIDE 6.2: Funding declines 11.7% or $254.6 million from $2,183.9 million to $1,929.3 million. The Administration requested $1,981.8 million.
DEFENSE WIDE 6.3: Funding declines 2.8% or $94.1 million from $3,363.5 million to $3,269.4 million. The Administration requested $3,151.8 million.
DEFENSE WIDE 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3: Funding declines 5.3% or $307.9 million from $5,844.9 million to $5,537.1 million. The Administration requested $5,413.5 million.

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
The agency seeks flexibility from Congress to form new disposal arrangements with states.
FYI
/
Article
A call for the public to share their experiences on the health impacts of wireless technologies has raised eyebrows among scientists.
FYI
/
Article
The agency issued a memo last week laying out several grantmaking changes, including a new office for metascience.
FYI
/
Article
The ruling put on hold DHS’s plan to cap international student stays at four years, but did not resolve the uncertainty facing international students considering studying in the US.
/
Article
Classical approaches to verifying a subject’s position can be easily fooled. Quantum optics can help, but only if the systems are fast and have low loss.
/
Article
The sweeping federal financial assistance rule proposed by the Office of Management and Budget is on hold. The reprieve may be an opportunity for the rule to fizzle.
/
Article
His 1988 sketch of how to use Antarctic ice to detect neutrinos led to the IceCube observatory, which made the first detections of high-energy neutrinos in 2013.
/
Article
After collecting experimental data from a replica of the renowned bell, researchers used a technique called modal analysis to model its acoustic properties.
/
Article
At the end of the turbulent 1960s, the postwar funding boom in US physics came to a crashing halt. The lessons learned then may be helpful to today’s physicists.

Related Organizations