FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

National Science Board Releases “Science and Engineering Indicators 2008"

JAN 25, 2008

“The Board hopes that both the Administration and Congress find the new quantitative information and analysis in the report useful and timely for informed thinking and planning on national priorities, policies, and programs in science and technology.” -National Science Board Chairman Steven C. Beering

The nation’s most valuable compendium of quantitative information about the U.S. and international science and engineering enterprise was released last week by the National Science Board. “Science and Engineering Indicators 2008" consists of a main volume of approximately 600 pages, and an appendix of 275 tables providing detailed statistical data. Described as “the gold standard” by National Science Board Chairman Steven Beering, this latest submission to the President and Congress is the 18th in this series that is required every two years by the National Science Foundation Act.

NSF’s Division of Science Resources Statistics is responsible for the preparation of this report, which was extensively reviewed before its publication. As described in the report, “SEI is factual and policy-neutral. It does not offer policy options and it does not make policy recommendations.”

Louis J. Lanzerotti, Chair of the National Science Board Subcommittee on Science and Engineering Indicators (who is a member and Chair Designee of the AIP Governing Board); Arthur Reilly, a member of the subcommittee; and Beering discussed the report at a briefing in a House Science and Technology Committee hearing room on January 15. They were joined by National Science Foundation Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Kathie L. Olsen.

The Indicators present a complicated assessment of the nation’s science and engineering enterprise. Lanzerotti presented a series of exhibits highlighting some of the major Indicators. One shows that the United States continues to “hold its own,” he said, in its estimated share of global R&D expenditures In addition, the U.S. share of high-tech manufacturing revenue has doubled since 1995. Another exhibit entitled “intellectual property” demonstrates that the U.S. is in a healthy position when compared to the European Union and Asia. Overall U.S. R&D spending continues to increase. Another exhibit, of “some concern,"shows that federal funding for academic research (most of it basic research) is now declining after adjusting for inflation, with this trend continuing in 2008 and 2009. This is the first time this has occurred in the last quarter century. Federal R&D spending continues the three-decade trend of being heavily weighed toward defense programs (mostly development), with significant growth in health research spending. Global S&E PhD degree attainment is again rising in the United States. Lanzerotti commented that it is “very gratifying” that public attitudes toward research are strongly positive. The percentage of those asked whether the federal government should fund basic research is at its highest point (87%) (beginning in 1985), as is the percentage (41%) of those who feel that the federal government is spending too little on research.

The scope and depth of the full report are great, including an overview and eight chapters on “elementary and secondary education,” “higher education in science and engineering,” “science and engineering labor force,” “research and development: national trends and international linkages,” “academic research and development,” “industry, technology, and the global marketplace,” “science and technology: public attitudes and understanding,” and “state indicators.” Realizing that a “capsule snapshot” of major indicators would be beneficial to many readers, the Board and NSF also issued a “Digest of Key Science and Engineering Indicators 2008.” The Digest reviews R&D investment patterns, selected education indicators, and selected global marketplace indicators. Twenty indicators are presented in a one-page format consisting of a summary statement, an illustrative figure, an explanation of why the indicator is important, key observations, and related discussion.

The National Science Board also released a companion document entitled “Research and Development: Essential Foundation for U.S. Competitiveness in a Global Economy.” Excerpts from this policy document will be provided in a forthcoming issue of FYI.

The full report, appendix, digest, and the companion document are available at the following site: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
The agency seeks flexibility from Congress to form new disposal arrangements with states.
FYI
/
Article
A call for the public to share their experiences on the health impacts of wireless technologies has raised eyebrows among scientists.
FYI
/
Article
The agency issued a memo last week laying out several grantmaking changes, including a new office for metascience.
FYI
/
Article
The ruling put on hold DHS’s plan to cap international student stays at four years, but did not resolve the uncertainty facing international students considering studying in the US.
/
Article
Classical approaches to verifying a subject’s position can be easily fooled. Quantum optics can help, but only if the systems are fast and have low loss.
/
Article
The sweeping federal financial assistance rule proposed by the Office of Management and Budget is on hold. The reprieve may be an opportunity for the rule to fizzle.
/
Article
His 1988 sketch of how to use Antarctic ice to detect neutrinos led to the IceCube observatory, which made the first detections of high-energy neutrinos in 2013.
/
Article
After collecting experimental data from a replica of the renowned bell, researchers used a technique called modal analysis to model its acoustic properties.
/
Article
At the end of the turbulent 1960s, the postwar funding boom in US physics came to a crashing halt. The lessons learned then may be helpful to today’s physicists.

Related Organizations