Letter to House Appropriators Urges Increased Funding for DOE Science Programs
When the House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee approved its FY 2011 funding bill this summer, they recommended
The American Institute of Physics and the American Physical Society were among those signing this letter which was sent by the Energy Sciences Coalition.
The Obama Administration requested
The Senate Appropriations Committee recommended
The FY 2011 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill, as is true with all the FY 2011 funding bills, faces an uncertain future. Reports indicate that Senate appropriators are developing an FY 2011 funding measure that would fold all twelve appropriations bills into a single omnibus bill to fund government functions through the end of next September. Total discretionary spending would be at a level of $1.108 trillion, a level advocated by some Senate Republicans. Senate staff reportedly stated that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) wants to complete the FY 2011 appropriations cycle and is looking to the FY 2012 funding bills to make significant reductions in federal spending. The Office of Science is being funded through a temporary measure (along with the rest of the federal government) that expires December 3.
The top Republican on the House Appropriations Committee, Jerry Lewis does not want to wait until FY 2012 to make these reductions. In a November 4 letter to Appropriations Chairman Obey, Lewis stated
Some Republicans advocate reducing total non-security discretionary spending to pre-stimulus FY 2008 levels. Spending levels would likely vary between individual programs under such an arrangement. The FY 2008 appropriation
Congress returns to Washington a week from today. The letter to Chairman Obey and Ranking Member Lewis follows:
“Dear Chairman Obey and Ranking Member Lewis:
“As you continue your work on the fiscal year 2011 appropriations bills, the undersigned organizations of the Energy Sciences Coalition (ESC) write to express concerns about the funding level provided for the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science in the bill approved by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee, and urge the committee to provide increased funding for the vital basic research it supports.
“Congress committed in 2007 to increase funding for the DOE Office of Science when it enacted the bipartisan America COMPETES Act. In adopting this measure, which was consistent with the innovation agendas of both political parties as well as the recommendations of the National Academies report Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Congress affirmed the importance of basic research to economic growth and energy security. However, the fiscal year 2011 bill approved by the House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee deviates from the COMPETES commitment, providing $4.900 billion for the DOE Office of Science, $4 million below the fiscal year 2010 funding level and $221 million below the Administration request. Without the requested funding, the DOE Office of Science will not be able to support more graduate fellowships, additional Energy Frontier Research Centers, or an Energy Innovation Hub focused on overcoming the challenges of energy storage, and it will be unable to sustain its core research programs and user facilities at fiscal year 2010 levels.
“As the U.S. economy continues to struggle and international competition for quality jobs grows, Congress should not back away from the commitment it made in America COMPETES. Instead, we need to invest in the kind of basic research so critical to improving our energy security and national competitiveness, meeting our environmental challenges, and producing new jobs and innovative technological breakthroughs that will fuel our economy well into the future. We need to invest in basic research at universities and national laboratories, the education and training of thousands of future scientists and engineers, and the operation of one-of-a-kind scientific facilities utilized by over 25,000 scientists annually from industry, academia, and government. In short, we need to invest in the DOE Office of Science, the nation’s primary sponsor of research in the physical sciences, and a unique and critical component of the federal research enterprise.
“We recognize and appreciate the tremendous fiscal constraints the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee faced in crafting its bill in light of its 302(b) allocation. As the process moves forward, however, we would ask that you work with the subcommittee chair and ranking member and the House leadership to find a way to provide the increased funding requested for DOE science programs.”