FY 2013 Senate Appropriations Bill for USGS
Somewhat unexpectedly, Senate Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Jack Reed (D-RI) and Subcommittee Ranking Member Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) jointly released the starting point for their FY 2013 funding bill. Known as a “Chairman’s mark,” this draft is the basis of the subcommittee’s bill for the new fiscal year starting on Monday, October 1.
In releasing this bill on September 25, the senators explained:
“Today we release the Chairman’s mark of the Fiscal Year 2013 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill. While Congress has passed a short-term continuing resolution, we hope this final draft document will serve as a roadmap as discussions continue to finalize a responsible, balanced fiscal year 2013 appropriations bill. We will continue working together, with our colleagues and our House counterparts, to turn this draft into law.”
The House Appropriations Committee approved its version of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill and the accompanying report in mid-July. A summary of its extensive provisions can be found here
The below figures provide the Senate Chairman’s mark for USGS and its programs. Readers wishing to review specific line items for the Survey should see pages 10-13 of this committee table
Total USGS:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $1,068.0 million The Administration requested $1,102.5 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $967.0 million, a decrease of $101.0 million or 9.5 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $1,083.8 million, an increase of $15.8 million or 1.5 percent over FY 2012
Within the USGS budget are the following programs:
Ecosystems:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $161.3 million The Administration requested $177.9 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $132.5 million, a decrease of $28.8 million or 17.9 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $170.7 million, an increase of $9.4 million or 5.8 percent
Climate and Land Use Change:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $144.1 million The Administration requested $153.8 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $128.3 million, a decrease of $15.8 million or 11.0 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $145.6 million, an increase of $1.5 million or 1.0 percent
Energy, Minerals, and Environmental Health:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $96.2 million The Administration requested $97.1 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $88.3 million, a decrease of $8.0 million or 8.3 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $95.0 million, a decrease of $1.2 million or 1.3 percent
Natural Hazards:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $134.5 million The Administration requested $144.8 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $107.4 million, a decrease of $27.1 million or 20.2 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $140.0 million, an increase of $5.5 million or 4.1 percent
Water Resources:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $214.7 million The Administration requested $209.8 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $219.8 million, an increase of $5.2 million or 2.4 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $215.8 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 0.5 percent
Core Science Systems:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $106.7 million The Administration requested $120.4 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $112.3 million, an increase of $5.6 million or 5.3 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $117.9 million, an increase of $11.2 million or 10.5 percent
Administration and Enterprise Information:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $110.2 million The Administration requested $99.1 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $82.4 million, a decrease of $27.8 million or 25.2 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $99.1 million, a decrease of $11.1 million or 10.1 percent
Facilities:
The FY 2012 appropriation was $100.4 million The Administration requested $99.7 million The House Appropriations Committee recommended $96.0 million, a decrease of $4.4 million or 4.4 percent The Senate Chairman’s Mark recommends $99.7 million, a decrease of $0.7 million or 0.7 percent