FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill Draws Veto Threat

JUL 09, 2014

The White House has threatened to veto the FY 2015 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill that the full House of Representatives is now considering. A Statement of Administration Policy issued today by the Office of Management and Budget on H.R. 4923 declares:

“The bill significantly underfunds critical investments that develop American energy sources to build a clean and secure energy future, support the emerging clean energy technologies that create high-quality jobs, and enhance the Nation’s economic competiveness. The legislation also excessively restricts nonproliferation contracts with Russia and prevents the development of lower cost technologies for disposal of excess plutonium.”

The Statement continues:
“If the President were presented with H.R. 4923, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.”

The House is likely to conclude its deliberations and pass the bill this week. The counterpart bill approved by the Senate Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee was pulled from consideration by the full Senate Appropriations Committee because of disputes regarding the EPA’s regulation of power plant emissions.

Several issues of FYI review the House bill’s provisions regarding the Office of Science , the National Nuclear Security Administration , and Yucca Mountain .

Selections from the five-page Statement of Administration Policy follow:

Office of Science:

“The Administration urges the Congress to fully fund the FY 2015 Budget request for the Office of Science. The $40 million reduction from the FY 2015 Budget request would reduce the number of grants to academic investigators and funding for staff at DOE laboratories working on fundamental discovery science and research that underpins advances in clean energy. This reduction would also affect access to world class facilities used by researchers from all sectors to conduct R&D. The bill funds the international fusion project ITER, at a level $75 million above the FY 2015 Budget request. In light of schedule delays and management reforms underway, the Administration is concerned that the U.S. contributions would outpace the readiness of the project.”

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA):

“The Administration appreciates the Committee’s support for the requested funding level for NNSA’s Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation and Weapons Activities programs.”

Nuclear Nonproliferation Cooperation with Russia:

“The Administration strongly objects to the language in the bill that would prevent the use of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation appropriations for contracts with, or Federal assistance to, the Russian Federation. Nonproliferation cooperation with the Russian Federation is in the U.S. national interest and remains an essential element of the global effort to counter the threat of nuclear terrorism. Critical bilateral nuclear nonproliferation activities are continuing in a number of key areas, such as improving physical protection and reducing insider threats at vulnerable Russian facilities”

Disposition of Weapons-Usable Plutonium:

“The Administration strongly objects to language that would require the Secretary of Energy to continue construction of the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility. The Administration plans to move the facility into cold stand-by in FY 2015 as it continues to explore the potential for more cost effective alternatives while maintaining the U.S. Government’s commitment to disposing of unneeded plutonium.”

Yucca Mountain:

“The Administration objects to the DOE funding provided in the bill for Yucca Mountain and is disappointed with the Committee’s rejection of the practical solutions proposed in the Administration’s nuclear waste strategy. As reflected in the FY 2015 Budget request, this strategy incorporates important and workable elements for a successful waste program, such as consent-based siting, interim storage of waste, and program funding reforms that are essential to the success of a Nuclear Waste Program. Similarly, the Administration objects to funding provided in the bill for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to continue adjudication of the Yucca Mountain license application.”

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
Some of the most important decision-makers in science policy are facing voters in primaries and general elections this year.
FYI
/
Article
Staff communications from December reveal deliberations over which programs to “defend” and which ones might be shuttered or transferred.
FYI
/
Article
Democrats used the opportunity to challenge the department’s decision-making on a host of science topics, including Genesis, clean-energy projects, and last year’s Climate Working Group report.
FYI
/
Article
The administration’s prior attempts to cap indirect cost rates were blocked by courts and Congress.
/
Article
Nuclear winter, climate change, bioterrorism, AI. Those and other threats are growing in potential impact. What can we do?
/
Article
The specialized devices are democratizing access to cosmic-ray experiments.
/
Article
Europe’s particle physicists choose a 91 km electron–positron collider as the next global flagship project.
/
Article
The seasoned high school physics teacher challenges students to engage in an increasingly distracted world.
/
Article
Some physicists at the early cyclotrons used their vision to locate high-energy particles. Since then, medical researchers have gained a better understanding of how particles can interact with the human eye.

Related Organizations