
A chart from the interagency working group report showing increases in publications on quantum R&D. (Image credit – National Science and Technology Council)
On July 26, the Obama Administration released
One of the reports, “Advancing Quantum Information Science: National Challenges and Opportunities,”
The other report, “Quantum Sensors at the Intersections of Fundamental Science, Quantum Information Science & Computing,”
A chart from the interagency working group report showing increases in publications on quantum R&D. (Image credit – National Science and Technology Council)
Many fields of R&D entail difficulties in coordinating effort among federal agencies, and between the government, academic, and industrial sectors. Quantum R&D is no different. The interagency working group report outlines the distribution of research and funding across federal agencies and laboratories, including DOE, NSF, NIST, the Department of Defense, and the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity. The report also notes the close connection of QIS R&D to the National Strategic Computing Initiative announced last year (and which just released its own strategic plan
The report praises federal agencies for making the United States a leader in QIS research. However, it also warns that, as those agencies’ QIS programs have evolved, insufficient coordination has led to an “overall instability of U.S. research funding that has negatively impacted both the pace of technical progress and development of a QIS workforce in the United States.”
The report also draws attention to the special difficulties facing QIS R&D. The entire field rests on effects, such as quantum entanglement, that continue to be a focus for path-breaking physics research. At the same time, development of technologies such as quantum computers and encryption will require the integration of that research with traditionally distinct lines of research in applied mathematics and computer science. Moreover, all new quantum technologies will have to employ novel materials specially engineered to exploit phenomena that are inherently very difficult to control.
For such reasons, collaborations in quantum R&D must not only cross a large number of disciplines, but also connect parts of the R&D chain as far apart as university research and product engineering. Offering a sense of the kinds of gaps that will need to be bridged, the report observes:
Teams with a diverse range of skills will be needed in order to, for example, translate a proof-of-principle source of entangled photons on an optical table in a physics laboratory to a robust, scalable platform that can be incorporated into a real-life quantum network.
One of the key challenges is the lack of a consistent framework to support R&D that develops a laboratory prototype into a final marketable product. Another challenge involves licensing of intellectual property from universities; much of this IP is pre-competitive because QIS is not yet a mature field, but is being valued similarly to developed, more marketable technologies. A third is connecting capable and qualified graduates with companies in need of their specialized skills.
The interagency working group report’s recommendations take a broad perspective on the need to create stable core programs that can be quickly and flexibly augmented to tackle new opportunities as they arise.
The DOE roundtable report offers more specific suggestions for developing a “coherent and evolving portfolio of mechanisms” at DOE that would permit the agency to press further into what the report calls the “Quantum Frontier.” These mechanisms include:
The roundtable report warns that institutional inflexibility is a “cultural challenge” that may lead to U.S.-based scientists routinely leaving American institutions for other countries with a more amenable research environment.
Explaining the broader context of its own report, the interagency working group likewise points to work abroad, specifically citing the £270 million National Quantum Technologies Programme