
President Obama and Vice President Biden meet with PCAST in the White House China Room on Jan. 5.
(Image credit – White House photo by Pete Souza)
President Obama and Vice President Biden meet with PCAST in the White House China Room on Jan. 5.
(Image credit – White House photo by Pete Souza)
On Jan. 6, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology held its 45th and final in-person meeting
At the Jan. 6 PCAST meeting, there were three items of normal business on the agenda: a report to the president on ensuring long-term U.S. leadership in the semiconductor industry, PCAST’s sixth biennial review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), and an update on PCAST’s investigation of forensic science.
The semiconductor report
From the standpoint of science and technology policy, the report is notable for its inclusion of an appendix defining the increasingly prevalent buzzword “moonshot” as a term of policymaking art. According to the report, a moonshot is an “application-driven approach to fostering innovation,” akin to the engineering “grand challenges” that have proliferated in recent years. In the context of semiconductor technology, each moonshot the report proposes “vertically integrates technologies across the entire compute stack, from the top-level application down to the component technologies, in order to sufficiently nurture transformative ideas and create a more sustainable competitive advantage for the United States.”
Following discussion of the semiconductor report, PCAST members Michael McQuade and Mark Gorenberg discussed the forthcoming PCAST NNI review, which will complement a National Academies triennial review and the updated NNI strategic plan, both released in fall 2016 (see FYIs 2016 #116
Reflecting on the history of NNI, Gorenberg remarked that the previous PCAST review, completed in 2014, represented a turning point:
By 2014 many people here in the government and outside wondered if the NNI had run its course, and we looked at that seriously. ... But we also looked at it another way, which is that nanotechnology is really just in its very early innings. It is not a specific technology. It’s not tied to any particular industry or discipline or any agency silo. It’s clearly a revolution in how we work with atoms. So, we’re at those very early innings and we saw a great opportunity to move from coordination to leadership. And that leadership took on this concept of the grand challenges. … The NNI probably is more important now because of that than it has been in its last five cycles.
Finally, Eric Lander, PCAST co-chair and the chair of its forensic science working group, discussed a forthcoming addendum to the PCAST report on forensic science released in September. The report emphasized the need for firmer empirical evidence of the validity of many forensic practices. A recent opinion piece in the Washington Post noted
The meeting concluded with a roundtable discussion, led by Lander, highlighting some of the work the current incarnation of PCAST has done over the past eight years. For instance, Gorenberg expressed his surprise and satisfaction that a long and detailed 2012 report on the allocation of the government-held wireless electromagnetic spectrum had led to major policy action. Lander highlighted a short but well received report on hearing aids that spotlighted regulatory barriers to the innovation needed to make the devices better and less expensive. Maxine Savitz, PCAST vice chair, recounted the council’s work to guide government policy on advanced manufacturing. Physicist Jim Gates lauded the influence of the council’s four reports on STEM education, and recognized the importance of input received from teachers.
All but the most recent PCAST reports are currently available
Closing the meeting, Holdren thanked the council members and the staff who supported them, and acknowledged the importance of Obama’s personal engagement with their work, remarking:
I sometimes inappropriately get credit for having somehow turned him into a geek, a techno-nerd. He was one when he came. He had a deep understanding when he arrived at the presidency of how and why science, technology, and innovation matter. … I have said publicly on previous occasions, I’ll say again, I think President Obama is the most science savvy president since Thomas Jefferson, with the qualifier that there’s a lot more science to be savvy about today than there was when Thomas Jefferson was the president, and that has been, I think, to the great advantage of our nation.