FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

Barrasso Quizzes DOE on China Interactions

MAR 12, 2024
The Department of Energy defended the meetings as being a normal part of global collaboration.
AIP_Lindsay_McKenzie_800x1000.jpg
Science Policy Reporter, FYI AIP
doe-seal-wide-image.jpg

Seal of the Department of Energy

(DOE)

Senate Energy and Natural Resource Committee Ranking Member John Barrasso (R-WY) sent a letter to the Department of Energy last week expressing concern over a series of meetings between DOE officials and representatives of the Chinese government.

The letter asserts the meetings “went beyond mere diplomatic courtesies” and, in some cases, “served as forums in which the taxpayer-funded research and development of our national labs was offered up for the benefit of Chinese state-owned enterprises and, by extension, the Chinese Communist Party.”

The meetings, such as one between the director of DOE’s China Office and the president of the state-owned China Construction Technology Company were publicized only in Chinese-media, Barrasso wrote, raising “significant concern about DOE’s transparency and broader collaboration with the CCP.” His letter requests a list of all trips taken by DOE employees to China, as well as details of how staff are prepared for these visits, and a justification for DOE’s “conscious decision not to publicize these meetings.”

A DOE spokesperson defended the meetings in a statement to news outlets. “Global collaboration on key issues — such as basic scientific research and addressing the climate crisis — are critical to sustaining America’s global leadership while promoting greater prosperity and economic growth for generations to come,” the spokesperson wrote. “To that end, department officials have and will continue to strategically engage with partners and competitors from across the globe to protect and promote American innovation, advance our technological competitiveness, and strengthen our national security.”

This news brief originally appeared in FYI’s newsletter for the week of March 11.

Related Topics
More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
The response to the OMB’s proposed rule on federal financial assistance appears to be overwhelmingly negative, with strong opposition from science groups.
FYI
/
Article
However, the agency’s proposed rule would remove requirements to keep radiation “as low as reasonably achievable.”
FYI
/
Article
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought defended a sprawling proposed rule that has drawn tens of thousands of public comments over the past month.
FYI
/
Article
Committee Democrats argued the hearing was a distraction and an excuse to slash spending.
/
Article
/
Article
Researchers don’t need to do science engagement alone. Working with professionals makes the job easier and more effective and can lead to better science.
/
Article
Even a limited nuclear war could disrupt the climate, ecosystems, and global food supplies. Nuclear strategies and decisions should be required to factor in those potential consequences.
/
Article
A dataset of daily ozone concentrations with high spatial resolution enables researchers to identify the reversal.

Related Organizations