FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

DOD Promises Rigor in Analyzing ‘Unidentified Aerial Phenomena’

MAY 23, 2022
Will Thomas
Spencer R. Weart Director of Research in History, Policy, and Culture
A glowing green triangle on a black background

A still from a DOD video of an unidentified aerial object that appeared to be a flashing triangle. DOD states that an independent repeat observation of the phenomenon has provided high confidence it is actually an uncrewed aerial system that appears triangular when viewed through night-vision goggles and recorded by an SLR camera.

(DOD)

At a House Intelligence Committee hearing last week on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), senior Defense Department officials outlined their efforts to systematize the reporting and analysis of encounters with objects exhibiting inexplicable aeronautical behaviors.

“It is the department’s contention that by combining appropriately structured collected data with rigorous scientific analysis, any object that we encounter can likely be isolated, characterized, identified, and, if necessary, mitigated,” said Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security Ronald Moultrie.

He also noted that DOD is coordinating with a variety of agencies on the matter, including NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Department of Energy’s national labs. Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence Scott Bray added that the military is consulting experts, including from outside the government, in fields such as physics, optics, metallurgy, and meteorology.

Reiterating the findings of an intelligence community report on UAPs released last year, he reported, “If and when individual UAP incidents are resolved, they likely fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, U.S. government or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, or a ‘other’ bin that allows for a holding bin of difficult cases and for the possibility of surprise and potential scientific discovery.”

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
Amid concerns about maintaining dark and quiet skies for astronomy, the FCC said regulating the light impacts of satellites is outside its authority.
FYI
/
Article
The response to the OMB’s proposed rule on federal financial assistance appears to be overwhelmingly negative, with strong opposition from science groups.
FYI
/
Article
However, the agency’s proposed rule would remove requirements to keep radiation “as low as reasonably achievable.”
FYI
/
Article
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought defended a sprawling proposed rule that has drawn tens of thousands of public comments over the past month.
/
Article
/
Article
Researchers don’t need to do science engagement alone. Working with professionals makes the job easier and more effective and can lead to better science.
/
Article
Even a limited nuclear war could disrupt the climate, ecosystems, and global food supplies. Nuclear strategies and decisions should be required to factor in those potential consequences.

Related Organizations