News Currents for January 20

News Currents for January 20 lead image
NASA via Wikimedia Commons
This week, I have come across a number of interesting stories that touch on the boundaries of science’s ability to answer significant questions.
The New York Times Magazine has a tremendous story
The next topic would seem pretty easy. The question is: “What is nothing?”
Another story on big cosmic questions discusses the contribution of a field (sub-field?) I had previously not come across, the philosophy of physics. Check out this interview from The Atlantic
These stories highlight something that I love about science. The answers to all of the questions brought up in these links are open to interpretation. What happened before the Big Bang? What can a philosopher bring to questions that are ostensibly physics or cosmology? Can an amputee have an unfair advantage in a footrace? What are the most important factors in a runner’s success?
Scientists can answer a multitude of questions, but often, in order to provide a good answer, they must first answer many, many smaller questions to actually accumulate the knowledge required to address the question that first piqued someone’s curiosity.