FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

Congressional Language Terminating the SSC

OCT 27, 1993

It took about two hours late last week for the conference committee to approve the language terminating the Superconducting Super Collider. The following are the instructions Congress is giving to “orderly terminate” the SSC:

”...$640,000,000 to remain available until expended, to be used only to orderly terminate the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) project under terms and conditions as follows:

(1) to the extent provided by guidelines of the Secretary of Energy, full-time employees of contractors and designated subcontractors whose employment is terminated by reason of the termination of the SSC may receive (A) up to 90 days termination pay dating from the date of termination notice, and (B) reasonable relocation expenses and assistance.

(2) the Secretary of Energy shall prepare and submit a report with recommendations to the President and the Congress containing:

(a) a plan to maximize the value of the investment that has been made in the project and minimizing the loss to the United States and involved states and persons, including recommendations as to the feasibility of utilizing SSC assets in whole or in part in pursuit of an international high energy physics endeavor.

(b) the Secretary is authorized to consult with and use Universities Research Associates and/or other contractors and/or recognized experts in preparing this report and recommendations and is authorized to contract with such parties as may be appropriate in carrying out such duties; and

(c) the Secretary shall release any recommendations from time to time as available, but the final report shall be submitted by July 1, 1994; and

(3) nothing herein or any action taken under this authority shall be construed to change the Memorandum of Understanding between the Secretary of Energy and the State of Texas dated November 9, 1990, regarding the project.”

The language continues:

“The Secretary shall also submit to the President and the Congress a report and recommendations concerning plans for other large science projects within the jurisdiction of the Department of Energy.

“This report shall include recommendations as to whether high energy physics and other large research project and programs should continue to be pursued by the United States and, if so, for what purposes should they be pursued and how should they be funded and financed.”

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
A call for the public to share their experiences on the health impacts of wireless technologies has raised eyebrows among scientists.
FYI
/
Article
The agency issued a memo last week laying out several grantmaking changes, including a new office for metascience.
FYI
/
Article
The ruling put on hold DHS’s plan to cap international student stays at four years, but did not resolve the uncertainty facing international students considering studying in the US.
FYI
/
Article
NSF and the Department of Commerce have scrubbed references to the dangers of political interference in science from official agency policy documents.
/
Article
Interviews with 22 successful early-career physical scientists and engineers reveal that networking has been one of the most critical ways to nurture their careers.
/
Article
/
Article
Measurements of the reactivity of volatile organic compounds emitted by urban trees show that they contribute more to ground-level ozone than do other, human-produced forms of emissions.
/
Article
The heat required to erase secondary magnetic signals in clay can aid researchers in distinguishing ancient pottery from modern forgeries.

Related Organizations