FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

FY 1997 NSF Request: U.S. Polar Programs

MAR 29, 1996

The National Science Foundation budget request states:

“The FY 1997 Budget Request for U.S. Polar Programs is $226.0 million, an increase of $9.0 million, or 4.1%, over the FY 1996 Estimate of $217.0 million.

The over-all U.S. Polar Programs budget request of $226.0 million is distributed as follows (FY 1996 Estimate/FY 1997 Request):

U.S. Arctic Research Program $26.36/29.10 million
U.S. Antarctic Research Grants Program $28.00/$29.10 million
Science Support $40.66/$42.62 million
Operations/Logistics $121.98/$125.18 million

The Polar Program request has two Activities: U.S. Polar Research Programs and U.S. Antarctic Logistical Support Activities.

The U.S. Polar Research Programs budget request is $163.40 million, and increase of 5.8% or $9.00 million. This budget “supports both Arctic and Antarctic research. This Arctic support represents part of a larger NSF and federal Arctic effort. Antarctic support represents the role of NSF as manager of the entire federal Antarctic program, including special requirements for operations and science support.” Within this request, NSF is seeking the following increases: U.S. Arctic Research Program - 10.4%; U.S. Antarctic Research Grants Program - 3.9%; Operations and Science Support - 5.2%.

The U.S. Antarctic Logistical Support Activities budget request is $62.60 million, the same amount as the current budget. The request states that this budget “funds logistics provided by the Department of Defense that contribute to the U.S. presence in Antarctica.”

The foundation’s FY 1997 Major Research Equipment budget request includes safety and environmental improvements at the South Pole. See FYI #58 for information on this budget request.

The NSF submission to Congress makes no reference to questions raised by the FY 1996 VA/HUD appropriations reports on the future of Antarctic operations (see 1995 FYI #131 and 167.)

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
The AI Action Plan released last week pushes science agencies to expand researcher access to high-quality scientific data and AI resources.
FYI
/
Article
Current and former employees at NSF, NASA, NIH, and the EPA have signed onto letters enumerating their concerns.
FYI
/
Article
Top appropriators in both parties have signaled disagreement with Trump’s proposals for deep cuts and indirect cost caps.
FYI
/
Article
The new model would rename facilities and administrative costs and change how they are calculated.

Related Organizations