Decision Points: House Looks Toward Important NSF Bills
This is an important month for the National Science Foundation on Capitol Hill. On Thursday, House appropriators will mark up their FY 2016 bill providing funding for the National Science Foundation. The full House may consider the America COMPETES bill, authorizing NSF and its programs for FY 2016 and FY 2017.
The House Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations Subcommittee meets on May 14 to mark up its FY 2016 funding bill. The subcommittee was allocated $51.4 billion for FY 2016, up from this year’s level of $50.1 billion. The subcommittee has a wide-ranging portfolio, including the departments of Justice and Commerce, and agencies such as the National Science Foundation and NASA.
Members of this subcommittee are strong supporters of science. A year ago
The subcommittee is now chaired by Rep. John Culberson (R-TX). The subcommittee’s hearing
Of great interest will be committee report language regarding the foundation’s grant-making procedures and if the bill continues the practice of appropriating a single amount for NSF’s Research and Related Activities or specifies funding for individual research directorates. Both subjects were discussed at the March hearing.
It is anticipated that another important bill pertaining to NSF may be considered by the full House of Representatives in the near future. H.R. 1806, the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015 was reported out of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee last month. The 194-page bill authorizes programs for NSF, the Department of Energy Office of Science, and National Institute of Standards and Technology, among others. Sections of this bill are controversial and it was approved by the committee
NSF issued a two-page impact statement
“It has been widely anticipated that a new authorizing act would enable actions to enhance the nation’s competitiveness through science and innovation. In fact, H.R. 1806 provides findings that support the major ingredients to achieve this -- including interdisciplinary research, international partnerships, and the enhancement of a STEM workforce. Yet the specific actions H.R. 1806 proposes contradict these findings.”