FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

House Approves FY 2016 Defense Authorization Bill

MAY 19, 2015

The House of Representatives approved the National Defense Authorization Act last Friday by a vote of 269-151 on a mostly party line vote. Disputes regarding how the bill worked around strict spending limits imposed by the Budget Control Act caused many Democrats to vote against H.R. 1735, including Committee Ranking Member Adam Smith (D-WA).

This bill sets policy and program spending limits for the Department of Defense and the nuclear weapons programs of the Department of Energy. Actual funding is provided by appropriations bills.

The accompanying 641-page committee report prepared by House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-TX) and the majority staff outlines specific program policy recommendations and spending limits. Introductory material, Addressing emerging threats and challenges, on page 7 is of interest. Section II, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation starts on report page 50. Funding tables for RDT&E start on report page 453. Note that these tables include only the Administration’s FY 2016 request and the committee’s authorization level. The figures shown below regarding the FY 2015 appropriation were calculated from the FY 2016 R-1 budget request document prepared by Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). The House authorization levels were calculated from the committee report, and are as compared to the FY 2015 appropriation.

Total 6.1 Basic Research:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $2,277.8 million
The FY 2016 request is $2,089.0 million, a decrease of $188.8 million or 8.3 percent
The House bill authorizes $2,127.0 million, a decrease of $150.8 million or 6.6 percent

Total 6.2 Applied Research:
The FY 2014 appropriation was $4,647.8 million
The FY 2015 request is $4,713.2 million, an increase of $65.4 million or 1.4 percent
The House bill authorizes $4,696.2 million, an increase of $48.4 million or 1.0 percent

Total 6.3 Advanced Technology Development:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $5,326.4 million
The FY 2016 request is $5,464.4 million, an increase of $138.0 million or 2.6 percent
The House bill authorizes $5,377.0 million, an increase of $50.6 million or 1.0 percent

Total 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $12,252.0 million
The FY 2016 request is $12,266.6 million, an increase of $14.6 million or 0.1 percent
The House bill authorizes $12,200.2 million, a decrease of $51.8 million or 0.4 percent

Total Army 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $2,554.9 million
The FY 2015 request is $2,200.6 million, a decrease of $354.3 million or 13.9 percent
The House bill authorizes $2,203.6 million, a decrease of $351.3 million or 13.8 percent

Total Navy 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3:
The FY 2014 appropriation was $2,155.3 million
The FY 2015 request is $2,114.4 million or a decrease of $40.9 million or 1.9 percent
The House bill authorizes $2,142.4 million, a decrease of $12.9 million or 0.6 percent

Total Air Force 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $2,281.7 million
The FY 2016 request is $2,378.4 million or an increase of $96.7 million or 4.2 percent
The House bill authorizes $2,383.4 million, an increase of $101.7 million or 4.5 percent

Total Defense-Wide (i.e., DARPA, etc.) 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3:
The FY 2015 appropriation was $5,260.1 million
The FY 2016 request is $5,573.1 million, an increase of $313.0 million or 6.0 percent
The House bill authorizes $5,470.8 million, an increase of $210.7 million or 4.0 percent

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
If finalized, the rule could end federal grant funding for major scientific collaborations.
FYI
/
Article
Some of the most important decision-makers in science policy are facing voters in primaries and general elections this year.
FYI
/
Article
Staff communications from December reveal deliberations over which programs to “defend” and which ones might be shuttered or transferred.
FYI
/
Article
Democrats used the opportunity to challenge the department’s decision-making on a host of science topics, including Genesis, clean-energy projects, and last year’s Climate Working Group report.
/
Article
/
Article
Nuclear winter, climate change, bioterrorism, AI. Those and other threats are growing in potential impact. What can we do?
/
Article
The specialized devices are democratizing access to cosmic-ray experiments.
/
Article
Europe’s particle physicists choose a 91 km electron–positron collider as the next global flagship project.
/
Article
The seasoned high school physics teacher challenges students to engage in an increasingly distracted world.

Related Organizations