The sign in front of the US Citizenship and Immigration Services field office building in Salt Lake City.
Charles-McClintock Wilson / NurPhoto via AP
Lawsuit challenges elimination of duration of status
A broad coalition of labor and education organizations filed a lawsuit last week challenging the Department of Homeland Security’s replacement of duration-based visas with a four-year limit. The plaintiffs represent colleges and universities as well as teachers, international students, auto and aerospace workers, and journalists.
The rule in question will take effect Sept. 15 and applies to F student visas, J exchange visitor visas, and I visas for foreign journalists. Instead of allowing these visa holders to remain in the US for the duration of their academic program or journalistic assignment, DHS will now only admit individuals for a fixed time tied to their program length, capped at four years. Those seeking to stay longer will have to apply for an extension.
The suit claims the rule change is “arbitrary and capricious.” It says DHS did not properly consider comments on the rule, as required by the Administrative Procedure Act, and instead “engaged in an exercise of close-minded justification of a preordained result.”
In response to a request for comment on the lawsuit, a DHS spokesperson declined to address the lawsuit and said news outlets were engaging in “performative outrage” over the rule change.
White House outlines research security policy
The White House released a “National Security Science and Technology Strategy” document last Tuesday that lays out its strategic technical priorities, ranging from AI to nuclear energy to semiconductor industries. The document calls for increased research and talent acquisition in those areas, which it says will be “integral” in future geopolitical competition, particularly with China and for efforts such as the administration’s Golden Dome missile defense initiative.
US science and technology leadership “is itself a national security objective,” according to the document. Notably, it updates the critical and emerging technologies list used in export controls and for prioritizing federal research, adding quantum cryptography and removing virtual reality, for example. Data centers no longer count as a priority, Tom’s Hardware noted, with private companies pursuing their massive build-out in the US.
The strategy calls for “attracting and retaining top-tier global talent in critical national security S&T fields.” However, that call comes as the administration has made moves seen as discouraging overseas talent, such as $100,000 H-1B visa fees and duration of status limits. The strategy also increases restrictions on transferring know-how to China in areas such as AI, quantum information systems, semiconductors, supercomputers, and hypersonics, while calling on allies to do likewise.
Federal job protections to weaken in early September
A series of new rules will go into effect Sept. 2 that will make it easier for federal agencies to launch reductions in force and alter how employees appeal employment decisions.
One of the rules will allow agencies to fire probationary, temporary, and trial employees without declaring a formal RIF. It also reduces the significance of tenure for determining which employees are fired first during a RIF. Duration of employment will still be considered, but as a secondary metric after performance review scores.
The other rules transfer authority over certain firing appeals from the quasi-independent Merit Systems Protection Board to the Office of Personnel Management. This change applies to employees who challenge their firing as part of a RIF or while on probation, as well as those who challenge the government’s rejection of a job application on “suitability” grounds. In an op-ed published last week, OPM Director Scott Kupor argued that the changes will bring “accountability for employees who can’t deliver and distinction for those who knock the cover off the ball.”
NSF releases NOFOs for fundamental research
The National Science Foundation has released 12 funding solicitations across 5 directorates that will provide $1.5 billion in funding for foundational research in science and engineering. Scientists have waited for calls for such grant proposals since the start of the Trump administration.
The grant opportunities will provide a mix of awards lasting up to five years for ambitious, transformative research along with short-term grants to quickly test promising ideas, the agency said in its news release. In a bid to gauge the success of varied funding approaches, NSF intends to employ different grant durations, mechanisms, and institutions in awards, the agency says.
Science reports that researchers have expressed concern over the size of the NOFO’s funding, which accounts for only a small part of NSF’s more than $8 billion research budget for fiscal year 2026. Two agency directorates, Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences and STEM Education, go unmentioned in the NOFOs, raising concerns they will go unfunded next year.
“NSF expects award activity to proceed while continuing to support critical research through its rigorous, merit-based review process,” said Cassandra Eichner of the agency’s Office of Legislative and Public Affairs, in response to a query on these concerns.
Biohazard-related research policy released by NIH
NIH released a draft biosafety policy on research involving biohazards, heightening institutional biosafety committee oversight of such experiments. The public has until Oct.19 to comment on the proposed changes to lab biosafety rules.
“Through this draft policy, NIH aims to augment public safety, transparency, and accountability in its stewardship of the biomedical research enterprise,” the agency said in its announcement. The proposed practices cover a broad swath of lab biohazards, including wild-type bacteria and viruses that cause human disease, genetically modified organisms, and lab-created nucleic acids. Any institution receiving NIH funding would need to abide by the proposed rules, regardless of an experiment’s funding source, expanding past obligations.
“NIH is trying to replace a recombinant-DNA-era rulebook with a broader, more risk-based system of institutional biosafety governance,” said David Gillum, a visiting scholar at Arizona State University, in an initial assessment. New incident reporting requirements would require public posting of researcher identities. Gigi Gronvall, a professor of environmental health and engineering at Johns Hopkins University, said that provision will likely draw pushback as it could lead researchers to avoid reporting incidents out of fear of harassment.
Also on our radar
Tomorrow, the Trump administration plans to publish a proposal to impose a $100,000 fee on H-1B visa applications. Comments will likely be due by the end of September.
The Trump administration has removed roughly 38 federal datasets and altered another 337 across more than 60 agencies over the last 18 months.
OMB has reviewed around 165,000 comments on its proposed changes to the federal grantmaking process. The White House plans for the rule to take effect on Oct. 1.
Former NIAID official David Morens pled guilty to conspiracy charges stemming from his efforts to hide communications about coronavirus-related research grants from Freedom of Information Act requests.
The Pentagon has ordered 30 American universities to investigate their financial and research ties with foreign adversaries, specifically China, Russia, and Iran, by Aug. 31 or risk losing access to federal funding.
A new National Academies report urges Congress to provide reliable funding for ARPA-E to drive high-risk energy innovations. The report recommends tripling the SCALEUP program’s budget to $120 million and adopting proactive hiring to preserve the agency’s agility.
The Environmental Defense Fund filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle the National Center for Atmospheric Research. The suit contests the administration’s decision to “shut down all of NCAR’s climate research functions” and close its Mesa Lab.
The organization’s National Research Council cut back on federal money for its scientific work in 2025.
Upcoming Events
All events are Eastern Time unless otherwise noted. Listings do not imply endorsement. Events beyond this week are listed on our website.
Congress is currently on recess, with no congressional hearings scheduled this week. The House is scheduled to return Aug. 31, while the Senate will return Sept. 14. Upon their return, they will be faced with a looming Sept. 30 deadline to pass spending legislation.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.