House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-OK) and House Appropriations Energy-Water Subcommittee Chair Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN) at last week’s vote on the Energy-Water bill.
House Appropriations Committee
House releases detailed DOE Office of Science proposal
The House Appropriations Committee advanced its funding bill covering the Department of Energy last week, which proposes a 1% increase for DOE’s Office of Science, contrasting with the president’s requested 15% cut. The detailed bill report released last week reveals the committee proposals for each of the office’s divisions. The report also requests various briefings, including one on expected levels of future support for the Genesis Mission and another on plans to improve management and cost estimation for major scientific projects.
Advanced Scientific Computing Research: +5%. The House proposes $60 million for the Equinox and Lux supercomputers at Argonne and Oak Ridge National Labs. Without counting these additions, the proposal would essentially flat-fund ASCR. The $60 million proposal falls short of the president’s requested $1.2 billion for Equinox, Lux, and Solstice. The report states that the committee provides no funding for any future AI supercomputers at the national lab facilities until it “gains a better understanding on infrastructure, operations, and outyear funding implications.”
Basic Energy Sciences: +4%. The House proposes a 56% boost for facilities operations of high-flux neutron sources and boosts for two light source projects that the president’s request proposes deferring funding for.
Biological and Environmental Research: -6%. BER saw the deepest proposed cut, though still far shallower than the president’s proposed 54% cut. The House proposes maintaining funding for atmospheric research and facilities, for which the request proposes no funding.
Fusion Energy Sciences: -1%. The House proposes a 1% cut to research funding and flat funding for contributions to the multinational fusion research facility ITER. Relatedly, the proposal does not include funding for the separate Office of Fusion, stating that commercialization efforts should be conducted through the Office of Technology Commercialization.
High Energy Physics: +2%. The House proposes a 1% cut to research funding, compared to the 17% cut proposed in the president’s request. The proposal aligns with the requested increase for LBNF/DUNE and the requested cut to the Proton Improvement Plan II.
Nuclear Physics: essentially flat. The House proposes a 6% cut to research funding, compared to the 17% cut proposed in the president’s request. It proposes boosts for low energy and medium energy physics facilities.
Isotope R&D: flat. The House proposes a 5% increase for research funding and matches the president’s requested decrease for the U.S. Stable Isotope Production and Research Center.
The Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee advanced a funding bill last week that proposes a 4% cut to the U.S. Geological Survey. The full committee will consider the bill next Wednesday and is expected to release the detailed bill report before then.
NIST head confirmed, NSF nominee still awaits hearing
The Senate confirmed a large bloc of nominees last week by a 46-43 vote, including Arvind Raman to lead the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Matthew Anderson to serve as deputy administrator of NASA, and Kyle Haustveit to serve as a Department of Energy under secretary. Haustveit succeeds Wells Griffith, who was removed from his position in October.
Meanwhile, the American Association for the Advancement of Science is urging the Senate to hold an open hearing for President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the National Science Foundation, Jim O’Neill. “Mr. O’Neill must articulate to this Committee and to the American people his vision for American discovery science in an era of tremendous disruption,” the letter from AAAS states.
The letter describes “a wide array of issues” at NSF, including a 30% drop in staff, a 59% decrease in spending between 2025 and 2026, withholding of grants, and reduced international collaboration. It also argues that O’Neill’s “unconventional background” merits “greater scrutiny of the nomination by Congress.” O’Neill does not have an advanced science degree or experience conducting science or engineering research, unlike previous confirmed NSF directors. Prior to the nomination, O’Neill served as acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. O’Neill worked for the Department of Health and Human Services during George W. Bush’s administration and later became an investor, including for the Thiel Foundation’s Breakout Labs program, which funded early-stage commercialization of scientific research.
NASA announces reorganization, new center directors
NASA announced an agency reorganization and several leadership updates on Friday. The Science Mission Directorate remains unchanged but will now report directly to Administrator Jared Isaacman rather than to the associate administrator, as will all the directorate heads. The reorganization combines the mission directorates for exploration systems development and space operations into the Human Spaceflight Mission Directorate, and the aeronautics research mission and space technology mission directorates into the Research and Technology Mission Directorate. “There will be no reduction in force, no program cancellations, no closures, but we will achieve cost savings through more efficient execution and taking an active role in delivering the outcomes the world has been waiting for from NASA,” Isaacman states in the announcement.
Newly announced NASA center directors include Jamie Dunn for Goddard Space Flight Center, Brian Hughes for Kennedy Space Center, and Dawn Schaible for Glenn Research Center. Dunn was a project manager for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope; he received praise from Isaacman in April for keeping the telescope on track for completion without further cost overruns, Aerospace America reported. Cynthia Simmons will remain Goddard deputy director after serving as acting director since August 2025. NASA announced Hughes as senior director of launch operations earlier this month, and he previously served as the agency’s chief of staff; Democrats on the House Science Committee have said Hughes “personally directed the agency’s illegal implementation of the White House budget last year.” Dawn Schaible was previously the Glenn deputy director.
Commerce awards CHIPS funds to quantum companies
The Commerce Department announced last week that it will provide more than $2 billion in CHIPS and Science Act funds to several quantum companies, including for quantum foundries at IBM and GlobalFoundries. IBM will receive $1 billion to establish a quantum foundry subsidiary company for quantum-grade superconducting wafers. More than $600 million will go to seven other companies to “address the most consequential, unresolved engineering problems” related to quantum, the announcement states.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), the ranking member on the House Science Committee, called the funding plans “illegal and troubling on so many levels.” In a statement, she said the U.S. should be investing in quantum, but that the money awarded for these deals was specifically set aside for public-private partnerships supporting microelectronics R&D, not manufacturing incentives for quantum manufacturing. “The administration is, once again, directly defying very clear direction from Congress,” she wrote. The department announced its plan to allocate CHIPS R&D funds via a single solicitation in November, after “clawing back” $7.4 billion from the National Semiconductor Technology Center. Lofgren also criticized the equity stakes that the department is taking in each company as part of the deal, saying, “That represents communism, not capitalism.”
Also on our radar
NASA announced it will open a competition to operate the Jet Propulsion Lab. Caltech has operated the lab since its inception, and its agreement ends on Sept. 30, 2028.
A GAO report estimated that nine agencies, including NSF and DOE, could collectively spend as much as $1 billion annually on publishing charges, more than triple what they spent in 2024. Of the agencies studied, only NIH had planned for the potential budgetary effects of shifting toward pay-to-publish models, the report states.
NIH and NASA are imposing stricter rules on foreign co-authorship for some grantees, despite no formal guidance changing the requirements, Science reported.
House Science Republicans raised concerns that NOAA is not fully meeting its oversight and reporting responsibilities regarding weather modification, pointing to a GAO report from February. They also expressed concerns about the risks of marine cloud brightening and other solar geoengineering technologies.
Science academies of the G7 countries issued statements to inform discussions during the G7 summit in June regarding protecting the Arctic, coordinating international action on large satellite constellations, and prioritizing brain health.
The UN passed a resolution stating that governments can be held liable for climate inaction, despite opposition from the U.S. and seven other countries.
Connecticut’s state government will provide $35 million to support its state university after the Trump administration cut $95 million of its research funding in 2025.
CERN has begun its public consultation process for the Future Circular Collider in Switzerland, and will hold public debate in France beginning in June. Both processes will end in October.
Recent statements about the high cost of scholarly publishing and subscription fees paid by the federal government may signal major policy changes ahead.
Upcoming Events
All events are Eastern Time unless otherwise noted. Listings do not imply endorsement. Events beyond this week are listed on our website.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
The Trump administration’s latest budget request proposes canceling federal subscriptions to academic journals and banning the use of federal funds to cover publishing costs.
April 17, 2026 04:38 PM
Subscribe to FYI This Week
FYI This Week
Start your week with a briefing on the latest science policy news.