FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

Winners and Losers: Outcome of FY 2005 Budget Cycle

DEC 07, 2004

The 3,000+ page omnibus appropriations bill that President Bush will sign in the next few days marks the conclusion of the FY 2005 budget cycle. This bill, and the earlier stand-alone bills for the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security, fund science and technology programs of interest to the physics community. As is true of any budget cycle, there were winners and losers. The below figures are taken from previous issues of FYI. Note that changes in program content, etc. were not included in the calculations. Also note that there are rarely absolutely certain budget numbers involving multiple years and multiple sources of information. Figures reflect mandated across-the-board reductions. Full budget information on the below programs may be accessed at http://www.aip.org/gov/budginfo.html

NIST Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program: +178.4%
Dept. of Homeland Security Research, Development, Acquisition and Operations: +22.4%
Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships: +19.8%
Department of Energy Scientific Workforce Development: +18.8%
National Institute of Standards and Technology (total): +14.9%
Department of Energy Advanced Scientific Computing Research: +14.9%
National Institute of Standards and Technology Laboratories: +12.8%
NSF Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction: +12.1%
NASA Exploration Capabilities: +11.1%
Department of Defense 6.2 Applied Research Programs: +11.9%
Department of Defense 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 Programs (total): +10.3%
Department of Defense 6.3 Advanced Technology Development Programs: +9.8%
Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences Program: +9.3%
Department of Defense 6.1 Basic Research Program: +7.8%
NASA (total): +4.5%
Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences: +4.3%
Department of Energy Nuclear Physics Program: +3.9%
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of NIH: +3.3%
Department of Energy Office of Science: +2.9%
U.S. Geological Survey Facilities: +1.6%
Department of Energy High Energy Physics: +0.3%

U.S. Geological Survey (total): -0.2%
National Science Foundation Research and Related Activities: -0.7%
U.S. Geological Survey Biological Research: -1.6%
National Science Foundation (total): -1.9%
NASA Science, Aeronautics and Exploration: -1.9%
U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations: -2.0%
U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Hazards, Resources, and Processes: -2.1%
U.S. Geological Survey Mapping, Remote Sensing and Geographic Investigations: -8.5%
National Science Foundation Education and Human Resources: -10.4%
Department of Energy Biological and Environmental Research: -10.8%
National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Technology Program: -17.0%
Department of Energy Science Laboratories Infrastructure: -22.7%
U.S. Geological Survey Science Support: -27.8%
National Science Foundation Mathematics and Science Partnerships: -43.0%

DOE/NNSA Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator: No funding
DOE/NNSA Advanced Weapons Concepts: No funding
DOE/NNSA Modern Pit Facility site selection: No funding
DOE/NNSA Nevada Test Site Enhancement Readiness: No funding

Note: The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers was 3.2% higher in October 2004 than October 2003; see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf

Comparable figures for the outcome of the FY 2004 budget cycle are available at http://www.aip.org/fyi/2004/006.html

More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
FYI
/
Article
If finalized, the rule could end federal grant funding for major scientific collaborations.
FYI
/
Article
Some of the most important decision-makers in science policy are facing voters in primaries and general elections this year.
FYI
/
Article
Staff communications from December reveal deliberations over which programs to “defend” and which ones might be shuttered or transferred.
FYI
/
Article
Democrats used the opportunity to challenge the department’s decision-making on a host of science topics, including Genesis, clean-energy projects, and last year’s Climate Working Group report.
/
Article
/
Article
Nuclear winter, climate change, bioterrorism, AI. Those and other threats are growing in potential impact. What can we do?
/
Article
The specialized devices are democratizing access to cosmic-ray experiments.
/
Article
Europe’s particle physicists choose a 91 km electron–positron collider as the next global flagship project.
/
Article
The seasoned high school physics teacher challenges students to engage in an increasingly distracted world.

Related Organizations