FYI: Science Policy News
FYI
/
Article

NSF Sets Guardrails for Research Security Analytics

JUN 26, 2023
Mitch Ambrose headshot
Director of Science Policy News AIP
Rebecca Keiser

Rebecca Keiser, NSF’s chief of research security strategy and policy, at a Senate hearing in 2019.

U.S. Senate

The National Science Foundation announced last week that it has published guidelines for how the agency’s research security office will perform analytics to identify potential failures to disclose information that is required as part of the grant application process.

Office director Rebecca Keiser emphasized in a foreword to the guidelines that agency program officers will not be permitted to use such analytics as part of the merit review process, shielding them from the “burden of geopolitics.”

The analytics will only be conducted by staff members in her office, who will be prohibited from making inquiries that are “explicitly or implicitly designed to return the identities of individuals of a specific national origin or racial identity.”

NSF states these analytics are designed only to identify “potential compliance inconsistencies” and does not view them as “investigations,” which are handled by the agency’s Office of Inspector General.

Related Topics
/
Article
The measured trajectories of the products of a rare B-meson decay deviate from the predictions of the standard model.
/
Article
/
Article
With a new approach to generating powerful laser pulses, researchers may have the means to observe phenomena in quantum electrodynamics.
More from FYI
FYI
/
Article
Recent statements about the high cost of scholarly publishing and subscription fees paid by the federal government may signal major policy changes ahead.
FYI
/
Article
The agency has shifted “rotator” staff into non-supervisory roles, in alignment with long-standing White House guidance.
FYI
/
Article
The House budget proposal for 2027 would cut funding across several agencies, but by far less than what the Trump administration has proposed.
FYI
/
Article
The White House says the board’s firing was necessary to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision.

Related Organizations