President Donald Trump reportedly fired the entire National Science Board on Friday. Details are murky, as the White House has not formally announced the firings and news is trickling in from board members who have publicly spoken out about the termination emails they received. The board’s website remains unupdated, still showing its previous membership and a quarterly meeting scheduled for May 5. The National Science Foundation declined to comment and referred all questions to the White House, which did not respond to a request for details before publication.
The board is required by statute and has existed since the 1950s. It plays a major role in establishing NSF policy and advises Congress and the president on scientific issues. The 24 committee members are scientific experts who are selected by the president and serve 6-year terms in a part-time capacity. NSB Chair Victor McCrary and Vice Chair Aaron Dominguez were elected to lead the board last August after former NSB Chair Darío Gil left to lead the Department of Energy’s Office of Science. The board was scheduled to meet on April 16 to discuss its next election, but canceled that meeting and never rescheduled it.
The firings will likely add to the tumult at NSF. The foundation has been without a confirmed director since April 2025, has shed roughly a third of its staff since the start of 2025, and is currently transferring its operations from a custom-built office to a building a few blocks away. The White House proposed halving the agency’s budget last year and has made a similar proposal for the next budget cycle. The proposed cut would also reduce NSB’s budget from $5 million to $3 million.
The firings have drawn swift criticism from scientific societies and Democratic leaders. House Science Committee Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) released a statement implying that Trump may seek to replace the board with “MAGA loyalists who won’t stand up to him.” Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Ranking Member Maria Cantwell (D-WA) called the firings “a dangerous attack on the institutions and expertise that drive American innovation and discovery.” Association of American Universities President Barbara Snyder said the firings leave NSF “rudderless,” and the American Association for the Advancement of Science issued a statement calling the move “destabilizing.” The Association of Public Land-Grant Universities said it was “dismayed” by the firings. Union of Concerned Scientists CEO Gretchen Goldman criticized the firings as an “unseemly political maneuver” aimed at limiting independent science.
House CJS budget markup scheduled for this week
The House Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations Subcommittee will likely unveil its budget proposal for 2027 this week. The committee’s jurisdiction includes NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the Commerce Department (which includes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Institute of Standards and Technology). A markup of the bill is scheduled for Thursday, though a text has not been released as of publication. The committee has been allocated roughly $77 billion to distribute among the agencies under its jurisdiction.
Other notable appropriations bills for science are slated to receive mark-ups in their House subcommittees later in May. These include the Energy-Water bill, which covers the Energy Department; the Interior-Environment bill, which covers most of the Interior Department (including the U.S. Geological Survey) and the Environmental Protection Agency; and the Labor, Health, and Education bill, which covers the National Institutes of Health and the Education Department. The equivalent committees in the Senate have not announced a schedule.
Also on our radar
OSTP Director Michael Kratsios posted on social media that the U.S. has evidence that foreign entities, mostly in China, are running “industrial-scale campaigns to steal American AI.” Rep. John Moolenar (R-MI), who chairs the House Select Committee on the CCP, echoed Kratsios’ concerns in a press release, urging Congress to pass legislation that will modernize export controls and restrict China’s access to American technology.
A petition calling on the International Congress of Mathematicians to move its July conference in Philadelphia outside the U.S. has garnered thousands of signatories.
A proposed NRC rule on nuclear radiation safety requirements was planned to be published on Thursday, but has been delayed. The current planned publication date is June 18.
NIH recently updated its Grants Policy Statement and last week announced it is adjusting the implementation timeline for some of its new Common Form requirements. The agency said the requirements would be fully incorporated into the next Grants Policy Statement.
NIH’s small business program is preparing to launch new funding opportunities for small businesses following the reauthorization of the STTR and SBIR programs, with some tweaks to foreign disclosure and risk management requirements.
Republican leaders on the House Energy-Water and Interior-Environment appropriations subcommittees previewed some of their upcoming budget priorities for nuclear energy and research in op-eds published last week.
Your support keeps our community informed on the latest science policy news.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.