The International Space Station seen from a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft shortly after undocking.
NASA
Senate committee advances NASA authorization bill
The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee unanimously advanced the NASA Authorization Act of 2026 last week, marking the latest step in Congress’s effort to set long-term priorities for the agency. The bill would authorize the creation of a permanent base on the Moon; reinstate the roles and responsibilities of NASA’s chief scientist, chief economist, and chief technologist; support STEM education efforts; and extend NASA’s operation of the International Space Station from 2030 to 2032 – giving the agency more time to transition the scientific research currently conducted on the ISS to one or more commercial space stations before beginning efforts to deorbit the ISS.
The bill would direct NASA to continue developing the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope and prevent the agency from discontinuing the Chandra X-ray Telescope.
The bill would also support NASA leaders’ recently revised plans for future Artemis missions, which include canceling planned upgrades to the Space Launch System. Additionally, the bill would direct NASA to submit plans for a new Mars Sample Return effort. MSR was not funded by the latest appropriations, effectively cancelling the project in its current form.
The nominee to be NASA’s deputy administrator, Matthew Anderson, told the committee during his nomination hearing last Thursday that he was pleased to see the bipartisan commitment of the committee to NASA and pledged to enact the goals of the authorization bill, if passed. During his testimony, Anderson also committed to supporting basic research, spoke with excitement about the future of hypersonics and space nuclear propulsion, and highlighted the importance of maintaining American leadership in space over Chinese competitors. The committee is scheduled to vote later this week on Anderson’s nomination, along with that of Arvind Raman to be NIST director.
A companion NASA authorization bill was unanimously advanced by the House Science Committee in February.
NSF addresses ‘returned without review’ graduate fellowship applications
In response to reports that an unusually high number of Graduate Research Fellowship Program applications were returned without review this year, the National Science Foundation stated in an online FAQ published in late February that the number of returned applications “has not changed substantially since last year.” According to the group Grant Witness, some applications were returned without review “despite clearly falling in the fields of study listed in the solicitation.” The group also reported that, “It appears that either guidance in the solicitation was not clear, or that eligibility criteria not included in the solicitation were applied to screen the applications, resulting in a disproportionate number of RWR in the biological sciences and perhaps in other fields of study.” NSF said all applications returned without review for ineligible proposed research were screened by multiple program officers with subject-matter expertise and determined not to meet the stated eligibility criteria.
The program issued fewer awards in 2025 than in previous years. Additionally, NSF made two notable changes to GRFP eligibility this year: applicants must not have completed more than one academic year in a graduate program, and students pursuing clinical psychology degrees are no longer eligible. In its FAQ, NSF also stated other reasons an application may be returned without review, including failure to meet formatting requirements or missing required documents.
White House makes NSF director nomination official
The White House formally announced the nomination of Silicon Valley investor and entrepreneur Jim O’Neill to lead the National Science Foundation last week. O’Neill had been leading the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya took on that role on a temporary basis last month. If confirmed, O’Neill will serve a six-year term at NSF. Also on March 2, President Donald Trump nominated Kaveh Farzad to be Assistant Secretary of Energy for International Affairs, and nominated former DOE official Preston Wells Griffith to be a U.S. representative for the International Atomic Energy Agency and the United Nations.
Also on our radar
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced two new hiring initiatives at the agency last week: one to bring in top talent from the private sector for two-year terms and another to change contractor positions to civil servant positions. NASA’s workforce has shrunk by over 20%, more than 4,000 people, since January 2025, and over three-quarters of separations during that time were part of the deferred resignation program, according to updated OPM data.
A group of unions and labor federations updated its lawsuit against the Trump administration to argue that the Schedule Policy/Career final rule violates a congressional mandate for a nonpartisan and merit-based civil service. Meanwhile, the NIH said it would no longer recognize a union for early-career researchers, whose contract was finalized in December 2024.
The Senate passed a fast-tracked bill to reauthorize the SBIR and STTR programs for five years. The program authorization lapsed last October. The bill now goes to the full House for consideration.
The Senate Health Committee will hold a hearing on Thursday morning on malign foreign influence in higher education.
Democratic lawmakers asked the Federal Judicial Center to reverse its removal of the climate science chapter in its reference manual, a major scientific resource for U.S. federal courts. The removal followed a complaint from a group of Republican state attorneys general.
The Florida Board of Governors approved a pause on using H-1B visas to hire foreign faculty and other employees at state universities until January. A similar pause in Texas, which began in January, requires state agencies and universities to obtain government approval to hire using H-1Bs.
The grassroots organization Stand Up for Science held rallies across the country on Saturday. Speakers at the flagship rally in DC included several congressional representatives from Maryland and Virginia.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.