A plaque near the chairman’s seat in the committee room for the House Appropriations Committee.
House Appropriations
House science appropriators reject deepest Trump cuts
The House Appropriations Committee’s fiscal year 2027 Commerce, Justice, Science appropriations bill, published last week, rejects some of the most drastic cuts to science proposed by the Trump administration, but would still significantly reduce funding levels at some science agencies if enacted.
The Republican-authored bill was advanced by the House Appropriations CJS Subcommittee last Thursday, April 30, by an 8-6 vote, with all Republicans supporting, and all Democrats opposing. A full committee markup session is scheduled for May 13. The Senate has not yet released any of its 2027 appropriations bills.
During the markup session, Republican committee members, including Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-OK) and CJS Subcommittee Chair Hal Rogers (R-KY), spoke about the importance of investing in science and staying ahead of China, with both praising the success of NASA’s Artemis II mission. The House appropriations bill proposes flat funding for the space agency, in contrast with the 23% cut proposed by the Trump administration. CJS Subcommittee Ranking Member Grace Meng (D-NY) noted, however, that the House proposal would still cut funding for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate by nearly $1.3 billion.
Both Meng and Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) also criticized the bill’s proposal to cut the National Science Foundation’s budget to $7 billion, $1.75 billion below last year’s. They also criticized the bill’s proposed cuts to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Excluding earmarks, NIST would receive about $1 billion, a $160 million cut from 2026. The bill would also cut the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s budget by 5%, while keeping funding for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy flat.
“I disagree with this bill’s approach,” Meng said during the markup. “As I have said repeatedly, I believe we should be doubling down on the investments in science that grow our economy and incentivize advancements that improve life for all Americans.”
Former NSF and NSB leaders call for leadership
Thirteen former National Science Board chairs and National Science Foundation directors released a letter over the weekend calling on the Senate to “act expeditiously” to confirm a new NSF director and for the White House to “quickly seat” a new NSB. The letter comes in the wake of the White House firing the entire NSB on April 24. NSF has been without a confirmed director since April 2025. President Trump has nominated former acting CDC Director Jim O’Neill to serve as NSF director, but the Senate HELP Committee has not yet scheduled a nomination hearing. The signatories include leaders who served during Republican and Democratic administrations dating back to the 1970s.
Golden Dome budget request draws scrutiny
The Department of Defense has requested a budget of $17.9 billion for President Trump’s Golden Dome project in fiscal year 2027 — a figure that has prompted bipartisan questions in recent budget hearings about how feasible space-based interception is, how long it will take to build a working system, and how much the system will eventually cost. Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ), for example, said in a hearing with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last week that he had heard estimates that the program might cost anywhere from $500 billion to one trillion dollars. “I know a little bit about intercepting stuff in space. It’s really hard, and the physics on this favors the offense,” Kelly said. The Trump administration continues to express optimism for the program, with the Space Force announcing last week that it has partnered with 12 companies to develop the technology needed to demonstrate an “initial capability in 2028.”
Also on our radar
The House and Senate are taking a break this week from budget-related hearings and markups. The initial House version of the Energy-Water bill, which includes DOE, will likely be released next week ahead of its May 15 markup.
The House Science Committee advanced the National Quantum Initiative Reauthorization Act last week, with some amendments. The Senate Commerce Committee passed its version of the bill last month.
Janet Petro, the director of NASA’s Kennedy Space Center who also served as the agency’s acting head from January to July 2025, announced her retirement last week.
Trump issued an executive order last week that aims to make more government contracts fixed-price and reduce the use of cost-reimbursement contracts, though it acknowledges that the latter may be appropriate for projects that “involve research and development or pre‑production development for major systems acquisition.”
Your support keeps our community informed on the latest science policy news.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.